Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "tsar Peter" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Kwestia Patriarchatu Bułgarskiego w 1. poł. X wieku
The question of the Bulgarian Patriarchate during the first half of the 10th century
Autorzy:
Leszka, Mirosław J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613177.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Kościół bułgarski IX-X w.
patriarchat bułgarski
car Symeon
car Piotr
Bulgarian Church IX-X c.
Bulgarian patriarchate
tsar Symeon
tsar Peter
Opis:
One of the key points of tsar Symeon’s political program was achieving autocephaly for the Bulgarian church and making its head a Patriarch. It is possible that the archbishop of Bulgaria was proclaimed a Patriarch (913) without Byzantine consent, but the sources only allow for attempting to show that this matter was reflected in the peace treaty concluded after Symeon’s death (927) by Peter, his son.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2013, 59; 581-590
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola cara Piotra (927-969) w życiu bułgarskiego Kościoła. Kilka uwag
The role of tsar Peter (927-969) in the life of the Bulgarian Church. A few remarks
Autorzy:
Leszka, Mirosław J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/611888.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
car Piotr (927-969)
bogomilizm
Kościół bułgarski
średniowieczny monastycyzm bułgarski
tsar Peter (927-969)
bogomilism
Bulgarian Church
Bulgarian medieval monasticism
Opis:
Tsar Peter was a ruler who was active in the sphere of church policy, and is pictured to have been a deep believer himself. He is credited with the fact of granting the title of patriarch to the Bulgarian archbishop, which most probably occurred under the framework of the agreement of 927 (?933/934). The act symbolically completed the process of acquiring full maturity and independence by the Church of Bulgaria. Peter, as the first Bulgarian ruler, had to face a serious problem of heresy. Being fully aware of responsibility for orthodoxy of his subjects’ creed, he was determined enough to take precautions in order to stifle the development of the Bogomil heresy. However, his actual actions (except for his consulting the patriarch) and their results are impossible to pinpoint. On the other hand, it should be stressed that, during the rule of tsar Peter, the Bulgarian monasticism lived through a period of considerable development. The tsar contributed to that progress, though, unfortunately, details of the phenomenon are impossible to determine. Peter himself became a monk before his death, and subsequently his personal worship evolved around his involvement in the monastic movement.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2016, 66; 429-442
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Car bułgarski Piotr (927-969) w bizantyńskiej historiografii X-XII wieku
Bulgarian tsar Peter (927-969) in the Byzantine historiography of the 10th-12th centuries
Autorzy:
Leszka, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613070.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
car Piotr (927-969)
historiografii bizantyńska
Kontynuacja Teofanesa
Jan Skylitzes
Symeon Logoteta
tsar Peter (927-969)
Byzantine historiography
Continuation of Theophanes
John Skylitzes
Symeon Logothete
Opis:
Byzantine historians tied Peter primarily with the establishment of the lasting peace with the Empire in 927. In the sources that present the events from before the reign of the emperor Nikephor Phokas (963-969), when the relations between both states deteriorated, Peter is commonly portrayed as a peacemaker, a deeply religious man, accepting of the Byzantine way of understanding the role of the ruler in religious matters. However, Byzantine authors point out that Peter was able to successfully secure his position and ruthlessly deal with his enemies. The sources describing the events from the last years of his reign portray him as a prideful person, daring to stand up against the Byzantine basileÚj, and who gets rightfully and severely punished for his actions. It should be noted that most often the Byzantine authors did not describe their attitude towards Peter, and did not judge him directly. This results in the reader having to build the image of the Bulgarian ruler himself, based on how the sources describe the events concerning his reign.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2018, 70; 339-354
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies