Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "adaptacja zabytku" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Rola Działu Analiz Konserwatorskich w realizacji zadań statutowych Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa
The role of the Conservation Analyses Department in the performance of statutory tasks of the National Heritage Board of Poland
Autorzy:
Jagielska, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538298.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Dział Analiz Konserwatorskich
KOBiDZ
Krajowy Ośrodek Badań i Dokumentacji Zabytków
NID
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
ekspertyzy konserwatorskie
skreślenie z rejestru zabytków
adaptacja zabytku
rejestr zabytków
CARARE
standard dokumentacji
pomnik historii
Lista Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO
Akademia Nieświeska
Opis:
The Conservation Analyses Department was established by the order of the Director of the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments dated 6 June 2010. The Department comprised the Team of Experts and the Conservation Policy Formation Workshop. The Department co-ordinates and supervises work connected with the preparation of opinions and expertises regarding the protection of non-movable and movable monuments for public administration authorities – the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, Voivodeship Offices for Monument Protection and their branches and local government conservators. It carries out its tasks with the help of local divisions representing the National Heritage Board of Poland. The definite majority of issued opinions concerns the evaluation of the level of preservation of the value of historic objects or areas during administrative procedures being conducted by the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage with regard to deletions from the register of monuments. The Conservation Analyses Department co-ordinates the implementation of the procedure for acknowledgement of a historic object as a history monument and participates in work regarding the creation and dissemination of standards of documentation, research and conservation of historic objects. The activity of the Department in the field of protection of historic parks and gardens is particularly worth mentioning. It includes, among others, study and design works carried out in Branicki’s Garden in Białystok from 2006 till 2009 and the preparation of conservation requests and the resulting projects of regeneration of the palace park in Białowieża and the park in Trzebiny. The palace & park layout in Trzebiny is currently administered by the National Heritage Board of Poland – the Local Workshop in Trzebiny. An important task ordered by the Minister of Culture and National Heritage is the management of the regeneration of Muskau Park. Over 20 years’ period of regeneration works is a significant yet still fragmentary process of restoration of the full historical value of the park. The Institute is also responsible for the creation and putting into common use of standards of documentation, elaborations and manuals regarding the protection of cultural heritage that are addressed to a wide group of recipients, an example of which is the Methodological guide to the elaboration of communal monument care programmes. The international co-operation with Eastern states has been carried out by NHBP and its predecessors for many years, including the „Nieśwież Academy” Postgraduate Summer School and cooperation with the Trakai Historical National Park in Lithuania. All activities being handled by the Conservation Analyses Department of the National Heritage Board of Poland are subject and may become subject to modifications, depending on the orders of the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, the needs of voivodeship monument conservators and other institutions and the emerging topics that must be solved urgently. Currently the Conservation Analyses Department employs 14 persons. They build an interdisciplinary team consisting of a group of historians of art, monument experts – conservators, landscape architects, an architect and a lawyer – persons with a large professional experience and significant achievements.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 101-110
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zagospodarowanie zabytku nieruchomego na cele użytkowe w świetle art. 25 Ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami
Development of an Immovable Monument for Utility Purposes in the Light of Article 25 of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments
Autorzy:
Brudnicki, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21150979.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zabytek nieruchomy
adaptacja zabytku
funkcja zabytku
program prac konserwatorskich
opieka nad zabytkami
zagospodarowanie zabytku na cele użytkowe
dostosowanie zabytku nieruchomego dla osób ze szczególnymi potrzebami
program zagospodarowania zabytku
dokumentacja konserwatorska
immovable monument
adaptation of a monument
function of a monument
conservation documentation
conservation works programme
monument development programme
guardianship of monuments
development of a monument for utility purposes
adaptation of an immovable monument for person with special needs
Opis:
Przedmiotem artykułu jest analiza prawna problematyki zagospodarowania na cele użytkowe zabytku nieruchomego, która uregulowana jest w art. 25 Ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami. Przepis ten, choć dotyczy ważnego doktrynalnie zagadnienia adaptacji zabytku do nowych funkcji, paradoksalnie jest rzadko stosowany przez organy ochrony zabytków, nie jest też należycie dostrzegany w piśmiennictwie prawniczym i konserwatorskim. W artykule prześledzono rozwój prawnej regulacji kwestii zagospodarowania zabytku nieruchomego na cele użytkowe. W ramach analizy przepisu art. 25 Ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami dokonano wykładni pojęcia „zagospodarowania zabytku nieruchomego na cele użytkowe”, scharakteryzowano ciążące na właścicielu lub posiadaczu zabytku obowiązki związane z planowanym zagospodarowaniem zabytku na cele użytkowe, a także określono formę, w jakiej wojewódzki konserwator zabytków dokonuje uzgodnienia programu prac konserwatorskich i programu zagospodarowania zabytku nieruchomego wraz z otoczeniem. Efektem prowadzonej analizy jest próba ustalenia ratio legis art. 25 Ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami, ocena skuteczności tej regulacji, a także sformułowanie określonych postulatów de lege ferenda służących zapewnieniu wszechstronnej oceny możliwości adaptacji zabytku do nowej funkcji i pełniejszego niż w standardowym przypadku rozpoznania zabytku pod względem historycznym i technicznym.
The subject of the article is the legal analysis of issues of the development of an immovable monument for utility purposes which is regulated in Article 25 of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments. This provision, although it concerns the important doctrine of adapting a monument to new functions, is paradoxically rarely used by monument protection authorities, nor is it properly recognised in legal and conservation literature. The article looks at the legal development of regulations on the development of an immovable monument for utility purposes. As part of the analysis of Article 25 of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments, the term “development of an immovable monument for utility purposes” was interpreted, the obligations incumbent on the owner or holder of the monument related to the planned development of the monument for utility purposes were described, and the form in which the voivodship monument protection officer agrees the conservation works programme and the programme for the development of the immovable monument along with its surroundings was specified. The result of the analysis is an attempt to determine the ratio legis of Article 25 of the Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Guardianship of Monuments, to assess the effectiveness of this regulation, as well as to formulate specific postulates de lege ferenda aimed at ensuring a comprehensive assessment of the possibility of adapting the monument to a new function and a more complete recognition, than in the standard case, of a monument in historical and technical terms.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2021, 1; 167-216
0029-8247
2956-6606
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tak zwany Zajazd Kościuszkowski w Krakowie. Burzliwe dzieje jednego zabytku
So-called Kosciuszko Inn in Krakow. The turbulent history of a historical site
Autorzy:
Dettloff, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536551.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Kraków
Prądnik Biały
Zajazd Kościuszkowski
zniszczenie zabytku
odbudowa
rekonstrukcja
wywłaszczenie
adaptacja
autentyzm
substancja zabytkowa
Opis:
The theme of this article is the history of the inn known as the Kosciuszko Inn - the former country inn now located within the boundaries of Krakow. Built in 1752, it used to belong to the historical complex of Krakow bishops’ mansion buildings in Bialy Pradnik. Together with the opposite building, it is one of the few remaining elements of the impressive Late Baroque mansion project. The building survived until the 20th century without any major alterations, preserving its 18th-century-style architectural shape. After World War II, its fate was typical of historical sites in the People’s Republic of Poland. Confiscated from private owners, it was used for residential purposes and gradually fell into decline. The building’s condition temporarily improved after the major restoration that took place between 1951 and 1953. Some of the elements and details of the original style, lost over the centuries, were restored. Since 1970s, it had been planned to once again overhaul the building and adapt it to new functions, but the plans never materialised. In 2000, the vacated and devastated building burnt down. Before the fire, the building’s new owner had obtained approval for the concept of the overhaul and adaptation, but he failed to take any further actions. Neither did he comply with the order to secure the building after the fire. Given the situation, at the initiative of the Historic Preservation Unit of the Krakow City Office, the site was expropriated by the gmina. The legal basis for administrative actions was Article 37.1 of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act of 15 February 1962. Expropriation by the gmina enabled reconstruction of the destroyed historical building in 2006. Unfortunately, due to the high degree of destruction of the stone walls, it was decided to dismantle them almost entirely and reconstruct using new materials (only the middle part of the front wall was left). The site, even though devoid of most of its original substance, was restored to the landscape and, what is important, still plays the role of a vital component of the historical complex of palace buildings. The exterior architectural shape and details were reconstructed to resemble those of the original 18th century building. Inside, a part of the former layout was preserved, while the rest of the building was adapted to suit the new functions. Currently, the building is used by the District Cultural Centre.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2013, 1-4; 5-22
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
POGLĄDY MŁODZIEŻY LICEÓW WARSZAWSKICH NA TEMAT ZABYTKÓW: CZY TEORIE KONSERWATORSKIE SĄ ZGODNE Z OCZEKIWANIAMI SPOŁECZNYMI?
THE VIEWS OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS FROM WARSAW ABOUT HISTORICAL MONUMENTS: ARE CONSERVATION THEORIES CONCURRENT WITH SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS?
Autorzy:
Kobyliński, Zbigniew
Paczuska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535891.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
poglądy młodzieży na temat zabytków
badanie opinii społecznej na temat zabytków
współczesne funkcje obiektów zabytkowych
adaptacja zabytków do nowych funkcji
społeczne role zabytków
autentyczność zabytku
Opis:
Finding out about social opinions pertaining to the need for the existence of historical monuments, their value for society, and socially accepted ways of proceeding with such monuments, is of crucial significance for all sorts of programmes dealing with the protection and conservation of historical monuments. If conservation undertakings, based on the opinions of experts and doctrinal principles, are to be remain at odds with social expectations then their effectiveness will be minimal. The process of becoming familiar with views expressed by society should become a point of departure for planning suitable conservation ventures. A poll conducted in 2005 in 17 comprehensive schools in Warsaw became a step towards learning about the knowledge and opinions of Polish youth about historical monuments and the needs and ways of their protection and use. The polls encompassed a total of 1 198 persons in three age groups. Among such questions as the definition of a monument, examples of monuments in the closest environ, Poland, Europe and the world, the need for the protection of historical monuments, the readiness to become involved in activity focused on such protection, etc., the presented article discusses problems reflecting an essential and highly disturbing divergence between the views accepted by the theoreticians of the protection and conservation of historical monuments, on the one hand, and the opinions voiced by the secondary schools students from the Polish capital, on the other hand. These issues concern the nature of historical monuments, the purposes that they should serve, whether they should be used for contemporary purposes, and the limits of the authenticity of a monument, not to be crossed in the course of conservation. Pertinent questions were intentionally formulated in such a way as to test whether the young respondents accept the opinions of contemporary theoreticians of conservation and studies dealing with historical monuments. The overwhelming majority of the respondents supports a vision of historical monuments as isolated, well-guarded objects, serving predominantly tourists, and without the introduction of contemporary economic functions. The answers also suggest a total divergence of the opinions of society and experts as regards suitable methods of conserving seriously damaged monuments. A large part of the respondents (58,88%) spoke in favour of a full and faithful reconstruction resorting to contemporary techniques and accessible material. The second largest group of respondents supports the preservation of “permanent ruins“ (31,95%), and only a small group (7,39%) approved of operations which today numerous theoreticians of conservation regard as most appropriate, i. e. a symbolic preservation of a monument in the form of a historical reference within contemporary architecture (so-called retroversion).
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 2; 81-92
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies