Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Krąpiec Mieczysław A." wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11
    Tytuł:
    Man in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Autorzy:
    Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507460.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-12-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    man
    soul
    body
    creation
    death
    resurrection
    person
    decision
    nature
    second nature
    action
    morality
    fulfillment
    Aristotle
    Thomas Aquinas
    Jesus Christ
    Christian philosophy
    Christian anthropology
    Thomistic personalism
    Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Opis:
    The author attempts to first review the most general and culturally important statements on the subject of man, and then present the developed and rationally justified conception of man as a personal being who, by his action, transcends nature, society, and himself. This conception, unique in world literature, finds its expression in St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae, which presents a justifying context for man’s origin and life, ontic structure, individual and social actions, and his eschatic fulfillment by the intervention of the Incarnate God—Jesus Christ. In his Summa, Aquinas not only considers and rationally justifies all the basic aspects of the nature of man who transcends the world by his conscious and free action, but also takes into consideration various anthropological theories developed in ancient Greece and Rome.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2018, 7, 4; 597-664
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Lublin Philosophical School: Achievements, Identity and Prospects
    Autorzy:
    Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
    Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
    McDonald, Hugh
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507540.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-12-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Lublin Philosophical School
    metaphysics
    realism
    philosophy
    Krąpiec
    Kalinowski
    Swieżawski
    Wojtyła
    Opis:
    The article is concentrated on the Lublin Philosophical School which came into being in the institutional framework of the Department of Philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; it describes its achievements, which took place at different stages of the School’s development, as well as the School’s new initiatives and challenges. The development of the School was connected with the involvement of new people and successive generations of new students who joined in the cultivation of realistic philosophy. One can regard the years 1950–1966 as the first stage of the School’s development, in which the School’s program was formulated. The following stages are the years 1967–1980, and 1981–2004, and the years that follow, in which new generations of students who take up inquiries in the spirit of the School’s program arrive. The article also explains the reasons why today the Lublin Philosophical School cannot be identified with the Department of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin, but rather with a special style of cultivating philosophy.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 423-441
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec’s Metaphysics of Law
    Autorzy:
    Stępień, Katarzyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2057087.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-20
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    philosophy of law
    metaphysics of law
    natural law
    human rights
    common good
    sovereingty
    justice
    relations
    Opis:
    The subject of interest of the philosophy (metaphysics) of law developed by Mieczy-sław A. Krąpiec is the existence of natural law, the ways in which the content of this law is formulated, the basis of established law and justice, the relationship between es-tablished law and natural law, and the conditions of law’s implementation in various communities. Krąpiec proposed, firstly, a realistic interpretation of law as a real and in-terpersonal relation; secondly, a concept of the analogical natural law; and thirdly, the interpretation of human rights as ways of realizing the personal nature of the human be-ing—as the ways which are found in the social context and proclaimed particularly in the form of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Concerning the philo-sophy of politics, Krąpiec considered the issue of the sovereignty of the human person in relation to sovereignty of society, nation, and the State, as well as the issue of politics understood as the realization of the common good in a prudent manner. Krąpiec also referred to the Polish tradition of defending the rights of nations, thus building the foun-dations of the philosophy of nation.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2021, 10, 4; 915-941
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Lublin Philosophical School: Founders, Motives, Characteristics
    Autorzy:
    Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
    Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
    McDonald, Hugh
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507314.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-12-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Lublin Philosophical School
    metaphysics
    realism
    philosophy
    Krąpiec
    Kalinowski
    Swieżawski
    Wojtyła
    Opis:
    The article is focused on the Lublin Philosophical School; it explains its name, presents its founders, reveals the causes of its rise, and introduce the specific character of the School’s philosophy. It starts with stating the fact that in the proper sense, the term “Lublin Philosophical School” describes a way of cultivating realistic (classical) philosophy developed in the 1950s by a group of philosophers at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland. The Lublin Philosophical School is characterized by cognitive realism (the object of cognition is really existing being), maximalism (taking up all existentially important questions), methodological autonomy (in relation to the natural-mathematical sciences and theology), transcendentalism in its assertions (its assertions refer to all reality), methodological-epistemological unity (the same method applied in objectively cultivated philosophical disciplines), coherence (which guarantees the objective unity of the object), and objectivity (achieved by the verifiability of assertions on their own terms, which is achieved by relating them in each instance to objective evidence). The term is the name of the Polish school of realistic (classical) philosophy that arose as a response to the Marxism that was imposed administratively on Polish institutions of learning, and also as a response to other philosophical currents dominant at the time such as phenomenology, existentialism, and logical positivism.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 4; 405-422
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Metaphysics in the Lublin Philosophical School
    Autorzy:
    Krąpiec, Mieczysław A.
    Maryniarczyk, Andrzej
    McDonald, Hugh
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507618.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-06-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Lublin Philosophical School
    metaphysics
    philosophy
    cognition
    object
    being
    method
    demonstration
    justification
    reason
    cause
    separation
    reality
    world
    Opis:
    The article is aimed at presenting the way in which metaphysics is understood and cultivated in the Lublin Philosophical School, Poland. It includes such topics as: the definition of metaphysics, metaphysical cognition (its object and the method for singling it out), ways of metaphysical demonstration and rational justification, and the relation of metaphysics to other domains of philosophy. In the light of the information delivered, it can be concluded that metaphysics in the Lublin Philosophical School is understood as a way of knowing in which the reason employs the universal laws of being and thought and strives to discover the first and singular factors or causes that render free of contradiction that which exists and which is given to us in a germinal way in the empirical intuition of the material world.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 2; 391-427
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    THE GOOD AS THE MOTIVE OF HUMAN ACTION ACCORDING TO MIECZYSŁAW ALBERT KRĄPIEC
    Autorzy:
    Kunat, Natalia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507302.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    metaphysics
    good
    action
    motive
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    Opis:
    In this article the authoress has presented the understanding of the good as the motive for human action on the basis of the position of M. A. Krąpiec. At the beginning, the authoress has concentrated on an analysis of the fact of action, which includes three major factors: the end, the exemplar, and the efficient cause. The good-end here performs the most essential function. The good-end is the motive due to which action has come into existence rather than not. That “which throws” man “out of passivity” to action is described as the motive that appears as the good. In the next part of the article, the good is presented as a fundamental transcendental property of being. The connection of being with the good shows that the world that surrounds us is a world of goods, that is, of beings ordered to the will of a maker or of the Creator. The transcendental good thus understood constitutes the foundation for all action. In the final part of the article, an analysis is made of the functions that are shown by the good that constitutes the motive for action. The first of these functions is the cognitive apprehension of the good understood in the context of the end—the motive of action. At the end, the domains of goods are listed, in which the ontic good, which is a transcendental property of being, plays the most important role.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 155-166
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Personalism in the Lublin School of Philosophy (Card. Karol Wojtyła, Fr. Mieczysław A. Krąpiec)
    Autorzy:
    Duma, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507334.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-06-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Lublin School of Philosophy
    Karol Wojtyła
    Mieczysław Krąpiec
    personalism
    philosophy
    metaphysics
    person
    man
    experience
    nature
    culture
    Opis:
    The article presents the conception of personalism and the understanding of human person developed by two Polish philosophers: Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, the framers and the main representatives of the Lublin School of Philosophy. The author comes to the following conclusions: (1) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of personalism comes from experience and seeks verification in experience; it does not accept any a priori explanations or theses, though it does not shy away from drawing upon different branches of knowledge in its attempts to broaden experience, being aware that not everything is given to immediate experiential perception; (2) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s personalism wants to draw on the whole philosophical tradition, taking into account, at the same time, the findings of different sciences of man or humanities which broaden the experience of man or contribute something to the interpretation of experience; (3) bringing together genetic empiricism and methodical rationalism, Wojtyła and Krąpiec are able to avoid radicalism in the explanation of man, making a successful attempt to join in a complementary way these aspects of personal human being which carry some opposition; (4) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of person does not bear any traces of antagonism since it is not directed against anyone; in the light of this conception every human person has a character of the honest good which is the unconditional good, that is the highest and the ultimate good not competing with the value of anything else; (5) Wojtyła and Krąpiec prove that the conception of human person lies at the basis of understanding society, culture, ethics, law, politics, economy, art, and even religion.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 2; 365-390
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    EXISTENTIAL DETERMINANTS OF THE LANGUAGE OF METAPHYSICS
    Autorzy:
    Kunat, Natalia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507276.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-06-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    language
    metaphysics
    realism
    existential judgement
    transcendentals
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    Stanisław Kamiński
    Opis:
    The article presents the existential determinants of the language of metaphysics primarily on the basis of the philosophical stances adopted by Stanisław Kamiński and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec. Realistic philosophy, which focuses principally on the problem of being, uses the language of metaphysics, which helps in understanding reality in itself. Moreover, the article analyses the structure of the language of metaphysics as well as the existential elements constituting its specificity, i.e., among other things, existential judgement and transcendentals.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2015, 4, 2; 117-130
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    TO KNOW OR TO THINK—THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE UNDERSTANDING OF PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE LIGHT OF THE STUDIES OF MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC
    Autorzy:
    Duma, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507566.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    thinking
    cognition
    philosophy
    knowledge
    reality
    abstract
    sign
    understanding
    metaphysics
    realism
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    Opis:
    The article concentrates on the specificity of philosophical cognition. Referring to Mieczysław A. Krąpiec’s study, the author proves that the process of thinking is not to be necessarily identified with the process of cognition, as in fact the former is merely a secondary phase of the latter. When identified with thinking, the philosophical cognition would undermine the very sense of cognition, which means the understanding of reality. When based on thinking alone, philosophy does not grasp real things, but operates with abstracts of being and being’s representations (concepts). As for the correctness of philosophical thinking the laws of logic, with ensuring non-contradictory operations, are sufficient enough. However, any knowledge that aspires to be philosophical has to start from really existing beings. In the next phases of cognition, such beings are grasped more and more particularly and precisely—starting from their transcendental properties and principles, then their structure and categorial properties, and finally their individual characteristics and actions. The very first act of cognition is directed to real beings, which are immediately grasped in respect of their existence and real essence. The second act of cognition deals with signs. The precedence of being in human cognition makes the philosophy charged not with a task of thinking about the world, but with the task of knowing and understanding it within possible and verifiable limits. Therefore, according to Krapiec, the very first philosophical discipline is metaphysics, which has real beings as its object. Thus, philosophical cognition should preserve its objective character, as this is the only way to guarantee its realism.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2014, 3; 277-299
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Structure of a Person as the Basis for Determining the Common Good as Understood by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    Autorzy:
    Ragan, Gabriel
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507340.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-06-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    man
    person
    common good
    intellectual knowledge
    will
    good
    love
    religion
    personal dignity
    ontic completeness
    legal subjectivity
    Opis:
    The author makes an attempt to analyze the anthropological views of Mieczysław A. Krąpiec in order to show the reasons why some elements of the structure of man as a person—resulting from the human mode of access to truth, goodness, beauty and religion—are essentially significant for determining the common good that lies at the foundation of all forms of human social life. He analyzes such parts of the human person’s structure as intellectual knowledge, will for the good, love, religion, personal dignity, ontic completeness and legal subjectivity.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 2; 305-317
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Krąpiec on the Specificity of Man
    Autorzy:
    Ugwuanyi, Faustinus I.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507584.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-03-20
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
    man
    human being
    human person
    specificity of man
    anthropology
    metaphysics
    animal rationale
    animal culturale
    animal sociale
    homo faber
    homo religiosus
    Opis:
    The author presents selected insights offered by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, O.P., about the specificity of man. He starts with making a methodological remark about the correlation between Krąpiec’s anthropology and metaphysics. Then, he tries to grasp essentials in Krąpiec’s interpretation of attributes traditionally indicated as defining man alone, namely animal rationale, animal culturale, animal sociale, homo faber, and homo religiosus. Finally, he concludes that, although all these attributes aptly describe the specificity of man, they all are reducible to the fact that man is a person.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 1; 169-180
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies