Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "dziedzictwo kulturowe" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 24
Tytuł:
Monika Murzyn-Kupisz, Dziedzictwo kulturowe a rozwój lokalny, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie”. Seria specjalna: „Monografie”, nr 221, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, Kraków 2012, ss. 350
Autorzy:
Kozioł, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538907.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
„Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie”
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 2; 258-261
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Doświadczenie inwazji tatarskich w narracjach ludowych i pamięci zbiorowej jako niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe Polski południowo-wschodniej
Experience of Tatar invasions in narrations and collective memory as intangible cultural heritage of south-eastern Poland
Autorzy:
Gliwa, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537531.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
pamięć zbiorowa
inwazje tatarskie
Polska południowo-wschodnia
niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
Opis:
The present area of the south-eastern Poland (Podkarpackie Voivodeship) belonged to these parts of the Kingdom of Poland, and from 1569 the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which for several centuries, from late Middle Ages to the end of the 17th century, were affected by extremely destructive Tatar invasions. For several centuries Tatar military expeditions to the Polish and Lithuanian territories that aimed at robbing and terrorising local population were an excellent tool used by the Crimean Khanate, and also periodically by the rulers of the Ottoman Empire who employed subordinate Nogai tribes, for forcing the kings of Poland to pass special fees and levies, which was guaranteed in Polish-Ottoman and Polish-Tatar peace treaties. These fees, referred to as “gifts”, were a relic of the Mongol and Tatar supremacy over Ruthenian territories in the times of the Golden Horde. A long-term threat of rapacious invasions of the Tatars from Crimea and Budjak and their catastrophic economic and demographic effects were not the only consequences of the military activity of Tatar hordes on the territory of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. This multi-dimensional and periodically very intensive impact of Tatar cavalry raids must have caused the formation of a specific cultural discourse and collective memory reproduction processes in communities that were threatened existentially, exploited economically and drained demographically. The strength and remarkable durability of the collective memory of Tatar attacks is primarily a result of such factors as distance and strangeness of aggressors in terms of civilization, culture and religion, but the specific character of the activities carried out by the Tatars was an even more important factor that generated collective memory of the attacked community. A characteristic feature of Tatar operations was the application of asymmetric warfare consisting in concentration of operational efforts in the civil sphere, which was reflected mostly in conducting expropriating operations and taking the defenceless people, mainly from rural areas, into captivity. Collective memory related to the historical phenomenon of Tatar invasions has been preserved in legends, songs, sayings, folk proverbs and beliefs transmitted from generation to generation in local communities (oral history) and in specific elements of religious ceremonies. A characteristic feature of these traditional records, despite their quite considerable diversity in form and content, was the presence of the idea of providentialism, a belief in particular care of God over the Commonwealth and the communities of the faithful that were threatened by the attacks of hostile forces. The above-mentioned historiosophical vision was not only popular among the nobility and bourgeoisie, but also among the broad group of the peasant population, and slightly later penetrated into their awareness by means of the parishes of the Catholic as well as the Orthodox, and later the United Church. The narrative structures of the legends frequently contain motives of wonderful divine interventions, often associated with the devotion to the Virgin Mary and supernatural meteorological phenomena that saved lives and freedom of people and brought salvation for cities and villages threatened with destruction. There are also many legends with moral and educational content, which refer to the figures of renegades who, during Tatar attacks, betrayed and shared their knowledge with hostile troops for various reasons. From the social point of view, an important role of legends and folk stories related to Tatars was their therapeutic and compensating role as well as an inscription of Tatar threats into the existing system of terms and values. It should be emphasized that collective memory of the Tatar attacks was strengthened, consolidated and reproduced also due to the symbolism present in iconography of sacral buildings and in the local cultural landscape in the form of roadside shrines, crosses and mounds. The product of synergistic connection of influences of intangible and tangible memory carriers, which interconnect by using a dialectically complicated intergenerational communication network, was a creation of collective memory, consolidated by means of official historical and religious discourses that constitute its social frame. Durability as well as catastrophic economic and demographic effects of Tatar invasions caused the situation where the contacts between the peasant population of the Commonwealth and the warriors from Crimea and Budjak became a border experience and foundational trauma that affected the formation of identity of local communities as a confrontation of different values and lifestyles originating from different civilization and cultural circles. For this reason the centuries of nomad invasions, which were in fact a dramatic, intercultural conflict and “the clash of civilizations”, may be defined – following the concept of Pierre Nora – as one of the central and symbolic “places of memory” (lieu de mémoire), having a multi-dimensional impact on the Polish culture.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 53-73
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Edukacja na rzecz dziedzictwa kulturowego na przykładzie projektu dla nauczycieli realizowanego przez Centrum Turystyki Kulturowej TRAKT w Poznaniu
Education in the context of cultural heritage – the case of educational project for teachers realized by TRAKT Center of Cultural Tourism in Poznań
Autorzy:
Pernak, Renata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537777.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
edukacja
nauczyciele
Poznań
instytucja kultury
Centrum Turystyki Kulturowej TRAKT
Opis:
Education in the context of cultural heritage should be an vital part of school education. This, however, depends largely on school teachers. That is why, what is most important is the education of teachers themselves. They should see the importance of teaching about heritage and find the opportunities concerning how to use this theme in the classrooms. Teachers should also receive materials, that would help them in conducting classes. Due to that, TRAKT Center of Cultural Tourism in Poznań decided to organize a project for teachers that is called The cultural heritage of Cathedral Island in Poznań. The basic element of the project was publishing a manual for teachers and educators. It helped them gain theoretical and practical knowledge about Cathedral Island – the oldest area in Poznań. The project also included workshops for teachers combined with a trip to the Cathedral Island. Another element of the project was meeting with students preparing themselves to being teachers. The project will end in December 2013.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 123-126
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ZACHOWANE – OCALONE? O KRAJOBRAZIE KULTUROWYM I SPOSOBACH JEGO KSZTAŁTOWANIA Pod red. Iwony Liżewskiej i Wiktora Knercera. Wyd. Stowarzyszenie WK Borussia, Olsztyn 2003
PRESERVED – SAVED? ON THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND MANNERS OF ITS SHAPING ED. BY IWONA LIŻEWSKA AND WIKTOR KNERCER, PUBLISHED BY STOWARZYSZENIE WK BORUSSIA, OLSZTYN 2003
Autorzy:
Sadowska-Mazur, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538919.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Warmia i Mazury
krajobraz kulturowy
dziedzictwo kulturowe
architektura dworska
architektura ludowa
krajobraz wiejski
Opis:
Preserved – Saved? On the Cultural Landscape and Manners of Its Shaping is a collection of texts – the result of two conferences organised in July 2000 and September 2002 by the Borussia Cultural Community society. The leitmotif of both meetings was the cultural landscape as well as the possibilities of its shaping and protection, while the point of departure was the rural landscape and the region of Warmia and Mazuria. The authors include persons professionally associated with the protection of historical monuments and preservation, as well as the owners of historical objects. The book is divided into three parts, the first being Historia – Dziedzictwo – Zmiany (History – Legacy – Changes), bringing the reader closer to the cultural legacy of Warmia and Mazuria, not merely the historical aspects but also from the present-day perspective. The second part, entitled Współczesność – Projekty – Realizacje (Contemporaneity – Projects – Realisations), contains texts about the discussed issues on a local level as well as a wider, supraregional one. Finally, the part on Siedziby – Losy – Ludzie (Residences – History – People) describes the personal experiences of various people who decided to tame the alien element and begin a new life under an “old roof”. The merits of the books include its handy size, hard cover, and lavish illustrations. The publication is enhanced by biogrammes of authors, presented at the end. The only flaw is the absence of topographic references. Although the major part of the publication deals with Warmia and Mazuria, it also contains texts about Lithuania or Sweden. The book is addressed to the lovers of Warmia and Mazuria, historians of art, conservators and laymen.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 3-4; 154-156
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„THE EUROPEAN HERITAGE NETWORK” Spotkanie robocze w Chaumont- sur-Loire, Francja, 24-27 września 2008 r.
“THE EUROPEAN HERITAGE NETWORK” A Working Conference in Chaumont- sur-Loire, France, 24 -27 September 2008
Autorzy:
Furmanik, Barbara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535708.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
HEREIN
The European Heritage Network
dziedzictwo kulturowe
dziedzictwo archeologiczne
zabytkowe parki I ogrody
ochrona historycznych parków
Opis:
Asuccessive working meeting of a group involved in the HEREIN – The European Heritage Network – project took place on 24-27 September 2008 at the Chaumont residence in France. The prime topic of the meeting was the heretofore activity of HEREIN.54 The participants discussed the place and defensive strategies for the protection of cultural heritage within the policies pursued in Europe and those of particular member states of the European Union. Moreover, they presented new projects realised and planned as part of HEREIN and a scheme for the further evelopment of a HEREIN data base. Particular attention was paid to the role played by HEREIN as an instrument for monitoring and supporting conventions concerning cultural heritage, proclaimed by the Council of Europe. The meeting also involved a discussion on the historical parks, gardens and cultural landscape of Europe. The Polish delegation presented its country’s conservation policy relating to the protection of historical parks and gardens as well as tasks and projects concerning assorted monuments in Lithuania and Ukraine. The conference participants toured castles in Chaumont and Blois as well as the recently designed gardens in Chaumont, created as part of the “Des jardins en partage” Festival International des Jardins 2008.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 1; 6-8
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gdański Ośrodek Ochrony Dóbr Kultury - geneza koncepcji, założenia programowe
THE GDAŃSK CENTRE FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL VALUES — THE ORIGINS OF THE IDEA, PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS
Autorzy:
Domańska, Hanna
Kruszelnicki, Zygmunt
Wolska, Ewa
Wolski, Jerzy
Zeidler, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536157.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona dóbr kultury
dobro kultury
dziedzictwo kulturowe
środowisko kulturowe
Gdański Ośrodek Ochrony Dóbr Kultury
Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Opis:
A guideline for activities in the field of the protection and schaping of cultural life in Gdańsk voivodship was provided by the resolution o f the plenary session o f the Voivodship Committee of the P.Z.P.R. (the Polish United Workers’ Party). The session was held in 1972 and it concerned the main trends for the development of culture in Gdańsk voivodship until the year o f 1980. When executing a work program adopted at the session there arose a conception to set up the Gdańsk Centre for the Protection of Cultural Values as a conservation body o f scientific and research nature. The idea was brought into life in June 1975 on the foundations of the Office for the Research and Documentation o f Historic Monuments in Gdańsk voivodship, in existence since 1970. The newly-opened Centre found its seat in a historic Turret of Anchorers’ (Baszta Kotwiczników). In future the seat will be moved to the granary of „Mały and Duży Groddeck” at Chmielna street. As the guidelines for its work the Gdańsk Centre for the Protection o f Cultural Values has adopted two programs. The program minimum assumes a full recording of monuments in Gdańsk voivodship. A starting point for this program was a very long experience and output o f the people and organizations involved in the problem. The program maximum envisaged the expansion of the earlier program with research and experimental studies aimed at an overall elaboration of historic monuments conceived, in the broad sense, as „cultural values”. According to the definition adopted temporarily by the research team o f the Centre, a cultural value is a set of objects that have a definite value, function, date o f the origin, style and that are the product o f human wilful activities in a creative process. The cultural value is an integral part of both universal culture and of the culture of a specific community and proves its development at a given historical stage. The „value” conceived in that sense is a testimony to the history o f the nation and has a great cognitive value for present generations. Being a genuine reflection o f the social existence, its civilisation and ideology, the cultural value is a factor affecting, i.a., the awareness o f a contemporary man, for whom the knowledge of manifestations o f culture in the past helps to get to know and to comprehend the present age. The notion of „cultural value” is inseparably linked with two other concepts, namely „cultural heritage” (i.e. cultural legacy of the bygone society) and „cultural environment”. The latter concept denotes groups o f people producing cultural values and also places in which the value is created and with which it is inseparably connected. And it is that second aspect o f the problem, conceived in the broadest sense, that makes the focus o f interests and research works carried out by the Gdańsk Centre for the Protection of Cultural Values. Hence, the term „cultural environment” covered landscape including all natural and man-made elements. The following sections have already been set up for the full execution of the adopted programs: the Team of the Monuments Research and Documentation Workshop, the Team o f the Conservation Workshop for Works o f Art, Documentation Department, Servicing Workshops, Independent Post for Building and Investment, Independent Post for Defence and Protection of Historic Monuments as well as Finance and Administration and Economic Department. The departments group experts in different fields, to mention only architects, art and architecture historians, engineers. They also maintain a close contact with research workers and cultural organizations in the Baltic Coast and in the country.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 3; 161-167
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków - instytucja ochrony dziedzictwa narodowego
CENTRE FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS — AN INSTITUTION PROTECTING NATIONAL HERITAGE
Autorzy:
Kunkel, Robert M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536110.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
ewidencja dóbr kultury w Polsce
inwentarz narodowy dóbr kultury
dziedzictwo kulturowe
Opis:
The exchange and transformations of man’s material surrounding is a natural phenomenon, but societies wish to simultaneously preserve the fullest possible knowledge about their past. The physical salvaging and conservation of all old buildings or objects exceeds the potential of even the most prosperous countries. Inventories and documentation of cultural heritage remain therefore, the basic conservation undertakings, and in the case of impermanent objects or those not appreciated for their “values”, they remain probably the most essential activity possible. In the form of drawings, photographs or descriptions they make it possible to relay information about non-extant buildings and transformed towns. Considering that certain domains of scientific research, such as archeological excavations conducted by means of traditional methods are an intentional and sanctioned form of destroying select fragments of national legacy, the importance of their thorough documentation is ascribed even greater significance. In the cases of certain cultural property, which by its very nature is transitory and impermanent, such as a concert or a theatrical spectacle, its record does not prolong the existence of the given phenomenon, but merely recalls it. Other forms of artistic activity recognise exclusively the documentation of a given work, as in the case of theatrical spectacles broadcast on television or studio music recordings. It is not the spectacle itself but its record which is protected by copyright, and can be frequently copied on assorted carriers and recreated. The documentation of historical monuments in normal conditions serves as material for scientific studies and research concerning the given monument as well as the foundation for conservation projects. In instances of natural calamities or wartime devastation, such documentation may serve the reconstruction of, at the very least, the outer form of those damaged objects which constitute an essential part of natural heritage. In traditional conservation circles, attached to the “cult of substance”, launched by Ruskin, the conception of documented records conceived as a substitute for the conservation of the very substance of cultural property, produces considerable resistance. The prime task of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments is to conduct a record of cultural property in Poland, constantly brought up to date and supplemented. The central files encompass all historical and conservation data about mobile and immobile monuments registered in Poland (as long as they are not featured in museums, libraries or archives possessing their own inventories). This is the nature of the objectives of institutions documenting cultural heritage throughout the whole of Europe, and creating information resources which serve the comprehension and interpretation of assorted elements of the cultural landscape of our continent. In order to render comparative opinions or conclusions possible, it is necessary to accept a uniform and generally understood manner of documentary registration. This purpose is served by special systems, such as the so-called Core Data Index, accepted as a European Union recommendation for architectural and construction objects, or the Polish system of registering archeological sites, known as AZP (the Archeological Photograph of Poland). Their joint feature is the fact that the process of filing is entrusted to specialists, and the treatment of knowledge about historical monuments is envisaged as common property. This has been the heretofore praxis in Poland. The registration and documentation of cultural property was entrusted to services dealing with the protection of historical monuments, while a specialised central cultural institution was responsible for the co-ordination of those operations. At its thirteenth session held in Paris in 1964 the UNESCO General Conference recommended that each member state should prepare “a national inventory of cultural p roperty in its territory” (§10), confirming this proposition at its sixteenth session, also organised in Paris (1970) and in the text of the Convention passed at the time (Article 5. b). Additionally, a consecutive (seventeenth) session formulated A recommendation concerning the protection o f national cultural and natural legacy, whose point 13. b declares that: “Member states (...) should establish in their territory specialist services whose tasks (...) would entail predominantly preparing an inventory o f protected heritage and establishing a specialised documentary s e r v i c e points 29 and 30 stated: “Each member state should prepare as soon as possible an inventory o f its cultural and natural legacy, and include into this inventory also property which — albeit without particular value — comprises an inseparable fragment o f the environment to which it belongs”, and “that the outcome o f inventory work (...) should be constantly brought up to date and arranged in suitable order”. The value of all collections and databases, whose gathering required long-term activity consisting of the co-operation of numerous specialists and institutions, depends on the stability of criteria for the selection of information and its recording. Such an approach offers the possibility of comparing particular records and statistical research. All campaigns based on subjective legal-official or political criteria, with changing opinions about “historical features” and the state conservation policy, together with the tendency, natural among p articular recorders of national legacy, towards expanding bases concerning problems of interest to them (often only to them), introduce chaos into the image of cultural legacy. Moreover, it is important to conduct such bases in a holistic manner, encompassing the whole country, and to manage them via a central institution. Although cultural heritage, which is composed of elements introduced by local communities (both in the past and today) is a moral duty of the whole nation, the process of multiplying knowledge about its resources cannot be borne only by particular counties. Contrary to the proclivities of part of the administration or scientists, the gathered information should be accessible to all those interested, in accordance to regulations binding also other public collections. The awareness of all those facts makes it possible to guarantee, not only formally but also for the sake of suitably conceived social interest, the constitutional right of Polish citizens towards their national legacy, and to wish the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments successive decades of undisturbed and useful work. Robert M. Kunkel Vice-Director of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 1; 1-3
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zarządzanie dziedzictwem niematerialnym Górali Babiogórskich poprzez animację społeczno-kulturalną. Raport z badań etnograficznych
Managing the intangible cultural heritage of the Babia Góra Highlanders through socio-cultural animation. Report on ethnographic research
Autorzy:
Laszczka, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151107.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
animacja
edukacja
etnografia
niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
zarządzanie
animation
education
ethnography
intangible cultural heritage
management
Opis:
Artykuł stanowi jakościowy raport z etnograficznych badań terenowych przeprowadzonych w latach 2018–2019 do pracy licencjackiej pod tytułem Zarządzanie dziedzictwem niematerialnym Górali Babiogórskich, obronionej z wyróżnieniem w Instytucie Kultury UJ. Za podstawę badań uznano dyskurs niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego, w tym problematykę zarządzania dziedzictwem na terenie Podbabiogórza i w Babiogórskim Centrum Kultury im. Urszuli Janickiej-Krzywdy w Zawoi. Autorka poszukuje odpowiedzi na pytanie badawcze: poprzez jakie wartości i idee, znajdujące odzwierciedlenie w konkretnych działaniach, powinno się zarządzać dziedzictwem niematerialnym regionu w instytucjach publicznych, aby było ono nie tylko chronione, ale również kreatywnie rozwijane i w konsekwencji przekazywane kolejnym pokoleniom. Posługując się etnografią jako tradycją metodologiczną, ustalono, że sprawczość publicznych instytucji kultury w ochronie dziedzictwa niematerialnego możliwa jest dzięki długotrwałemu pobudzaniu społeczności inicjatywami z zakresu animacji społeczno-kulturalnej do współdzielenia wartości i współtworzenia własnej kultury. W studium wyszczególniono działania: zachęcanie do partycypacji w przywracaniu kultury, kultywowanie jej elementów i transmitowanie ich poprzez empirię, stosowanie intertekstualnych przetworzeń dziedzictwa, inicjowanie kreatywnych i interaktywnych wydarzeń aktywizujących oraz edukowanie przystosowane do odbiorców, nienachalne w formie. Wybór analizowanego przypadku instytucjonalnego okazał się zasadny z uwagi na animacyjny i edukacyjny charakter działalności oraz walory kulturowe.
The article is a qualitative report on ethnographic field research conducted in 2018–2019 for a bachelor’s dissertation on Managing the Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Babia Góra Highlanders, which was defended with distinction at the Institute of Culture of the Jagiellonian University. The discourse on intangible cultural heritage was considered to be the basis for the research work, including the issue of heritage management in the Babia Góra region at the Urszula Janicka-Krzywda Babia Góra Cultural Centre in Zawoja. The research question that the author is seeking to answer is through which values and ideas, reflected in specific activities, should the intangible heritage of the region be managed in public institutions, so that it is not only protected, but also creatively developed and, consequently, passed on to future generations. Making use of ethnography as the methodological framework, it was determined that the public cultural institutions may be agents in the protection of intangible heritage through the long-term activation of communities with initiatives in the field of socio-cultural animation in order to share values and participate in the development of their culture. The study specified the following activities: encouraging participation in reviving heritage, cultivating elements thereof and transmitting them through empirical knowledge, using intertextual transformations of heritage, initiating creative and interactive events, and education geared towards the recipients that is not intrusive in form. The choice of cultural case under analysis proved to be justifiable in view of the motivational and educational nature of the activity and cultural values.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2022, 2; 169-186
0029-8247
2956-6606
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
"Monumentum", T. IX, 1973 : [recenzja]
Autorzy:
Lenard, Barbara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537971.pdf
Data publikacji:
1974
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
"Monumentum" 1973
zapobieganie w ochronie środowiska
konserwacja zabytków w Rumunii
zabezpieczanie kamienia
dziedzictwo kulturowe Hiszpanii
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1974, 3; 242-245
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
KRAKOWSKIE SPOTKANIA Z INSPIRE
CRACOW MEETINGS WITH INSPIRE
Autorzy:
Kmicik, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539643.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
„Dziedzictwo kulturowe jako element geoprzestrzeni”
INSPIRE
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego
geoinformacja
System Informacji Przestrzennej
www.gismazowsza.pl
GIS
Opis:
On 17-19 May 2007 the Town Office of Cracow organised a third symposium from the ”Cracow Meetings with INSPIRE” cycle, whose leading topic was ”Cultural heritage as an element of geo-space”. The conference atttracted about 200 representatives of a widely understood protection of the cultural heritage and geo-information. This large and greatly varied group proved conducive for the development of contacts and the establishment of interdsiciplinary and interministerial coopoeration, which remains the essence of INSPIRE. An excellent example of this approach is the progressing collabiration between the National Heritage Board of Poland (KOBiDZ) and the Land Surveyor Office of the Voivodeship of Mazovia, expressed in a paper prepared by the GIS team working at KOBiDZ and dealing with the implementation of contenporary geo-infirmation solutions connected with the inventories and protection of non-movable historical monuments. The conference was also attended by representatives of the Cracow Regional Centre for the Study and Documentation of Historical Monuments, who read a paper on the theoretical premises of monitoring sites of particular importance for Polish cultural heritrage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 1; 16-17
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ZAMEK CZORSZTYN ZABYTKOWA RUINA W PARKU NARODOWYM
CZORSZTYN CASTLE HISTORICAL RUIN IN A NATIONAL PARK
Autorzy:
Stępień, Piotr M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538794.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Zamek Czorsztyn
zabytkowa ruina
warownia
Baszta Baranowskiego
Park Narodowy w Pieninach
dziedzictwo kulturowe
uroczysko
zabezpieczenie ruin
Alfred Majewski
Zieleniec
Opis:
Researchers have acknowledged that the oldest fortress on the site of the present-day castle was built during the third quarter of the thirteenth century and became known as “Wronin”. The castle named “Czorsztyn”, expanded and redesigned upon numerous occasions starting with the fourteenth century, played the part of a custom house, the seat of the office of a starosta not associated with the castletown, and a royal residence located next to an important route to Hungary. In 1629-1643 starosta Jan Baranowski, the count of Jastrzębiec, basically redesigned the object. The downfall of the castle began with its devastation in 1734-1735, and final collapse was caused by a fire which broke out in 1790. From that time on, the castle remained a ruin. This was the state in which it was discovered by nineteenth-century tourists and artists, becoming part of the Polish Romantic tradition. Attempts at preserving the ruins were made already during the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century by the owners of the castle, members of the Drohojowski family. A natural reserve was created in 1921 after rare (endemic) species of plants were found amidst the ruins. During the 1950s limited preservation work was conducted after the monument was taken over by the State Treasury. Changes in the surrounding environment caused by the construction of an artificial water reservoir made it necessary to embark upon wider conservation undertakings, realised since 1992 by the present-day administrator of the monument, i. e. the Pieniński National Park, according to projects by Piotr M. Stępień, an architect, and Dr. Stanisław Karczmarczyk, an engineer. The basic conservation premise accepted by all the variants and stages of the project is to preserve the characteristic silhouette of the ruins of Czorsztyn Castle in view of its above mentioned role played in Romantic tradition and connections with the protected landscape of the Pieniny Mts. The process of securing relics uncovered in the course of research and opening the ruins to visitors calls for the introduction of roofs, stairs and gangplanks within the object. From the viewpoint of construction, the basic method of protection proved to be the recreation of selected elements of the historical ceilings, arches, etc., supplemented by means of injections and roof bolting in the case of threatened fragments of the walls. The author lists the reasons and consequences of resorting to this particular method. Heretofore efforts have managed to maintain the accepted conservation premises. The correctness of the selected conservation trend is confirmed by the large numbers of visitors and their approval for the object. By using the example of Czorsztyn, the author analysed the conservation of historical ruins, claiming that the threats posed to historical ruins include the doctrine of non-intervention and unhampered fantasy. As a rule, a radically conceived principle of nonintervention signifies consent to the annihilation of the historical ruin in the near future. A similar threat is posed by reconstruction which enters into the domain of fantasy, unsupported by iconography or the outcome of architectural research. By restoring the utilitarian and technical value of the given object, such reconstruction destroys its historical merits, sometimes irreversibly. A wide field of professional solutions located between those two radical attitudes, makes it possible to preserve an object without losing any of its historical qualities.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2005, 1; 5-28
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bogumiła J. Rouba, Pielęgnacja świątyni i innych zabytków. Książka nie tylko dla księży, wyd. 2 rozszerzone, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, Toruń 2014, ss. 508
Autorzy:
Mróz, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539076.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Pielęgnacja świątyni i innych zabytków
Książka nie tylko dla księży
zabytkowe budowle sakralne
problemy dotykające zabytkowe budowle
dziedzictwo kulturowe
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 1; 218-219
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola gmin w zagospodarowaniu zabytkowych nieruchomości na Dolnym Śląsku
The role of communes in the use and management of historic real properties in Lower Silesia
Autorzy:
Merta-Staszczak, Adriana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537760.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
zabytki
ochrona i użytkowanie zabytków
gminy
Dolny Śląsk
cultural heritage
monuments
protection and use of monuments
communes
Lower Silesia
Opis:
Gminy są właścicielami około 20 proc. obiektów zabytkowych na Dolnym Śląsku, a ich zadaniem jest ten zasób chronić oraz wykorzystywać na potrzeby turystyczne, społeczne i edukacyjne. Ze względu na różnorodność i dużą liczbę zabytków jest to przedsięwzięcie trudne w realizacji. Głównymi barierami są: brak funduszy, zły stan techniczny budynków, wandalizm, ale też w wielu przypadkach niedostateczna wiedza i zaangażowanie osób odpowiedzialnych za zachowanie dziedzictwa kulturowego. Celem artykułu jest analiza działań podjętych przez wybrane gminy wiejskie, miejskie i miejsko-wiejskie Dolnego Śląska w zakresie wykorzystania zabytków nieruchomych zlokalizowanych na ich terenie, zabezpieczenia i zachowania, odnowy, adaptacji do nowych funkcji oraz udostępniania mieszkańcom i turystom. Ważnymi aspektami tych działań jest wdrażanie projektów z wykorzystaniem środków krajowych i unijnych oraz podejmowanie współpracy z innymi jednostkami, szczególnie ze stowarzyszeniami i administracją państwową.
Communes own approx. 20 per cent of historic monuments in Lower Silesia. Their mission is to protect them and utilise them for tourist, social, and educational purposes. Due to the large number and diversity of monuments, it is an objective that is difficult to accomplish. The main obstacles are: lack of funds, poor technical condition of buildings, and vandalism, but in many cases, also insufficient knowledge and involvement of persons responsible for the preservation of cultural heritage. The aim of this article is to analyse activities undertaken by selected rural, urban, and rural-urban communes of Lower Silesia in respect of making use of immovable monuments located within their area, securing, preserving, and restoring those monuments, and adapting them to serve new purposes, as well as making them available to the locals and to tourists. Important aspects of such activities are the implementation of projects using national and EU funds and cooperation with other entities, in particular associations and public administration.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 2; 191-217
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zabytkowe wyposażenie śląskich rezydencji w latach 1945-1949 w świetle polskich materiałów archiwalnych
Historic equipment of Silesian residences in 1945-1949 in the light of Polish archival materials
Autorzy:
Merta-Staszczak, Adriana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1927144.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
zabytki ruchome
zabytkowe nieruchomości
rezydencje
rewindykacja
Dolny Śląsk
cultural heritage
movable monuments
historic real estate
residences
revindication
Lower Silesia
Opis:
Pierwsze lata powojenne były okresem kluczowym w odzyskiwaniu wywożonych podczas okupacji i rozproszonych po całym regionie dóbr kultury z kolekcji prywatnych, muzealnych oraz kościelnych. W warunkach odbudowy państwa i ustanawiania nowych, polskich struktur administracyjnych w sprawy kultury oraz dziedzictwa narodowego zaangażowane było niewielkie środowisko złożone m.in. z historyków, muzealników i konserwatorów zabytków, ale również zwykłych urzędników. Grupie tej brakowało zarówno środków finansowych, jak i zasobów ludzkich, dlatego jej działania miały bardzo ograniczone rozmiary. Skupiały się przeważnie wokół miast powiatowych, muzeów regionalnych oraz zabytków uważanych za najcenniejsze i najważniejsze. Chociaż wkład uczestników tych poszukiwań w zabezpieczenie zabytków ruchomych był niezwykle ważny, często nie docierali oni do zlokalizowanych daleko od ośrodków miejskich zespołów zamkowych, dworskich i pałacowych lub przybywali zbyt późno, aby ocalić czasowo zmagazynowane tam zbiory. Przez kolejne lata po 1945 roku w wielu majątkach stacjonowały wojska radzieckie, które prowadziły regularny wywóz rezydencjonalnego wyposażenia lub niszczyły go przed swoim wyjazdem. Dopóki jednak te miejsca znajdowały się w administracji sowieckiej, polscy urzędnicy nie mogli oszacować skali tych zniszczeń. Opuszczone przez dawnych właścicieli i niepilnowane rezydencje były też przeszukiwane i rabowane przez szabrowników i wandali, a znajdujące się w nich mienie najczęściej bezpowrotnie ginęło.
The first post-war years were a key period in the recovery of private, museum and church cultural property collections that were taken away during the occupation and scattered throughout the region. In the context of the state reconstruction and building new Polish administrative structures, a small group of people was involved in issues of culture and national heritage, including historians, museum workers, and conservators, as well as ordinary officials. The group lacked both financial and human resources, so its activities were very limited in scale. They mainly focused on district towns, regional museums and monuments considered as the most valuable and most important. Although the contribution of people engaged in this search to the protection of movable monuments was extremely important, they often did not reach castles, palaces and manors located far from the urban centres or arrived too late to save collections stored there temporarily. After 1945, in many estates, Soviet troops were stationed, which systematically carried the residential equipment away or destroyed it before leaving. However, until these sites were under the Soviet administration, Polish officials could not estimate the scale of damages. Abandoned by former owners and unmanaged residences were also searched and robbed by looters and vandals, and the property located there was usually lost forever.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2018, 2; 133-155
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 24

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies