Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "scepticism" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
    Tytuł:
    Meaning Scepticism
    Autorzy:
    Szubka, Tadeusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1918907.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-10-27
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 1994, 42, 1; 240-243
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Very Short Introduction to Scepticism (rec.: Duncan Pritchard. Scepticism: A Very Short Introduction)
    Autorzy:
    Socrates, Francisco Angel P.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1791164.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-06-28
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2021, 69, 2; 352-358
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Trzy strategie dyskusji ze sceptycyzmem
    Three strategies of debate with scepticism
    Autorzy:
    Ziemińska, Renata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015956.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2002
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    epistemologia
    sceptycyzm
    filozofia współczesna
    epistemology
    scepticism
    contemporary philosophy
    Opis:
    In debate with scepticism three general strategies may be differentiated: (1) pointing to self-refutation of scepticism; (2) looking for certainty; and (3) modification of the concept of knowledge. The latter strategy has at least three versions: (a) knowledge does not require certainty, (b) knowledge is not broadened by way of deduction, and (c) knowledge does not require the knowledge of knowledge. The first strategy refutes global scepticism, but does not give an example of knowledge and is not efficient in the case of scepticism based on the hypothesis of the malicious scientist. Also the second strategy is only able to refute the typical thesis of global scepticism (knowledge does not exist). Scepticism based on the hypothesis of the malicious scientist is more efficiently refuted in the third strategy. However, separation of knowledge and certainty is only avoiding the problem of scepticism. It is also doubtful if the principle of broadening knowledge by way of deduction may be refuted. Negation of the principle of transparency of knowledge is the most convincing one. After it is refuted, knowledge is possible in the situation when we do not know if we know and we cannot exclude sceptical hypotheses.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2002, 50, 1; 575-595
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zagadnienie sceptycyzmu w kontekście wpływu myśli Locke’a na filozofię Berkeleya
    Scepticism and the Influence of the Lockean Thought on Berkeley’s Philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Szałek, Piotr K.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2012927.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2010
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    J. Locke
    G. Berkeley
    istnienie
    materia
    korpuskularyzm
    sceptycyzm
    percepcja
    existence
    matter
    corpuscularism
    scepticism
    perception
    Opis:
    The paper seeks to answer the question about the actual influence of the Lockean thought on Berkeley’s philosophy. It promotes the view that though scepticism that arises from the representational theory of perception is an important factor for motivating Berkeley to built his anti-sceptical strategy, it is the so-called corpuscular scepticism that was in fact an essential element of this influence. The latter was a consequence of assuming the notion of corpuscular, yet unknown material substance by Locke, and motivated Berkeley to consider an argument for rejection of the existence of such substance. The Berkeleian anti-sceptical argument here seems congenial to the Cartesian origins of his definition of existence, and enables us to combine the Lockean perspective with the Cartesian reading of sources of Berkeley’s philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2010, 58, 1; 229-246
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Praktyczny sceptycyzm
    Practical Scepticism (the quotation of Gary Malinas paper)
    Autorzy:
    Malinas, Gary
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015803.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2003
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    wolne działanie
    odpowiedzialność
    usprawiedliwienie
    presupozycja
    free agency
    responsibility
    excuses
    presupposition
    Opis:
    In Section 2 of his paper (which follows the introductory section) Gary Malinas „summarises three arguments that have been advanced in recent discussions of free agency and responsibility. The first concludes that free agency and responsibility are incompatible with determinism. The second concludes that free agency and responsibility are incompatible with indeterminism. The third concludes that the concept of a free and responsible agent is incoherent. Taken collectively, they entail the conclusion of the practical sceptic: No one acts freely and responsibly. If the summary case can be filled out so that it is sound, it undercuts a number of the commitments of the thick conception of persons the fulfilment of which, arguably, is required for free and responsible action. I believe that the summary case can be filled out so that it is sound. I will adopt this belief as an unargued assumption. It entails that no one acts freely and is truly responsible for their actions. I also believe that it is true that people act freely and responsibly. Once the case for practical scepticism has been put, I devote the remainder of this paper to the vindication of this latter belief. My claim is that practical scepticism is sound, yet nevertheless, it is also true that people act freely and responsibly. The onus of the vindication will be to disarm what appears to be an explicit contradiction. Section 3 proposes a definition of free and responsible action in terms of the concept of exculpation. It argues that judgements concerning agents' responsibility for their actions are often true under the presuppositions which are in place in the settings in which the judgements are made. Those presuppositions restrict the domains over which the judgements are semantically evaluated. The practical sceptic contests those presuppositions and thereby alters the domain of semantic evaluation. Under the influence of sceptical argumentation, possibilities of exculpation which had been properly ignored can no longer be ignored. Section 4 sketches an account of presupposing and when exculpatory possibilities are properly ignored. Section 5 considers the question of whether I have conceded too much to the practical sceptic”.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2003, 51, 2; 103-125
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O klasycznym pojęciu prawdy
    On the classical concept of truth
    Autorzy:
    Judycki, Stanisław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2016132.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2001
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    epistemologia
    logika
    prawda
    sceptycyzm
    antyrealizm
    pragmatyzm
    koherencjonizm
    epistemology
    logic
    truth
    scepticism
    anti-realism
    pragmatism
    coherentionism
    Opis:
    The article presents the state of contemporary debate on the three fundamental theories of truth: classical (correspondence), coherentionist and pragmatist ones. Also A. Tarski’s conception o f truth, D. Davidson’s views on truth and the so-called deflationist conceptions are discussed. The author tries to show what relations occur between the pre-theoretical understanding o f the concept of truth and the classical concept of truth. Also the relation between the nature of truth and philosophical scepticism is discussed as well as the question: do sciences and technologies based on them need the classical concept of truth in order to account for the explanatory, prognostic and technological success they achieve. The article also discusses the position of the so-called anti-realism postulating replacing the concept of truth with e.g. the concept of ideal verification or the concept of objectivity. The opposition is considered between fundationalism and coherentionism and in this context the author tries to formulate an answer to the question of what the debate on the criterion of truth is concerned with. The conclusions drawn from all these considerations are the following. Despite the various attempts at discrediting or rejecting it the classical concept of truth is in a good theoretical condition. All sceptical positions have to assume this concept in one or another way; also no semantic programmes presented up to now (A. Tarski, D. Davidson) have been able to eliminate the classical concept of truth. Science and technology assume both the concept of truth in the classical sense and the characteristics that are connected with it. The classical understanding o f truth should be then recognised as one that cannot be eliminated from our conceptual paradigm we use to think about the world. The article is concluded with considerations on the metaphysical background of the classical concept of truth. The author formulates the thesis that there is a close relationship between the classical conception of truth and the position taken by metaphysical rationalism. In this context R. Descartes', G. W. Leibniz’s and I. Kant’s vies are discussed.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2001, 49, 1; 25-62
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kierkegaard On Descartes: Doubt as a Prefiguration of Existential Despair
    Kierkegaard o Kartezjuszu. Wątpienie jako prefiguracja egzystencjalnej rozpaczy
    Autorzy:
    Kupś, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2097302.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-06-30
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    Søren Kierkegaard
    Kartezjusz
    wątpienie
    rozpacz
    racjonalizm
    sceptycyzm
    nieskończona rezygnacja
    Descartes
    doubt
    despair
    rationalism
    scepticism
    infinite resignation
    Opis:
    In his early, unfinished essay entitled Johannes Climacus, or De omnibus dubitandum est, Søren Kierkegaard enters into a polemic with Hegel’s interpretation of the methodic Cartesian doubt. Kierkegaard questions the philosophical absolutism of Cartesian scepticism and his methodological universalism. For the first time in Kierkegaard’s writings, the sphere of speculation (thinking) is confronted with personal involvement (will). Kierkegaard never published this work (it came out posthumously), and did not make any direct reference to Descartes in the same form ever again. However, certain subjects and themes remained: doubt (contrasted with despair) and the alias (Johannes Climacus), used when writing that early essay.
    We swoim wczesnym, nieukończonym eseju zatytułowanym Johannes Climacus albo De omnibus dubitandum est Søren Kierkegaard wdaje się w polemikę z Heglowską interpretacją metodycznego Kartezjańskiego wątpienia. Kierkegaard kwestionuje filozoficzny absolutyzm Kartezjańskiego sceptycyzmu i jego metodologiczny uniwersalizm. Po raz pierwszy w pismach Kierkegaarda sfera spekulacji (myślenia) zostaje skonfrontowana z osobistym zaangażowaniem (wolą). Kierkegaard nigdy nie opublikował tego dzieła (wydano je pośmiertnie) i nigdy więcej nie odniósł się bezpośrednio do Kartezjusza w tej samej formie. Pozostały jednak pewne tematy i wątki: zwątpienie (przeciwstawione rozpaczy) i pseudonim (Johannes Climacus) używany podczas pisania tego wczesnego eseju.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2022, 70, 2; 23-34
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Charlesa S. Peirce’a krytyka epistemologii kartezjańskiej. U źródeł filozofii współczesnej
    Charles S. Peirce’s Critique of Cartesian Epistemology. At the Origins of Contemporary Philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Gutowski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015645.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2004
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    Kartezjusz
    Ch. S. Peirce
    epistemologia
    sceptycyzm
    wiedza
    nauka
    fallibilizm
    Descartes
    epistemology
    scepticism
    knowledge
    science
    fallibilism
    Opis:
    The paper presents Ch. S. Peirce's attack on Cartesian epistemology as it was formulated in 1868 article Some Consequences of Four Incapacities. Peirce's arguments are analyzed in the context of possible Descartes' responses. One conclusion of the paper is that Peirce uses two different notions of knowledge and science, and that the distance of his ideas from that of Descartes depends, among others, on which notion we take into account. Another conclusion is that although Peirce's general project of combining falibilism and anti-scepticism looks very attractive (especially in the light of what we now know about the development of science) it generates many problems that Descartes could have pointed out if he had a chance to talk to his two and a half century younger debater. Despite, however, the problems Peircean project generates, it may be regarerd as a forerunner of typical tendencies of 20th century philosophy such as e.g. fallibilism or antifoundationalism.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2004, 52, 2; 171-188
    0035-7685
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Filozoficzne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies