Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Tribunal of" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie wymogów formalnych wstępnych wniosków o pociągnięcie do odpowiedzialności konstytucyjnej byłego Prezesa Rady Ministrów Jarosława Kaczyńskiego i byłego Ministra Sprawiedliwości i Prokuratora Generalnego Zbigniewa Ziobrę
Opinion concerning formal requirements of preliminary motions for constitutional accountability action before the Tribunal of State against former Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński and against former Minister of Justice and Public Prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro (Opinion prepared on December 11, 2012 on the request of the Bureau of Research of the Chancellery of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Steinborn, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543580.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
constitutional accountability
preliminary motion
Tribunal of State
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine whether the above mentioned preliminary motions for constitutional accountability action before the Tribunal of State are consistent with the requirements specified in the Act on the Tribunal of state and the Code of Penal Procedure. The author points out numerous formal defects of the motions, including the failure to indicate the place of commission of the act and failure to submit a list of persons that the applicants demand to be summoned before the Constitutional Accountability Committee.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 219-228
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wykorzystanie zapisu audialnego uzyskanego w postępowaniu karnym jako dowodu w postępowaniu w sprawie pociągnięcia do odpowiedzialności konstytucyjnej
The use of an audio recording obtained in criminal proceedings as evidence in proceeding concerning the incurring of constitutional accountability
Autorzy:
Barbara, Janusz-Pohl
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215824.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
constitutional accountability
criminal proceedings
Tribunal of State
Opis:
According to the author’s opinion, the Constitutional Accountability Committee is entitled to request written explanations or documents from public authorities, as well as the files of each case conducted by them. The Committee is therefore entitled to obtain an audio recording for evidentiary purposes. According to the author, it is also permissible for the Committee to carry out such evidence, if it is requested by a person who is the subject of a preliminary motion to hold the person accountable before the Tribunal of State. Transcriptions and other documents made on the basis of the recordings may also serve as evidence in proceedings pending before the Constitutional Accountability Committee.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 2(62); 165-183
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości pociągnięcia do odpowiedzialności przed Trybunałem Stanu wybranych podmiotów z powodu przyjęcia ustawy budżetowej, która przewiduje inny wymiar wydatków na określone cele, niż wynika to z przepisów innych ustaw
Legal opinion on the possibility of holding some entities accountable before the State Tribunal for the adoption of the Budget Act which provides the amount of expenditures for specific purposes other than resulting from the provisions of other statutes
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542789.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
State budget
constitutional accountability
Tribunal of State
Opis:
The author argues that the inconsistency between the Budget Act and other statutes can be eliminated by way of amendment of the Budget Act or amendment of the relevant implementing provisions. The accountability for adoption of the Budget Act cannot be assigned to any of the entities, unless in the course of work on the Bill constitutionally provided procedural requirements have been breached. The author points out that some participants in the legislative procedure cannot be held accountable before the Tribunal of State due to material incompatibility of parliamentary mandate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 67-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie spełnienia wymogów formalnych wstępnego wniosku o pociągnięcie do odpowiedzialności konstytucyjnej przed Trybunałem Stanu byłego Prezesa Rady Ministrów Jarosława Kaczyńskiego
Opinion concerning the fulfilment of formal requirements by a preliminary motion for constitutional accountability action before the Tribunal of State against former Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński (Opinion prepared on January 8, 2013 on the request of the Chief of the Chancellery of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Sakowicz, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543567.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
constitutional accountability
preliminary motion
Tribunal of
State
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine whether the preliminary motion for constitutional accountability action against former Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński for violation of Polish Constitution and the Penal Code meets the formal requirements for such motions. The author points out numerous formal defects of the preliminary motion and opts for their immediate elimination. Nevertheless, in his view, the existing deficiencies do not disparage the motion, as they may be corrected later.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 199-209
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie spełnienia wymogów formalnych wstępnego wniosku o pociągnięcie do odpowiedzialności konstytucyjnej przed Trybunałem Stanu byłego Ministra Sprawiedliwości i Prokuratora Generalnego Zbigniewa Ziobry
Opinion concerning the fulfilment of formal requirements by a preliminary mo‑ tion for constitutional accountability action before the Tribunal of State against former Minister of Justice and Public Prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro (Opin‑ ion prepared on January 8, 2013 on the request of the Chief of the Chancellery of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Sakowicz, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543576.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
constitutional accountability
preliminary motion
Tribunal of State
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine whether the preliminary motion for constitutional accountability action against former Minister of Justice and Public Prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro for violation of Polish Constitution and the Penal Code meets the formal requirements for such motions. The author points out numerous formal defects of the preliminary motion and opts for their immediate elimination. Nevertheless, in his view, the existing deficiencies do not disparage the motion, as they may be corrected later.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 210-218
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat odpowiedzialności ministra za niewykonanie prawa Unii Europejskiej
Legal opinion on the responsibility of a minister for non-compliance with European Union law
Autorzy:
Czarny, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215753.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
minister
Constitutional liability
Tribunal of State
European Union
Opis:
Council and European Parliament regulations are legal acts which are directly applicable in the Polish legal order, what results in an requirement of their application by all public authorities without issuing national executive acts. Non-execution by a minister of EU acts may consist in a desistence of material and organizational activities required for their practical application. Violation of the law by the ministers results in their political responsibility. Moreover a criminal responsibility for failing to perform official duties may be imposed on former and current ministers. With regard to constitutional liability, its application may be made with a precedent judgment of the Tribunal of State. This liability may be limited by the limitation period.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 2(54); 49-56
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wymogów formalnych, które spełniać powinien akt oskarżenia przed Trybunałem Stanu
Legal opinion on the formal requirements to be met by indictments lodged before the Tribunal of State
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6573195.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Tribunal of State
constitutional accountability
Code of Criminal Procedure
indictment
Opis:
Formal requirements, which must be met by the resolution of the Sejm on constitutional accountability of the persons referred to in Article 1, para. 1, subparas 2–7 of the Act on the Tribunal of State, must be reconstructed under the provisions of that Act, as well as the Code of Criminal Procedure which is applicable – as appropriate – in the proceedings before the State Tribunal and the Committee on Constitutional Accountability, unless specified otherwise in the Act. The resolution of the Sejm to hold a person constitutionally accountable and the accompanying resolution of the Constitutional Accountability Committee should meet the requirements for an indictment, resulting from the Code of Criminal Procedure, which regulates the matter of the indictment.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 60-66
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie zakresu kompetencji przewodniczącego oraz Prezydium Komisji Odpowiedzialności Konstytucyjnej
Legal opinion on the scope of competence of chairperson and presidium of the Constitutional Accountability Committee
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6567744.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Accountability Committee
Sejm Committee
constitutional accountability
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Tribunal of State
Opis:
The opinion points out that a key role in the preparation of preliminary motions to hold persons accountable before the Tribunal of State is played by the Constitutional Accountability Committee acting in corpore. The Commission has an exclusive power to take substantive decisions concerning the conduct of proceedings relating, e.g., to an assessment of the validity of the submitted motions as to evidence. The tasks of presidium and chairperson of the Committee are, in principle, limited to organizational and technical issues, such as planning a timetable of committee meetings and proposing the agenda of the debate (presidium) and representing the Committee in external events, as well as hearing witnesses and experts (chairperson). The performance of the presidium or chairperson is reviewed by the Committee. In the event of a negative assessment of the work of these authorities, the Committee has the power to make appropriate changes in membership of the presidium, including changing its chairperson.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 3(47); 78-83
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Koszty postępowania przed Trybunałem Konstytucyjnym
Costs of Proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal
Autorzy:
Warciński, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2196873.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
costs of proceedings
Constitutional Tribunal
Opis:
The author points out that the issue of costs of proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal has not been elaborated in the literature so far, whereas it is of practical importance, although not as great as the institution of civil trial costs in particular. However, this issue is an interesting subject of legal interpretation and inference. The paper discusses the functions of costs of proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal, their scope and the rules for their adjudication. In conclusion, it was found that the regulation of this institution is defective, as it contains significant gaps that need to be filled by way of appropriate or analogous application of several other normative acts. This led the author to postulate de lege ferenda that this state of affairs should be changed.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 4(72); 42-56
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zgodność z Konstytucją RP niektórych przepisów ustawy o Instytucie Pamięci Narodowej – Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu – wniosek Prezydenta RP do TK (sygn. akt K 1/18)
Conformity to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of certain rules of the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation – application of the President of the Republic (ref. no. K 1/18)
Autorzy:
Bucińska, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211895.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Institute of National Remembrance
Constitutional Tribunal
Opis:
The author of the draft position claims that the rules in question – regarding the phrases “Ukrainian nationalists” and “Eastern Małopolska” conform to the Constitution. Article 55a para. 1, which set outs sanctions of fine or imprisonment for up to 3 years, imposed to anyone who attributing, publicly and contrary to facts, the responsibility or coresponsibility to the Polish Nation or to the Polish State for Nazi crimes committed by the Third German Reich or for other offenses constituting crimes against peace, humanity or war crimes, or in a different way grossly reduces the responsibility of the actual perpetrators of these crimes, conforms to the the Constitution. Moreover, the above-mentioned sanctions do not violate the principle of proportionality.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 2(58); 262-301
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją przepisów ustawy – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego w zakresie terminu do wniesienia skargi o wznowienie postępowania
Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of provisions of the Act – the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to deadline for bringing a complaint regarding for resumption of proceedings
Autorzy:
Spyra, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216087.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Civil Procedure
Opis:
In his position, the Sejm requested the Constitutional Tribunal to state that to the extent, in which provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure provide for a three-month period for filing complaint concerning the resumption of proceedings in case the judgment was based on a counterfeit or falsified document, and to the extent that the failure to meet this deadline results in the rejection of the complaint, conform to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, an allegation of a disproportionately short deadline is unjustified, as the deadline of three months to perform a specific procedural activity is one of the longest ones provided for in the Polish civil procedure and does not differ from the ones provided for in the civil procedural laws of other European countries. The practice of application by common courts of the provision in question also justifies the position indicating conformity to the Constitution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 263-278
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 5/14
Sejm draft position on the case concerning the application of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights on the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ref. No. K 5/14)
Autorzy:
Iwański, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6586928.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Criminal Procedure
Opis:
In the proposed draft position the author claims that the challenged provisions do not exclude the possibility of participating in the meeting of the appellate court. However, admitting the possibility of limiting the participation of the accused, or his counsel, in such meetings of appellate court, they affect the scope of use of that right. This matter affects both the right of the defense in both the material sense (attending the meeting) and the formal one (limitations on actions of the defender). One should recognize that the provisions at issue, as far as they do not guarantee the accused or his counsel the right to participate in the meeting of the court hearing the interlocutory appeal against the ruling on the application, repeal or change of preventive measures other than pre-trial detention and property collateral, is incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution. According to the author, it is also reasonable to apply for discontinuance of the proceedings in relation to the remaining scope of the application due to the inadmissibility of rendering the judgment.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 253-287
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Termin do wytoczenia powództwa o zaprzeczenie ojcostwa
Deadline concerning bringing an action for denial of paternity
Autorzy:
Bucińska, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215606.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
right of filiation
denial of paternity
Opis:
The author of the draft position of the Sejm notes that the challenged provision, understood in such a way, that deadline for bringing an action for denial of paternity may expire before a child acquires knowledge about his/her biological origin, is inconsistent with the Constitution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 4(56); 250-270
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt P 12/14
Sejm draft position on case ref. no. P 12/14
Autorzy:
Tomaszewska, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223430.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitution
Constitutional Tribunal
Code of Civil Procedure
Opis:
The position of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerns Article 207 § 3 second sentence in conjunction with § 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP), establishing a procedure for consent by order of the president for bringing further writings preparatory to pleading in the course of the case, and Article 207 § 4 CCP which provides the possibility of an oral hearing of the parties in closed session before the first hearing, if the president call upon the parties to submit additional clarification on the issue, in terms of their compliance with Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution, which establishes the right to a court hearing. In the author’s view, there should be declared compliance of the above provisions of the Act with the Constitution because in the challenged Article 207 § 4 CCP the lawmaker uses the plural to describe the addressee of the norm, so from this provision it follows an obligation to inform about the meeting and the possibility of participation of both parties, as well as entities acting as a party. Moreover, in support of the declaration of compliance of Article 207 § 3 the author presents the fundamental principles of civil process, such as the concentration of the evidence, judicial consideration of the case without undue delay, and the duty of the court and the parties to smoothly and timely completion of the proceedings. Motion has been made for cancellation of the case due to inadmissibility of the judgment on the basis of Art. 39 para. 1 subpara. 1 of the Constitutional Tribunal Act.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 246-266
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 53/13
Sejm draft position on the case ref. No. K 53/13
Autorzy:
Brzozowski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543136.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Constitution
Minister of National Defence
Constitutional Tribunal
Opis:
The proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal in this case were initiated by a group of Deputies who questioned the constitutionality of some provisions of the Act of 21 June 2013 amending the Act on the Office of the Minister of National Defence and other acts. The Sejm did not share the arguments of the applicant. The abolishment of the posts of the commanders of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Special Forces (and their corresponding commands) accompanied by the creation of the posts of General Commander of the Branches of the Armed Forces and Operational Commander of the Branches of the Armed Forces is within the regulatory discretion of the legislature. The constitutional position of Chief of General Staff has not weakened, and the changes resulting from the Amending Act do not go beyond the framework set by the relevant constitutional provision. Entrusting to the President of the Republic of the competence to appoint – at the request of the Prime Minister – a person “designated for an appointment as Commander‑in‑Chief of the Armed Forces” has a strong constitutional grounds and ensures efficient procedure for filling the position of Commander‑in‑Chief for a period of war. In addition, the procedure in which the amendment was made did not infringe the principle of proper legislation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 223-258
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies