Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę ""Kłobukowski"" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Czy w czasach „posthumanistyki” można uprawiać antropologię literatury?
Can anthropology of literature be practiced in the times of “post-humanities”?
Autorzy:
Kłobukowski, Miłosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16729456.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-05-05
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Cyprian Kamil Norwid
Adam Mickiewicz
antropologia literatury
komparatystyka
humanistyka
romantyzm
Kazimierz Świegocki
Bolesław Leśmian
podmiotowość
C. K. Norwid
A. Mickiewicz
subjectivity
humanities
Romanticism
B. Leśmian
anthropology of literature
Opis:
The author analyzes Kazimierz Świegocki's book with respect to the most important changes in modern humanities – especially to the anthropological turn, that is the literary scholars' interest in the methods of cultural as well as comparative studies. Kłobukowski interprets Świegocki's comparative study on two planes – as an intriguing and sometimes innovative study of great Polish poets who participated in creating the literary tradition of the 19th and 20th centuries, and also as an attempt at building anthropology of literature using modern methods, but also deeply rooted in the philological tradition – based on the concept of subjectivity, whose vision may be reconstructed on the basis of the literary text. The reviewer thinks that the construction of the argument based on juxtaposing two different types of poetical anthropology that may be recognized in Mickiewicz's and Norwid's work is one of Świegocki's most interesting ideas. Świegocki's proposition seems advisable both to those who study Romanticism, and to theoreticians of literature. A vigorous and elegant style of the book makes it also recommendable to students, or even to people who are not “professionally” connected with literature.
Źródło:
Studia Norwidiana; 2012, 30; 254-267
0860-0562
Pojawia się w:
Studia Norwidiana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Norwidowska reinterpretacja mitu prometejskiego
Norwid’s reinterpretation of the Promethean myth
Autorzy:
Kłobukowski, Miłosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16729575.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-05-07
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Prometeusz
mit
ofiara
praca
język
interpretacja
mit „adamicki”
mit upadku
mit wygnania
Hezjod
Ajschylos
Norwid
Paul Ricoeur
René Girard
Promethidion
Rzecz o wolności słowa
Prometheus
myth
sacrifice
work
language
interpretation
“Adam’s myth” of the fall
myth of exile
Hesiod
Aeschylus
On Freedom of Speech
Opis:
The author’s aim is to reflect on one of the rudimentary myths constituting the European identity, that is the Promethean myth, and on its interpretation present in Norwid’s works. Kłobukowski states that the author of Promethidion interprets the story of the good Titan in a way that is different from that in which most poets of the 19th century Europe interpreted it, that is by referring to ancient sources of the myth in works by Hesiod, and not by Aeschylus; and that this interpretation has a character of a manifesto. At the same time Norwid, interpreting the story of Prometheus, enters a polemic with Western Romantics as well as with Mickiewicz and the poetic anthropology present in the main current of Romanticism, that was first of all based on such features as rebellion, autonomy of an individual, self-determination, or self-deification. The poet suggests a different vision of human subjectivity; he Christianizes the myth, at the same time doing the work of a comparatist and an anthropologist – comparing the figure of the Titan and the Biblical Adam (Promethidion), suggesting that it is not rebellion, but work is man’s true vocation. Norwid also interprets the phenomenon of the language and its history in the context of the Promethean myth, which he perceives as a myth of the fall (On Freedom of Speech). Kłobukowski also analyzes one of the most important mythemes from the story of Prometheus – that of sacrifice, that, according to Western Romantics, was connected with creating an individualist “I”. Norwid interprets the meaning of sacrifice in a different way – namely, as a phenomenon showing the fullness of humanity and acceptance of the imperfection of the human condition.
Źródło:
Studia Norwidiana; 2015, 33; 77-108
0860-0562
Pojawia się w:
Studia Norwidiana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies