Temat: quality of treatment - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Guidelines of the Association of Polish Surgeons and the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology on the accreditation of healthcare centers providing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for primary and secondary peritoneal cancers
Autorzy:: Jastrzębski, Tomasz
Richter, Piotr
Zegarski, Wojciech
Dziki, Adam
Wallner, Grzegorz
Jeziorski, Arkadiusz
Wysocki, Wojciech
Jackowski, Marek
Bębenek, Marek
Olesiński, Tomasz
Polkowski, Wojciech
Wyrwicz, Lucjan
Wydra, Dariusz
Biernat, Wojciech
Czauderna, Piotr
Studniarek, Michał
Polec, Tomasz
Owczuk, Radosław
Sommer, Anna
Szewczyk, Krzysztof
Mielko, Jerzy
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1391728.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: accreditation
cytoreduction
HIPEC
peritoneal cancer
quality of treatment
Opis:: Surgical interventions in patients with peritoneal metastases combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and systemic treatment are becoming more common and, when applied to selected patient groups, they reach 5-year survival rates of 32–52%. Good clinical outcomes require experienced and well-equipped healthcare centers, experienced surgical team and adequate patient qualification process. As a result of the discussion on the need for evaluation of quality of care and treatment outcomes and at the request of the Peritoneal Cancer Section of the Polish Society of Surgical Oncology, accreditation standards have been developed and the Accreditation Committee has been established for healthcare centers providing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the management of primary and secondary peritoneal cancers.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2020, 92, 4; 47-53
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Evaluation of the quality of life of women treated due to breast cancer using amputation or breast conserving surgery in the early postoperative period
Autorzy:: Nowicki, Andrzej
Licznerska, Bernardeta
Rhone, Piotr
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1395600.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015-04-01
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: breast cancer
surgical treatment
quality of life
Opis:: Selection of the treatment method in breast cancer patients and its consequences may affect their quality of life through somatic, psychical, and social factors. The aim of the study was early evaluation of the quality of life of women after mastectomy vs. breast conserving surgery. Material and methods. The study included 100 women aged 31 to 79 years (mean: 57) who underwent surgery due to breast cancer (amputation: 52; breast conserving surgery: 48 women) at the Cancer Centre in Bydgoszcz in 2014. The QLQ C-30 and QLQ BR-23 questionnaires were used to evaluate the quality of life of the patients 3 months after surgery. Results. In the Global Health Status/QoL domain, the mean score for women after amputation and breast conserving surgery was 49 and 53, respectively; for Physical Functioning, the scores were 70 and 75, and for Role Functioning, 62 and 68, respectively. For Cognitive Functioning, the mean score was 74 and 73; for Emotional Functioning - 62 and 68, and for Social Functioning 64 and 60, respectively. The difference in the arm symptoms domain was significant at 46 and 33 points, respectively (p = 0.004). The patients treated with breast conserving surgery had a better body image than women after amputation - the mean score was 52 and 66, respectively (p = 0.01). Conclusions. With respect to Global Health Status/QoL and Physical Functioning, the quality of life of women in the early postoperative period was similar in women after breast amputation and those who underwent breast conserving surgery. Patients treated with breast conserving surgery had a better score for body image, while those who underwent amputation more often suffered from arm symptoms, such as pain, oedema, and problems with raising of the limb.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2015, 87, 4; 174-180
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: How do patients assess outcomes of treatment of prognathism?
Autorzy:: Neskoromna-Jędrzejczak, Aneta
Bogusiak, Katarzyna
Antoszewski, Bogusław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1394348.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015
Wydawca:: Index Copernicus International
Tematy:: prognathism
surgical treatment
results
subjective self-assessment
quality of life
Opis:: The aim of the study was to analyze the results of patients’ subjective self-assessment of surgical treatment of prognathism. Materials and methods. The study included 35 patients who underwent extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Each patient responded to 12 questions contained in the questionnaire created by the authors. Results. All respondents positively assessed their appearance after surgery. In most cases they pointed out the positive impact of treatment on their self-confidence (82.9% of responses). The vast majority of respondents felt improvement in biting off food (91.4%). Conclusions. Patients positively evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment with extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. The subjective improvement of the facial appearance, as well as chewing and articulation functions took place after the treatment.
Źródło:: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2015, 87, 8; 395-401
0032-373X
2299-2847
Pojawia się w:: Polish Journal of Surgery
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "quality of treatment" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język