Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Stryjek, Tomasz" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Debata o dekomunizacji na Ukrainie w 2015 roku: jak politycy „wygrali” z intelektualistami
    The Debate on De-Communization in Ukraine in 2015: How Politicians ‘Won’ Against Intellectuals
    Autorzy:
    Stryjek, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373592.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-05-12
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    de-communization
    public debate
    mass media
    discourse
    intellectual field
    human rights
    freedom of speech
    dekomunizacja
    debata publiczna
    środki masowego przekazu
    dyskurs
    pole intelektualne
    prawa człowieka
    wolność słowa
    Opis:
    This article analyses the de-communization laws passed in Ukraine in May 2015 and the public debate they evoked. The author presents the circumstances in which the laws were passed and describes the thought processes of their drafters from the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance. Three discourses are distinguished in the debate: the expert, the national-liberal, and the deconstructivist. With the exception of representatives of the national-liberal discourse, the debaters were critical of the laws and expected either their rejection by the president or their fundamental amendment. In the end, however, the laws passed into force in their first version. Drawing conclusions from this failure of the participants in the debate, the author analyses the relations between the intellectual field and the political field in Ukraine and also the internal relations of the former—between its participants within the country and abroad. In conclusion, the author ponders the strategy that should be adopted by Ukrainian intellectuals for the purpose of increasing their influence on the decision-making of politicians.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2015, 59, 2; 117-145
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Modele polskiej polityki pamięci. Obrazy wojny o Lwów w listopadzie 1918 roku w polskich periodykach polityczno-społecznych w miesiącu stulecia niepodległości Polski
    Models of Polish Memory Policies: Images of the War for Lviv in November 1918 in Polish Social and Political Periodicals in the Month of Commemorations of Poland’s Centennial of Independence
    Autorzy:
    Stryjek, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781610.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    memory policy
    images of the past
    media discourse
    relations between Poland and Ukraine
    polityka pamięci
    obrazy przeszłości
    dyskurs medialny
    stosunki polsko-ukraińskie
    Opis:
    This article contains a comparative analysis of presentations in selected Polish periodicals in November 2018 of the war between Poland and the Western Ukrainian People’s Republic over Lviv and Eastern Galicia in the years 1918–1919. In an analysis of the media discourse the author takes into account factographic, axiological, teleological, ideological, and political dimensions. He distinguishes five conventions for the presentation of the events: national-dramatic, national-heroic, martyrological-defamatory, tragic, and tragi-comical. He argues that not all have been represented in the different models of memory policy functioning in the public debate in Poland under the governments of the Law and Justice party (2015–2019). He considers that there have been four such models: the nationalist-Catholic, conservative-nationalist, universalist-patriotic, and self-critical. He argues that the rightist political party (Law and Justice) has long aligned itself with the conservative-nationalist model, while centrist groups, and especially the leftist group, do not attach great importance to memory policy. The author points to the danger resulting from neglect of historical issues in the Polish media.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2019, 63, 2; 99-131
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wojny – historia, pamięć, współczesność: wprowadzenie
    War - History, Memory, Contemporaneity: Introduction
    Autorzy:
    Stryjek, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781622.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    war
    history of Europe
    contemporary world
    social awareness
    wojna
    historia Europy
    świat współczesny
    świadomość społeczna
    Opis:
    This essay contains reflections on the role of war in European history and on contemporary Europeans’ awareness of the wars currently underway. In the historical part of the text, the author refers to the classic justification of the creation of a state as an alternative to war. The author recalls the conflicts and destruction in Europe to the end of the nineteenth century – an era in which war theoreticians and national leaders treated war as an acceptable tool for obtaining political aims. Then the author presents the world wars of the twentieth century as a threat to the existence of Europe and the process of building – in this century and with the large participation of Europeans – an international system to prevent conflicts. In the part referring to contemporary times, the author claims that in Europe wars are perceived almost exclusively as “local” conflicts, occurring far from European borders. Europeans are little aware of the fact that the sources of the wars in the Middle East and Africa are today global in nature and could affect Europeans themselves. The reluctance to admit these facts appears to be greatest in Poland and its neighboring countries in East Central Europe, where the attention of governments, public opinion, and even academics, is focused on the region’s twentieth-century wars.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2019, 63, 2; 3-8
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    ,,Wojna o pamięć o wydarzeniach lat trzydziestych-pięćdziesiątych XX wieku w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej w latach 2005-2010 — strategie polityki Litwy, Łotwy, Estonii, Ukrainy i Rosji
    “A War for Memory”: About the Events of the 30s–50s of the 20th Century in the Central and Eastern Europe 2005–2010 — Policy Strategies of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine and Russia
    Autorzy:
    Stryjek, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373653.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011-11-22
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    remembrance policy
    identity politics
    World War II
    Nazi and Soviet crimes
    the Holocaust
    genocide
    war for memory
    polityka wobec pamięci
    polityka tożsamości
    druga wojna światowa
    zbrodnie nazistowskie i sowieckie
    Holokaust
    ludobójstwo
    wojna o pamięć
    Opis:
    In his article the Author examines the notion of remembrance policy, the importance of remembering the events of the period 1939–1953 for contemporary identity politics in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia as well as the course of a conflict about the memory, which escalated between those countries and Russia particularly between 2005–2010. The Author introduces a term “remembrance policy model”, which concerns the balance of powers among political actors in a given state, who influence the shape of this aspect of the state policy. He also analyses the state strategies of the remembrance policy in international relations within the region, with special attention to Lithuania and Ukraine. He examines reasons for the success of the policy of remembering the 1939–1953 events in Lithuania in 1991–2011 and a failure of such policy in Ukraine in 2005–2010. The sources of difference between the effects of these two policies lie, in his opinion, not only in far greater ethnic and identity homogeneity of the Lithuanian society, but also in the fact that the EU gave an early, clear and consistent support for economic, social and political transformation of that country, which was, unfortunately, not provided to Ukraine — either after its establishment in 1991, or after the Orange Revolution in 2004.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2011, 55, 4; 191-223
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies