Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "the Marshal of the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12
    Tytuł:
    Dopuszczalność dokonania przez Marszałka Sejmu ponownej oceny formalnej petycji w sytuacji, gdy wicemarszałek Sejmu upoważniony do wykonywania zadań Marszałka związanych z petycjami odmówił przekazania jej do rozpatrzenia
    Admissibility of conducting by the Marshal of the Sejm a formal re‑assessment of a petition in a situation when the Vice-Marshal of the Sejm authorized to perform the tasks of the Marshal related to petitions refused to submit it for consideration
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2193753.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    petition
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Vice-Marshal of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The Vice-Marshal of the Sejm, who has been authorized by the Marshal of the Sejm to take action in matters related to petitions, does not exercise the competence to assess petitions on his own, but does so on behalf of the Marshal. This action should therefore be assessed, as if it were performed personally by the Marshal of the Sejm. The provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm do not provide for the possibility of re-assessment of petitions. Consequently, the petitioner’s request to re-examine the petition in order to possibly amend the decision to leave it unexamined cannot be satisfied.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 1(73); 75-80
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 10a ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu
    Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Kubuj, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223414.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Marshal of the Sejm
    sitting of the Sejm
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The author provides an analysis of the provisions of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the context of the time period within which it should consider a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm. She points out that the opportunity to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is complicated as compared to the election procedure,. The character of the time limit for consideration of the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is not indicative, but mandatory. From an analysis of the concept of ‘the next sitting of the Sejm, it follows that the consideration of the motion and the putting thereof to a vote at the sitting that is “the first one after 7 days of its submission”.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 71-74
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko
    Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223415.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Deputy
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 75-82
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
    Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Sejm committee
    Marshal of the Sejm
    petition
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Tryb rozpatrywania przedłożonego przez Radę Języka Polskiego „Sprawozdania o stanie ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017”
    Procedure for considering the “Report on the state of protection of the Polish language in 2016–2017” submitted by the Polish Language Council
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215979.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Polish language
    Sejm committee
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The report, submitted by the Council for the Polish Language, entitled “Language of political information”, contains an analysis of the problem that is narrow in scope. In the light of the current parliamentary practice, the narrow scope of the Council’s reports is typical and this has not been questioned in the course of parliamentary work. The decision of the Culture and Media Committee, resulting in a refusal to consider the document in question, is an expression of negation of the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to recognize this document as a report. Formally, the committee proceedings on the report had not been completed. The Committee should return to examining this document and complete its work, formulating an appropriate opinion.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 69-75
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 175 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
    Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 175 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the specific questions
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6583387.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm
    Deputy
    sitting of the Sejm
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The opinion concerns the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to expel a Deputy from a sitting, taken pursuant to Article. 175 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, such decision is not final, as the Presidium of the Sejm may quash it, having considered an appeal submitted by the Deputy and – on the other hand – is immediately applicable, because the expelled Deputy is obliged to leave the Chamber and abstain from participating in further deliberations until his/her appeal is considered (or until the end of the session of the Sejm, if the Deputy has not submitted an appeal). Therefore, the expelled member does not have the right to participate in voting. Preventing the Deputy expelled from the sitting from “entering the Chamber with the purpose of voting” is necessary in order to respect Article 176 para. 6 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 206-210
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat podstaw prawnych umieszczania flagi Unii Europejskiej na terenie Sejmu
    Legal opinion on the legal basis for displaying of the European Union flag in the precincts of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Czarny, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12292948.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    flag
    European Union
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Opis:
    According to the author, in the Polish legal system there is no regulation concerning the flag protocol. Therefore, the rules of diplomatic protocol as well as heraldry and vexillology customs are applied which allow for flying, apart from the national flag, also other symbols of states or international organizations. The author claims that, due to lack of provisions governing competence to determine which authority is an appropriate body for adopting flag protocols for particular public administration buildings, this should be the power of the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm, who – according to the Standing Orders of the Sejm – ensures order and decorum within the precincts of the Chamber.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 252-260
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni niektórych przepisów ustawy o wykonywaniu inicjatywy ustawodawczej przez obywateli
    Legal opinion on interpretation of certain provisions of the Act on Exercise of the Legislative Initiative by Citizens
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16539487.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    legislative initiative
    bill
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The Marshal of the Sejm is not allowed to verify, whether an explanatory statement to a bill submitted by a group of citizens meets requirements specified in Articles 34 paras. 2 and 3 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. Besides, demanding enclosure – to the notification of the establishment of the Committee – of statements on accession to the legislative initiative committee and of a statement on selection of committee’s agent, is not based on rules of the Act of 24th June 1999 on Exercise of the Legislative Initiative by Citizens. Therefore the current practice of demanding the enclosure of the above documents cannot be continued in future.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 1(33); 65-75
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Podjęcie przez Marszałka Sejmu interwencji w ramach realizacji funkcji kontrolnych Sejmu
    Intervention by the Marshal of the Sejm within the framework of the implementation of the control functions of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Gierach, Ewelina
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215810.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    parliamentary oversight
    Marshal of the Sejm
    state prosecution
    Opis:
    In the light of the binding provisions of law, the General Prosecutor is included in the subject matter of the oversight function of the Sejm. The statutory request for information and explanations may been perceived as the main instrument of parliamentary oversight serving to obtain information on specific proceedings conducted by the state prosecution.. The Marshal of the Sejm may refer a matter to the Committee on Justice and Human Rights, since the subject matter of activity of this committee includes matters related to the activities of the state prosecution, in order to obtain relevant information and express an opinion.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 55-60
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją przepisów ustawy – Kodeks wyborczy
    Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of the provisions of the Act – Electoral Code
    Autorzy:
    Esmund, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216079.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Electoral Code
    Constitutional Tribunal
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The position of the Sejm refers to application of the Marshal of the Sejm initiating proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal. The position of the Sejm it was stated that the questioned provision of the Act – Electoral Code, in so far as it limits the competence of the Marshal of the Sejm to change the date of presidential elections after an occurrence of unpredictable, extraordinary circumstances hindering or preventing the holding of elections on the originally scheduled date, is unconstitutional. According to the applicant, the challenged provision violates the Constitution because it introduces additional, non-constitutional deadlines binding the Marshal of the Sejm in ordering elections to the office of the President of the Republic of Poland. It also excludes the constitutional competence of the Marshal of the Sejm to change the date of these elections and limits the possibility of ordering presidential elections by indicating a statutory holiday.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 277-290
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie odwoływania członków Rady Ochrony Pracy
    Legal opinion on the dismissal of members of the Labour Protection Council
    Autorzy:
    Czarny, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216599.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    term of office
    Marshal of the Sejm
    Labour Protection Council
    Opis:
    The author argues that laconic regulation of the dismissal of members of the Labour Protection Council, in conjunction with the provisions specifying its composition and with the principle of personal discontinuation of parliament’s work, allows us to assume that the end of the term of the Sejm and the Senate may constitute a precondition for dismissal from membership of the Board of Deputies and Senators sitting in the chambers of previous term of office and for the appointment of their successors from among the members of parliament of a new term. The principle of rotation in the terms of office of the Labour Protection Council means that the Marshal of the Sejm may not dismiss its members at his/her own “discretion”. Because of such a flawed and unclear provisions of the Act on the National Labour Inspectorate, the existing law should, according to the author, be changed and supplemented.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 2(50); 199-208
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie kompetencji Marszałka Sejmu dotyczących realizacji uprawnień poselskich wynikających z art. 19 ustawy o wykonywaniu mandatu posła i senatora
    Legal opinion on the competence of the Marshal of the Sejm concerning the exercise by the Deputies’ of their right under Article 19 of the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a D eputy or Senator
    Autorzy:
    Szmyt, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543077.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Polska
    access to public information and Marshal of the Sejm
    MEP
    Opis:
    The opinion states that the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm is not competent to resolve disputes concerning the consequences of a refusal to provide information to a deputy by a company, pursuant to Article 19 of the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a Deputy or Senator. The opinion stated that in order to “defend their good name” the Deputies concerned may benefit from legal instruments to which all citizens are entitled. Measures applied against the Deputies do not violate the dignity of the Sejm and do not imply the need to defend their good name by the Marshal of the Sejm.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 3(43); 181-184
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-12 z 12

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies