Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Intelligent Design" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Gilson, Darwin, and Intelligent Design
Autorzy:
FitzGerald, Desmond J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507488.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-12-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Gilson
Aristotle
Spencer
Darwin
Darwinism
evolution
intelligent design
teleology
Opis:
The article starts with stating the fact that today there is an increasing recognition of difficulties with Darwinism accompanied by vigorous responses on the part of Darwin’s defenders; among the instances of challenge to the dominant theory, one can find a book of Gilson, From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again, and those behind the Intelligent Design movement. In relating the book of Gilson to the ID proponents, the author concludes that, while in some ways they are on the same side in opposing the anti-creation thrust of Darwinism, Gilson is neutral on the validity or truth of Darwin’s biological hypothesis. Gilson, however, whose book preceded the ID movement by some twenty years, seeks to analyze Darwinism from the perspective of the classical philosophy of nature. He well understands that, according to modern scientific method, final causes are excluded from consideration, but he calls for a biophilosophy which will be open to the reality of human experience as Aristotle was and recognize that teleology is present in nature. According to him, even if teleology seems to be a contestable explanation, chance as understood by Darwinists is the pure absence of explanation.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 349-361
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung?
Intelligent Design—Fundamentalism or Uncomfortable Challenge?
Autorzy:
Wald, Berthold
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507316.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
evolution
creation
reason
design
random variation
natural selection
irreducible complexity
Christian idea of man
Neo-Darwinism
creationism
Intelligent Design
Opis:
Order and change in nature have been for a long time understood in philosophy and theology as founded in divine reason. In the neo-Darwinist theory of evolution, their explanation is reduced to material change without reason. Molecular biologists like M. Behe and W. Demski argue that any reductionist explanation of living beings must be wrong. The evolution of irreducible complex structures is impossible on the basis of random variation and natural selection alone, and must be the result of intelligent design. The article argues that ID-theory, unlike Biblical Creationism, is a challenge for neo-Darwinism and for modern theology as well—for, unlike the Roman magisterium, many Catholic theologians try to harmonize reductive explanation with the notion of creation.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2017, 6, 2; 287-321
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metaphysics and Evolution: Response to Critics
Autorzy:
Polis, Dennis
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2057089.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Aristotelianism
Thomism
evolution
substance-accident distinction
epistemology
projective realism
nominalism
relativism
intentional existence
laws of nature
species problem
intelligent design
problem of universals
exemplar ideas
creationism
moderate realism
teleology
abstraction
Opis:
I respond to Michał Chaberek’s and Robert A. Delfino’s criticisms of my argument that evolution is compatible with Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics. Biological species, as secondary substances, are beings of reason founded in the natures of their instances. They are traceable to God’s creative intent, but not to universal exemplars. Aquinas teaches that concepts are derived from sensible accidents. Thus, evolution’s directed variation of such accidents will eventually require new species concepts. This accords with projective realism, which allows diverse, well-founded concepts based on the mul-tiple perspectives and conceptual spaces of knowing subjects. Charges that this is nom-inalism, not moderate realism, are rebutted; however, it is relativism because knowledge is a subject-object relation. Other metaphysical issues are considered. Chaberek’s thesis that species cannot evolve naturally fails because he: (1) reifies the species con-cept, (2) misrepresents the motivation, structure and conclusions of evolution, (3) con-fuses Aristotle’s four causes and (4) limits God’s creative omnipotence. Finally, Cha-berek is out of step with contemporary theology.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2021, 10, 4; 847-891
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies