Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Convergent" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Specificity of dysfunctional beliefs in personality disorders: Psychometric characteristics of the Polish translation and modified version of the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ)
Autorzy:
Zawadzki, Bogdan
Popiel, Agnieszka
Pragłowska, Ewa
Newman, Cory
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2127594.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-04-08
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
core beliefs
Personality Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ)
personality disorders
diagnosis
convergent and discriminant validity
Opis:
The present analyses focused on the adaptation of the Personality Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ) – a tool measuring beliefs specific to personality disorders. Two Polish versions of the PBQ were developed: a translation of the original version consisting of 126 items, and a modified version comprised of 124 items (the scale for borderline personality was made diagnostically independent; the scale for schizotypal personality was added, and the items were assigned to the scales not only on the basis of their content but also on the basis of factor analysis results). For both versions, indicators of measurement reliability and validity were obtained based on results from more than 1,600 subjects. The data showed that the scales of both versions demonstrated acceptable reliability in terms of both internal consistency and temporal stability. The values of convergent validity of the scales in both versions were comparable (correlations with scales of the SCID-II questionnaire for Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II and TALEIA-400A: Test for AxiaL Evaluation and Interview for Clinical, Personnel, and Guidance Applications, assessing personality disorders), but scales of the modified PBQ version showed better discriminant validity (its internal structure also was very clearly confirmed by the results of confirmatory factor analysis). Insufficiently high convergent validity was found for both PBQ versions, including high intercorrelations among scales. Therefore, the discussion emphasized that although the PBQ allows for the identification of specific beliefs in personality disorders, it is not a diagnostic equivalent for tools assessing disorders per se.
Źródło:
Roczniki Psychologiczne; 2017, 20, 2; 355-372
1507-7888
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O niektórych problemach naturalizacji filozofii nauki na przykładzie sporu o realizm
On Some Problems of Naturalizing the Philosophy of Science Exemplified on the Controversy about Realism
Autorzy:
Zeider, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012841.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
naturalizm metodologiczny
filozoficzna interpretacja faktów naukowych
spór realizm-antyrealizm
rozumowanie abdukcyjne
sukces nauki
konwergentny realizm
Naturalna Postawa Ontologiczna
methodological naturalism
philosophical interpretation of scientific facts
realism-antirealism controversy
abductive reasoning
success of science
convergent realism
Natural Ontological Attitude
Opis:
The main purpose of the paper is analysis of some problems referred to methodological understanding of the process to naturalize philosophy of science. This process can be considered as justification of philosophical thesis by scientific facts, and also as application of the methods of justification, which are effective in natural sciences, to philosophy of science. These procedures are often called philosophical interpretation of scientific facts, and their methodological validity is taken under consideration. This problem is analysed on the two examples, which are related to realism-antirealism controversy. One of them is the final argument for scientific realism. The second is the Arthur Fine’s Natural Ontological Attitudes.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2011, 59, 2; 345-366
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies