Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "obowiązków" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Znaczenie przesłanki „ciężkiego naruszenia podstawowych obowiązków” w rozwiązaniu stosunku pracy bez wypowiedzenia przez pracownika i pracodawcę
Autorzy:
Michał, Skąpski,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902977.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
termination of labour contract without notice
premises
serious breach of basic obligations
rozwiązanie stosunku pracy bez wypowiedzenia
przesłanki
ciężkie naruszenie podstawowych obowiązków
Opis:
The article deals with the problem of understanding of the notion of “serious breach of basic obligations” which is a premise of termination of labour contract without notice both for employer and employee. Because the the regulation is based on the same notion, in jurisprudence it is understood unanimously in most cases. The article contradicts this point of view and arguments, that the same notion “serious breach of basic obligations” should be interpreted in different ways for employer and employee. The reason is first of all the different meaning of guilt in breach of contract for employer and employee. While employee’s breach of contract must be faulted, in case of employer his guilt is not necessary. It means, that the employee is entitled to terminate the employment contract also in cases of non-culpable breach of contract by employer.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 78; 402-413
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Intricacies of Significant Imbalance as the Cornerstone of Protection against Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts under EU Law
Autorzy:
Piotr, Sitnik,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902399.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-03-11
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations
consumer interests
unfair terms
Directive 93/13
good faith
znacząca nierównowaga praw i obowiązków stron
interesy konsumenta
klauzule niedozwolone
Dyrektywa 93/13
dobre obyczaje
Opis:
Significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties to a consumer contract term is, together with good faith, a fundamental pillar of substantive protection against unfair terms. It is the primary tool provided by Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts with a view to mitigating differences in bargaining power between professional traders and consumer on the ever-expanding capitalistic market within the EU. The paper comprehensively reviews the meaning of the “significant imbalance” element by reference to a cross-section of judgments handed by the CJEU and Polish courts. Generally, albeit with a few notable exceptions, the former court has engaged in a subjective-objective exercise aimed at discovering what the balance of rights and obligations would have been between the parties in the particular dispute at hand had it not been for the purportedly unfair clause. Besides that, the requirement has been utilized to impose ad bolster a host of information duties levied on traders so that protection is extended to cases where the consumer is unaware of their rights or are deterred from enforcing them due to procedural obstacles or prohibitive costs of judicial or administrative proceedings. The requirement of significant balance, rooted in the idea that the disproportion of market power between the parties to a disputed term necessitates government or judicial intervention to achieve or restore contractual equilibrium, is shown from a plethora of angles: its ideological foundations, practical connotations, its emphasis on consumer vulnerability and approach to economic power. Assistance and inspiration re gleaned from Polish jurisprudence where numerous questions either unanswered by the CJEU or left to the consideration of national courts, particularly the relation between reasonableness, on the one hand, and significant imbalance and good faith on the other, as well as between significant imbalance and good faith, have been tackled.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 82; 227-262
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies