Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Św. Tomasz z Akwinu" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Arystoteles czy św. Tomasz z Akwinu? Głębsze rozumienie intelektu
Aristotle or St. Thomas Aquinas? Deeper the understanding of intellect
Autorzy:
Zaorski, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1008974.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-10-03
Wydawca:
Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
Tematy:
intelekt
dusza
nieśmiertelność
św. Tomasz z Akwinu
Arystoteles
St. Thomas Aquinas
Aristotle
intellect
soul
immortality
Opis:
The presented concept of intellect shows the size and innovation of St. Thomas Aquinas. As opposed to Aristotle, St. Thomas explains the nature of intellect more precisely. Aristotle used only one concept in describing form and matter. However, this was not enough to show the existence of intellect a
Źródło:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 31, 3; 80-90
0209-3782
2719-7530
Pojawia się w:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Angel in “the Cartesian theatre” – Aquinas and the mind-body problem
Autorzy:
Stępień, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035632.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-10-30
Wydawca:
Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
Tematy:
Św. Tomasz z Akwinu
dualizm substancjalny
Teatr Kartezjański
St Thomas Aquinas
mind-body problem
Cartesian theatre
Opis:
One of the solutions of the mind-body problem, which returns to the philosophical discussion on consciousness is the “soul hyphotesis”. Existence of the soul can clear the “explanatory gap”, but it brings yet another problems in explanation of how consciousness works. The magiority of those issues exist because of very specific understanding of the mind-body relations in Cartesian way as two separated substances. Some of the schoars propose to overlap the Cartesian approach by returning to the philosophy of St Thomas Aquinas. This article shows that in the writings of Aquinas we can find exact analogy of the Cartesian view of the body-soul relations in the description of how immaterial angel assums the body. For Aquinas angel exist and acts in assumed human body in the very same way as Descartes describes the soul acting in human body, and angel’s mode of perception is similar to what is usually called as “the Cartesian theatre”. For Aquinas angel in assumed body cannot perfom any human action, it only pretends to perform it, because it operates bodily organs as the form, which is not united with this specific body. St Thomas explanation of the relation of body and soul in human being relies on the claim of unity of body and soul, which together are one substance. Such approach was even called biological, because of the stress on the role which body plays in human actions. Therefore Aquinas proposition could be perceived the way of overcoming the dualism and removing some of the dilemas which are linked with “soul hypothesis” understood in traditional way.
Źródło:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 31, 3; 66-79
0209-3782
2719-7530
Pojawia się w:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stróżowanie aniołów jako przejaw Bożej Opatrznościwg „Sumy teologii” św. Tomasza z Akwinu
Guarding Role of Angels as an aspect of Divine Providence in Summa Theologicaof St. Thomas Aquinas
Autorzy:
Kaczyński, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1008764.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-03-05
Wydawca:
Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
Tematy:
anioły stróże
św. Tomasz z Akwinu
Opatrzność
rządy Boże
guardian angels
St. Thomas Aquinas
Providence
Divine government
Opis:
St. Thomas Aquinas wrote in ST II-II, q.2, a.7., that the first man could get know about Incarnation of Christ in future. The way of knowing of that is experience of marriage, witch is described by St. Poul as „great mystery”, „concerning Christ and the church” (Eph 5). In Thomas’s Commentary on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians we can read, that this link between husband-wife relation and Christchurchrelation was known for the first man by supernatural knowledge. Before Summa Thomas wrote that the first man could have unclear knowledge about Incarnation: if man strays, God will want repair it, because it is result of his mercy (Commentary on the Sentences Book) or providence (De Veritate). In ST this clear knowledge is only about this aspect of Incarnation mystery, with is linked with Consummatio gratiae; the first man didn’t know about passion and death of Christ, because he couldn’t know about his own sin in future: their reason. Consumaatio gratiae means the full unite man with God in the end of the world and it’s coresponding with sexual intercourse in marriage. This motive for the Incarnation is not linked with men’s sin. It is in opposition to the view from ST III, q.1, a.3, corp., where St. Thomas wrote that if man had not sinned, the God would not have become incarnate, because everywhere in Sacred Scripture the sin of the first man isassigned as the reason for the Incarnation.
Źródło:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne; 2019, 32, 2; 30-46
0209-3782
2719-7530
Pojawia się w:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rozum wobec wiary – współczesna pokusa gnostycyzmu
Reason in relation to faith – the contemporary temptation of Gnosticism
Autorzy:
Tatar, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1008829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-01-22
Wydawca:
Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
Tematy:
Duchowość
mistyka
poznanie
wiedza
wiara
św. Tomasz z Akwinu
św. Jan od Krzyża
racjonalizm
człowiek
antropologia teologiczna
Spirituality
mysticism
knowledge
cognition
faith
St. Thomas Aquinas
St. John of the Cross
rationalism
man
theological anthropology
Opis:
The Pope Francis in his Apostolic exhortation Gaudete et exultate points to two serious modern threats: Pelagianism and Gnosticism. Historical analysis of Gnosticism reveals a dangerous tendency towards rationalism. It also results, as Cardinal J. Ratzinger points, from the relativization of truth. The rejection of God in modern civilization must give rise to human concentration on oneself. This means that contemporary Gnosticism wants to lead to self-salvation, which means that it closes man in subjectivism and the intellectual ability to rise above the mystery of Jesus Christ. Analysis of the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas and St. John Paul II indicates the consistency of faith and reason. At the same time, we note the limitations of human cognition and understanding resulting from its nature. God’s truths are rational but beyond human capabilities, and therefore the faith can’t be reduced to the rationalist category. St. John of the Cross states thatthis crossing of the border takes place in cognition through love.
Źródło:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne; 2019, 32, 1; 6-24
0209-3782
2719-7530
Pojawia się w:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies