Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "valuing" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Wychowanie do wartościowania w kontekście pluralizmu
Formation to Valuing in the Context of Pluralism
Autorzy:
Nowak, Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1857602.pdf
Data publikacji:
2001
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
proces wychowania
wartościowanie
pluralizm
cel wychowania
process of formation
valuing
pluralism
purpose (goal) of education
Opis:
The reflection on the theme of formation to valuing in the context of pluralism entails several important areas of analysis. First of all, the social and cultural dimension of the process of formation has been stressed. This implies both a necessity to properly choose values in formation and to take into account social consequences of the strategies how to teach them. The concepts of formation and values have been explained here, and particular principles according to which select values in the process of formation have been described. The formative situation under the conditions of the pluralism of values has been characterized in particular detail, including requirements and approved valuing attitudes in this context. A complex context of pluralism calls for adequate strategies of formation to valuing, among which we find: strategy of dissonance, strategy of testimony and strategy of stimulation. The strategies under consideration are directed towards a desirable formative effect, such as: greater sensitivity of the disciple to values, a coherent order of the selected values, coherence between the selected system of values and the realized attitude.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2001, 2; 5-27
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Postawy wartościujące w języku i tekście studenckim
Valuing Attitudes in Students Vocabulary and Text
Autorzy:
Zarębina, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2127809.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
wypowiedzi studenckie
ciąg synonimiczny
postawa wartościująca
nazwy osób
student's parlance
synonymic series
valuing attitude
names of persons
Opis:
The author depicts valuing attitudes in student's vocabulary on the basis of texts from four Krakow universities at the end of the twentieth century. The paper is limited mainly to the vocabulary from the semantic field kobieta (woman), mężczyzna (man). This vocabulary occurs in synonymous series: neutral words // words with a positive or negative connotation, e.g. osoba (person), kobieta (woman), dziewczyna (girl) // babka (chick), kumpela (mate), laska (chick), ważniara (panjandrum), artycha (skirt) or człowiek (man), mężczyzna (man), chłopiec (boy) // studencik, gościu (fellow, guy, bloke), facecik (fellow, guy), przystojniak, palant. In comparison with the vocabulary earlier by 30-40 years contained in the Vocabulary of Student's Dialect, there are twenty or so new words describing women and men, e.g. pankówa (punk girl), przeaparatka; boyfriend, przewir.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2002, 49-50, 6; 445-454
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wartościujący wymiar kategorii racjonalności nauki
The Valuing Dimension of the Category of the Rationality of Science
Autorzy:
Walczak, Monika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015625.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
racjonalność nauki
wypowiedzi wartościujące
ocena
opis
filozofia nauki
epistemologia
aksjologia
rationality of science
valuing statements
evaluation
description
philosophy of science
epistemology
axiology
Opis:
The paper is an attempt to reflect on the valuing dimension of the category of the rationality of science, ontological and epistemological problems. Such problems should be solved should rationality be deemed a valuing category. Taking into consideration the discussions on the valuing character of the categories in ethics (good, evil) and the significance of moral judgements as the point of departure, I am posing a question about the importance of expressions with regard to the rationality of science, expressions treated as valuing expressions. Since the beginning of the reflections on science until now it has contained valuing and normative elements. This was irrespective of whether it took the form of logic, epistemology, methodology or philosophy of science. Moreover, the above disciplines were treated as, of their nature, formulating the ideal of knowledge and providing rules of a valuing cognition. In the twentieth century the central concept on which the discussions focused was the category of rationality. The question was how to define a valuable scientific knowledge and how to pursue science. We find some problems when we want to interpret the category of rationality as a valuing category. These problems seem to be good examples of questions that should be answered, while interpreting other epistemic categories as valuing. Including the category of the rationality of science in the valuing categories is tantamount to the conferral of a valuing sense on the statements about the rationality of science, the predicator „rational” and its antonyms. The standpoints in question, the interpretations of valuing statements are as follows: anti-naturalism, naturalism, cognitivism, and acognitivism. They answer such questions as: 1) what kind of feature is rationality? 2) what are its relationships with other features, in particular with the features examined by the natural, or broadly, empirical sciences? 3) does the feature of being rational or the relationship of being a good reason on behalf of something really exist? 4) what kind of predicator of the predicator „rational” and its antonyms? 5) what are their relations to other predicators, in particular those predicators which the natural, or broadly, empirical sciences make use of? 6) what kind of propositions are the statements about the rationality of science? 7) what do the statements about the rationality of science denote, or do they denote anything really existing? 8) what are the relationships of the statements of the rationality of science to other statements, in particular the statements formulated by natural sciences, e.g. cognitive psychology? The review of various manners by which to use the category of rationality in the philosophy of science speaks on behalf of the rejection of extreme interpretations: both extremely cognitivist and acognitivist. In the statements about rationality there are now two components: descriptive (object-related) and valuing. The valuing component may be understood in at least three inseparable and often coexisting manners: approving/disapproving, perfectionist and normative.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2004, 52, 2; 347-364
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies