Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Concentration camps" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Męska homoseksualność obozowa i figura pipla a problem „nieczytalności” na przykładzie relacji Andrzeja Kotarskiego
    Male Concentration Camp Homosexuality, the Figure of Pipel and the Issue of 'Unreadability' in Andrzej Kotarski’s Testimonies
    Autorzy:
    Kumala, Aleksandra
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2056671.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-23
    Wydawca:
    Ośrodek Pamięć i Przyszłość
    Tematy:
    homosexual relations
    concentration camps
    pipel
    relacje homoseksualne
    obozy koncentracyjne
    Opis:
    Artykuł o charakterze case study analizuje treści dotyczące męskiej homoseksualności i figury pipla, pojawiające się w dwóch relacjach złożonych USC Shoah Foundation i Domu Spotkań z Historią/Ośrodkowi KARTA przez Andrzeja Kotarskiego, byłego więźnia nazistowskich obozów koncentracyjnych. Krytycznej refleksji poddane zostają: sposób podjęcia tematów zmarginalizowanych w polskim dyskursie obozowym oraz strategie służące przezwyciężeniu problemów artykulacyjnych. Osadzenie analizy w kontekście badań nad wojenną przemocą (homo)seksualną pozwala wskazać kulturowo-społeczne determinanty, za sprawą których obie relacje pozostają niepełne.
    The article is a case study analyzing the issues of male homosexuality and the figure of pipel, which appear in two oral testimonies of Andrzej Kotarski – former prisoner of the Nazi concentration camps – given respectively to the USC Shoah Foundation and the History Meetings House/KARTA Center. The ways of addressing themes marginalized in the Polish concentration camp discourse, as well as the strategies used to overcome articulation problems, are being critically examined. Placing the analysis in the context of wartime (homo)sexual violence makes it possible to point out cultural and social determinants because of which both testimonies remain incomplete.
    Źródło:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej; 2021, 11; 52-71
    2719-7522
    2084-0578
    Pojawia się w:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O relacjach byłych więźniów kacetów w kontekście czasu, miejsca i sytuacji ich powstania (albo o pożytkach z historii mówionej)
    On the accounts of former prisoners of Nazi concentration camps in the context of time, space and circumstances in which they were recorded (or on the benefits of oral history)
    Autorzy:
    Filipkowski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/634760.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Ośrodek Pamięć i Przyszłość
    Tematy:
    oral history
    więźniowie nazistowskich obozów koncentracyjnych
    Auschwitz-Birkenau
    prisoners of Nazi concentration camps
    Mauthausen Survivors Documentation Project
    Opis:
    One of the main objections against oral history interviews is their retrospective character – the distance from the time of events which are covered by the interviews. While it is not the distance itself that is the issue but its deforming potential: the susceptibility of memory to later, in relation to the discussed events, influences. Another issue is the influence of an interview situation itself, relation between the person documenting interview / the researcher and the so-called witness to history.  The text starts with those theoretical and methodological questions and considers them on the example of concrete, empirical material. The material is the so-called representations of former Auschwitz prisoners gathered through decades by the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum as well as biographic and narrative interviews with the same people recorded in years 2002–2003 for the Mauthausen Survivors Documentation Project and archived in the Oral History Archive of the Karta Center and the History Meeting House.  Thorough comparison of both accounts from the same person delivered orally at a different time, place and in a different context (biographic, social, historical) conducted by different institutions and on the basis of different methodologies allows one to analyze the influence of different contexts on the content of the stories told. The effect of those analyses is a new picture of dependencies between the memory of experience of there and then and the entanglement of stories of this experience with the here and now reality. This picture seems quite distant both from naive realism as well as – although today it may seem quite surprising – from extreme constructivism. Analyzed accounts prove to be quite stable and resistant to the lapse of time as well as the current context of an interview situation. In this last regard, on the basis of analyzed sources, one can formulate some methodological postulates related to its impact. 
    One of the main objections against oral history interviews is their retrospective character – the distance from the time of events which are covered by the interviews. While it is not the distance itself that is the issue but its deforming potential: the susceptibility of memory to later, in relation to the discussed events, influences. Another issue is the influence of an interview situation itself, relation between the person documenting interview / the researcher and the so-called witness to history.  The text starts with those theoretical and methodological questions and considers them on the example of concrete, empirical material. The material is the so-called representations of former Auschwitz prisoners gathered through decades by the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum as well as biographic and narrative interviews with the same people recorded in years 2002–2003 for the Mauthausen Survivors Documentation Project and archived in the Oral History Archive of the Karta Center and the History Meeting House.  Thorough comparison of both accounts from the same person delivered orally at a different time, place and in a different context (biographic, social, historical) conducted by different institutions and on the basis of different methodologies allows one to analyze the influence of different contexts on the content of the stories told. The effect of those analyses is a new picture of dependencies between the memory of experience of there and then and the entanglement of stories of this experience with the here and now reality. This picture seems quite distant both from naive realism as well as – although today it may seem quite surprising – from extreme constructivism. Analyzed accounts prove to be quite stable and resistant to the lapse of time as well as the current context of an interview situation. In this last regard, on the basis of analyzed sources, one can formulate some methodological postulates related to its impact. 
    Źródło:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej; 2012, 2; 37-71
    2719-7522
    2084-0578
    Pojawia się w:
    Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies