- Tytuł:
- Better than a Rope of Sand: cohesion in commercial society
- Autorzy:
- Berry, Christopher J
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/420501.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2017
- Wydawca:
- Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
- Tematy:
-
self-interest
Commerce
Justice
Smith
Hume - Opis:
- RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Do Smith, Hume and other Scots have an argument to reject John Brown’s claim in his Estimate that a society based on self-interest lacks cohesion? And can they do so without accepting Hobbes’ argument that the necessary cohesion can only be provided by the threat of coercion from a sovereign? THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Problem: The eighteenth century debate on the nature of commercial society. Method: Analysis of key texts in the debate as it occurred in Scotland. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The Scots argue that a society where everyman lives by exchanging, operating on the assumption of selfinterest, is a more peaceable, more equitable and thus more cohesive than that envisioned by Brown. When reinforced by the rule of law, self-interested behaviour supports mutually supportive behaviour. Ultimately this embodies a constant and universal principle of human nature. Human behaviour is not random or chaotic and a commercial society not only exemplifies that fact but also sustains a form of societal life superior to any that has one before. RESEARCH RESULTS: Nostalgia for an earlier time is mis-placed. For all its vehemence Brown’s critique is mis-directed and thus unjustified. CONCLUSION, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This selection of the Scots should be widened to investigate whether Ferguson, Kames, Wallace among others have the same resources as Hume and Smith to rebut Brown.
- Źródło:
-
Horyzonty Polityki; 2017, 8, 25; 29-41
2082-5897 - Pojawia się w:
- Horyzonty Polityki
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł