Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "work value" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Wartość pracy w życiu bezdomnych
    The Value of Work in the Life of the Homeless
    Autorzy:
    Babiarz, Renata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1857592.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2002
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    wartość pracy
    nauczanie Kościoła
    bezrobotni
    bezdomni
    value of work
    teaching of the Church
    the unemployed
    the homeless
    Opis:
    The paper shows a theoretical reflection and empirical research of the value of work, as it is perceived in the teaching of the Church, but also shows the attitude adopted by the people who are unemployed. According to the basic assumptions of the doctrine of the Church, the subject-related character of work has been stressed here. It is man who is its creator and addressee, therefore its value is not merely limited to ensure living conditions. At the same time, the manner of „defining” the value of work is subjectively characterized, in respect of social circumstances and the personal situation of those who are to assess and approve of work. The paper describes the social circumstances of the unemployed, as well as the causes of this unemployment in the socio-political breakthrough in Poland. On the basis of trial research among the unemployed and homeless men from the Brother Albert Hospice for the Homeless in Lublin, the situation of those people has been analyzed. Among other things, not only the very manner of assessment of work has been analyzed, but also the circumstances under which the respondents lost it, the actual motives why they search for a job, and what obstacles they have in doing it. It follows from the research that the causes of the present situation of the people under study are not only the social conditions that are the reasons why they are unemployed. We have to take into consideration their personalities; they are often passive and adopt a pessimistic attitude towards reality and their own chances. The author draws pedagogic conclusions concerning the aid to the unemployed and homeless (for these two situations are most often consequently linked).
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2001, 2; 121-158
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Godność osoby ludzkiej i obiektywne normy moralne jako reguły w działalności gospodarczej
    Dignity of the human person and objective moral norms as rules in economy
    Autorzy:
    Mazurek, Franciszek Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1852622.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    osoba ludzka
    godność
    normy moralne
    prawa człowieka
    wartości uniwersalne
    wartość pracy ludzkiej
    bezrobocie
    human person
    dignity
    moral norms
    human rights
    universal values
    value of human work
    unemployment
    Opis:
    The author subjects to revision the economic liberalism supporters’ views, according to which there is no room for universal moral norms in the area of economy. The conception of homo economicus accepted in economy and the exclusive rule of profit are a manifestation of reductionism. The conviction that the free competition – free market – acts mechanically and impersonally and solves all economic-social problems in the best way is basically incorrect. In free competition there are positive and negative elements. Free competition – “yes, but what kind?” In the article a possibly complete picture of man is shown. Man is a reasonable creature, he is internally free and able to recognize good and evil (owing to his conscience) and owing to this he is the most perfect being in the created world. In his nature, man is a social being (ens sociale); a spiritual-bodily unity; he is not completely actualized but he is open to development; he is a religious and working creature (laborem exercens, homo economicus); he is able to do good, devote oneself to others, to build just – albeit not ideal –systems: legal, cultural, social and economic. But man is also able to do evil: to kill others, to steal, to lie, to wage wars, to commit acts of terrorism and of genocide, to build concentration camps, to manipulate the needs and mentality of whole societies and to enslave others by means of mass media – that is to form a one-dimension man. In the theological-biblical language this is called sinfulness of the human nature. And finally, man is capable of – as H. Marcuse writes – “scientific idiotism”. The highest value is the inborn, n a t u r a l, dignity of the human person, which is pointed to by his mind, inner freedom and conscience. Man is created in God’s image (imago Dei). Christ’s incarnation and redemption of man show his s u p e r n a t u r a l dignity. This is theological-biblical justification. Also philosophical (rational) justification is given. The former one is binding for believers, and the latter is for unbelievers. In the Catholic social teaching both justifications are given. The ontic structure of the human person in itself gives rise to obligations, it is the highest norm. It is defined in the following form: the human person should be respected for himself, because he is a person, and not for any other reason (persona est affirmanda propter se ipsam). The very human person, his dignity, is the fundamental norm of morality that is searched for. The Decalogue, objective and universal moral norms as principles show how to respect and protect the human person. It is not recognizing and complying with moral norms and human rights for themselves that is meant here – art for the art’s sake (pure formalism) – but protection of one’s own dignity and the dignity of every other person. Both moral norms as principles and human rights have been discovered slowly, step by step, but regressions also occur; this especially happened in the 20th and at the beginning of the 21st century. Human persons are the subjects of all communities – the family, the nation, the universal human society (familiae humanae), production and service institutions. The communities do not exist by themselves, but human persons are their foundation. Human persons, and not various systems, are the subject of any activity, for the systems are not persons or super-persons – Super Ego. Hence the thesis put forward by some economists that the system is ruled by an invisible hand is absurd. In human rights three elements are distinguished: their source, contents and protection. These constitute an integral whole. However, identifying a part with the whole (pars pro toto) is a logical mistake. The debate about man’s right to work can be solved after removing this logical mistake and introducing a new term: “the right for work”; showing that work is one of man’s fundamental needs, that it is a universal phenomenon, has a multi-aspectual dimension of values. Work is an anthropological (personal), moral, social, cultural, historical and economic value. Together with the multidimensional value of work the multidimensional evil of unemployment can be seen. There have been various economic models, even in capitalism. After the fall of socialism the thesis is proclaimed that capitalism is the only alternative (logical quantifier). Recognizing the priority of the real capital over work treated as a tool and commodity bought in the so-called work market is the essential feature of capitalism. John Paul II perceives numerous positive elements in capitalism, but he also sees a few negative ones: “We have found out that the thesis saying that after the defeat of real socialism capitalism remains the only model (logical quantifier) of economic organization is unacceptable.” He does not suggest another model, but generally he states that it is “… a society in which there are: freedom of work, enterprise and participation” that is meant here. He adds: “Economy that does not take into consideration the ethical dimension and does not attempt to serve the good of man – each man and the whole man – in fact does not even deserve the name of «economy» understood as reasonable and benevolent management of material resources”. Although he sees positive elements in the process of globalization, he puts forward an imperative demand to base it on the principle of the dignity of the human person and his rights, and the good of the whole human family (familiae humanae). In the area of economy “ … in the field of economy nobody may insult the human dignity without a punishment, which dignity God himself respects greatly” (Leo XIII).
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2006, 34, 1; 19-53
    0137-4176
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Odpowiedzialność jako wartość w pracy socjalnej
    The Responsibility as the Value in a Social Work
    Autorzy:
    Strembska-Kozieł, Martyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2036850.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    praca socjalna
    wartość
    odpowiedzialność
    pracownik socjalny
    klient pomocy społecznej
    social work
    value
    responsibility
    social worker
    clients of social assistance services
    Opis:
    Niniejszy artykuł stanowi wprowadzenie w zagadnienie aksjologii w pracy socjalnej. Praca socjalna, jako działalność profesjonalna, pomocowa i prospołeczna, odwołuje się i dąży do urzeczywistnienia wartości. Celem tego studium, dokonanego na podstawie literatury przedmiotu, jest ukazanie istoty odpowiedzialności w pracy socjalnej. Kategorię tę należy bowiem rozpatrywać z perspektywy uczestników relacji socjalnej – pracownika socjalnego oraz klienta pomocy społecznej. Takie spojrzenie pozwala ująć odpowiedzialność jako problem nie tylko teoretyczny, ale także praktyczny.
    This article is an introduction to the topic of the axiology in a social work. A social work, as a professional, supportive and pro-social activity, appeals to and aspires to the realization of values. The purpose of this study, based on the literature, is to show the essence of responsibility in a social work. This category should be considered from the perspective of the participants in the social relationship − the social worker and the client of social assistance services. Such angle of looking enables us to recognize responsibility as not only theoretical but also practical problem.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Teologiczne; 2018, 65, 1; 107-125
    2353-7272
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Teologiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Personalistyczny wymiar pracy ludzkiej, jako wyznacznik resocjalizacji kobiet, na przykładzie własnych badań
    Personalistic Dimension of Human Work as a Determinant of Women’s Social Rehabilitation, Based on My Own Research
    Autorzy:
    Pierzchała, Kazimierz
    Kulik, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151143.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    osoba
    skazany
    personalizm
    praca
    resocjalizacja
    socjalizacja
    wartość
    wychowanie
    zakład karny
    person
    convicted
    personalism
    work
    resocialization
    satisfaction
    socialization
    value
    upbringing
    prison
    Opis:
    Personalizm to nadanie zdarzeniu charakteru osobistego, skierowanego na wychowanie osoby, a resocjalizacja to przemiana tej osoby, skierowana w stronę wolności, pełnienia ról społecznych poprzez dążenie do autonomicznego i wolnego decydowania. Zamierzając zidentyfikować w personalistycznym obszarze istotę pracy ludzkiej istnieje potrzeba zwrócenia szczególnej uwagi na podmiot problemu, którym jest człowiek, jego człowieczeństwo, sposób na pojmowanie rzeczywistości i całego świata. Istota pracy powinna posiadać „ludzkie oblicze”, praca powinna być dla skazanych satysfakcjonującą. Zasadniczym celem badań było poznanie możliwości zastosowania pracy w procesie resocjalizacyjnym skazanych kobiet, ukazując personalistyczny wymiar wpływu tej pracy na resocjalizację.
    Personalism is giving the event a personal character, directed at the upbringing of a person, and resocialization is a transformation of that person, directed towards freedom, performing social roles, by striving for autonomous and free decision-making. In order to identify the essence of human work in a personalistic area, there is a need to pay special attention to the subject of the problem, which is man, his humanity, a way of understanding reality and the whole world. The essence of work should have a “human face”, work should be satisfying for convicts. The main goal of the research is to learn about the possibility of using work in the social rehabilitation process of convicted women, learning the personalistic dimension of the impact of this work on social rehabilitation.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Pedagogiczne; 2022, 14, 3; 61-86
    2080-850X
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Pedagogiczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies