Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Dewanti, Lantun Paradhita" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Analysis of Stingray Catches which Landed in Fish Landing Site of Labuan Bajo, West Manggarai Regency of East Nusa Tenggara
    Autorzy:
    Asut, Helena
    Hamdani, Herman
    Junianto, Junianto
    Dewanti, Lantun Paradhita
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1076712.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Naukowych Darwin / Scientific Publishing House DARWIN
    Tematy:
    Aetobatus narinari
    Dasyatis kuhlli
    Himantura granulata
    Himantura uarnak
    Pastinachus sephen
    Sex Ratio
    Stingray
    Stingray Size
    Stingray Type
    Taeniura lymma
    Opis:
    The purpose of the study was to determine the sustainability status of Stingray capture to determine the feasibility of catching Stingray in the waters of West Manggarai Regency. The research method used is the survey method, and this was conducted in July 2018 until mid-September 2018. The parameters studied included the type of Stingray, size and sex ratio. The results showed that the Stingray species found were A. narinari, D. kuhlii, H. granulata, H. uarnak, P. sephen, and T. lymma, with species diversity still stable (H' = 1,4). The average size of Stingray species caught makes it, however, not worth catching. Comparison of the Stingray sex ratio shows that T. lymma and H. granulata species were unbalanced, thus they should not be caught. D. kuhli and H. uarnak are still in balance so they can still be harvested. Based on conservation status in IUCN, the stingray that had the most severe threat status was H. granulata and H. uarnak, thus, these should not be harvested at all.
    Źródło:
    World News of Natural Sciences; 2019, 24; 89-99
    2543-5426
    Pojawia się w:
    World News of Natural Sciences
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Relationship between Benthic Macrofauna Community Structure and Density of Mangrove Vegetation in Mempawah Mangrove Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Autorzy:
    Noviatri, Syafira Eka
    Zahidah, Zahidah
    Herawati, Heti
    Dewanti, Lantun Paradhita
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1031497.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Naukowych Darwin / Scientific Publishing House DARWIN
    Tematy:
    Community Structure
    Density
    Macro-faunal benthic
    Mangrove
    Mempawah Mangrove Park
    Opis:
    This research was conducted in Mempawah Mangrove Park, West Kalimantan on July – August 2018. The research aims to map the benthic macrofauna community structure and its relationship with the structure of mangrove vegetation. The research method was a survey and use purposive sampling data method in observation stations based on different stages of mangrove vegetation. The observation stations consists of Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa as the species of mangroves. Station 1 consists of mangroves in seedling size, station 2 consists of mangroves in pole size, and station 3 consists of mangrove trees. The benthic macrofauna consist of 8 species from 3 different classes, merostomata, malacostraca, and gastropods. The highest abundance value (155 ind/m2), diversity index (1,875) and similarity index (0,668) is in station 2. The relationship between benthic macrofauna abundance and mangrove density has -0,356 as the correlation coefficient which indicates that an increase of benthic macrofauna abundance is in line with the decrease of mangrove density. High density value in research shows that the mangrove is in seedling size, and vice versa a low density value indicates the mangrove trees. The coefficient of determination (0,1272) indicating that the abundance of benthic macrofauna is affected by the mangrove density as 12,72% and 87,28% affected by other factors.
    Źródło:
    World News of Natural Sciences; 2020, 33; 38-47
    2543-5426
    Pojawia się w:
    World News of Natural Sciences
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Length-Weight Relationship and Catch Size of Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) Landed in Benoa, Bali, Indonesia
    Autorzy:
    Ahmad, Fadhilah
    Dewanti, Lantun Paradhita
    Arnenda, Gussasta Levi
    Rizal, Achmad
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1076794.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Naukowych Darwin / Scientific Publishing House DARWIN
    Tematy:
    Benoa Fishing Port
    Bigeye tuna
    Thunnus obesus
    catch size
    isometric
    length-weight
    main catch
    Opis:
    The research was conducted at the Tuna Fisheries Research Station, Denpasar, Bali, in July 2018 (3 weeks duration). There were several types of high-value fish incorporated into this research: tuna, skipjack, shrimp, cob, mackerel, snapper, squid, reef fish (grouper, baronang, lobster / barong shrimp) and ornamental fish. Seaweed processing was also assessed. Benoa Fishing Port is one of the tuna landing base bases in Indonesia. It is the main port in Bali Province and ranks beside Muara Baru (Jakarta), Pelabuhan Ratu (West Java) and Cilacap (Central Java). This research aim to identified length-weight relationship, and proportion of proper catch size of bigeye tuna. Herein, bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) was identified visually and then assessed. The first identifier is the large size of the eye. The growth pattern of big eye tuna (Thunnus obesus) landed in Benoa Fishing Portis is isometric, where the length increase is equal to weight gain (isometric positive). The length distribution of big eye tuna was in range of 81-170 cm FL (334 fishes are obtained), and the distribution of weights varied in size from 11-95 kg, with the most common catch size being in the range of 16-20 kg (95 fishes). Of note, 60% of the fish had not reached the proper catch size.
    Źródło:
    World News of Natural Sciences; 2019, 23; 34-42
    2543-5426
    Pojawia się w:
    World News of Natural Sciences
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies