Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "compromise" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Foundations of the Uncodified Historical Constitution of Hungary
Autorzy:
Zsófia, Biró,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902459.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-19
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Golden Bull
Hungarian uncodified constitution
Doctrine of the Holy Crown
Pragmatic Sanction
Austro-Hungarian Compromise
Złota bulla
węgierska konstytucja materialna
Korona świętego Stefana
Sankcja Pragmatyczna
kompromis austriacko-węgierski
Opis:
The article examines the evolution of the Hungarian Public and Constitutional Law from 1301 until the Austro-Hungarian compromise in 1867. The topic is highly relevant, because the year 2017 marked the 330th anniversary of the 1st and 2nd Act of 1687, which state that the Habsburgs are the only and true heirs of the Hungarian throne; it also marked the 150th anniversary of the Austro-Hungarian Compromise. Furthermore the current Fundamental Law says that “We honour the achievements of our historical constitution and we honour the Holy Crown, which embodies the constitutional continuity of Hungary’s statehood and the unity of the nation”. The main chain of thoughts of the article presents the crown-ideology and the Doctrine of the Holy Crown, the Rákos field resolution of 1505, the Acts 2 and 3 of 1687, the Pragmatic Sanction, Acts 10 and 12 of 1790, the public law aspects of the April Laws of 1848, and the laws on the Austro-Hungarian Compromise. The article presents the fundamental documents of the Hungarian uncodified historical Constitution issued within the given period. Through their formation and historical background we can truly understand the Hungarian customary law and the legal traditions, which are still honoured by our present Fundamental Law.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2019, 80; 39-58
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aktualne problemy postępowania pojednawczego
Autorzy:
Mikołaj, Ciesliński, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902888.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-10-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
summoned to compromise
conciliatory court proceeding
court settlement
mutual concessions
interruption the limitation period
abuse of law
postępowanie pojednawcze
zawezwanie do próby ugodowej
ugoda sądowa
wzajemne ustępstwa
przerwanie biegu przedawnienia
nadużycie prawa
Opis:
The text refers to the evolution and problems with interpretation of provisions of conciliatory court proceeding in Polish law. Conciliatory court proceeding is regulated by articles 184–186 KPC (The Civil Proceedings Code). Author considers the role of that institution and indicates that although there was not many amendments in above provision of law there was some important court decision relating to this proceeding. Also views of doctrine is still developing. Contemporary conciliatory court proceeding can be used to the all cases that could be terminated by agreement also these that are non-litigious proceedings. It should be noticed that in practice the main role of the conciliatory court proceedings is to interrupt the limitation period. However part of the subjects in civil procedure use the institution contrary to law. They are not interested in agreement but they want only to interrupt the limitation period multiple time to keep their claim. Such way of using conciliatory court proceeding should be treated as abuse of law. Author also shows how important is right classification of conciliatory court proceeding. It can even influence the proper learning process at University. Finally there are presented proposed amendments in law prepared in Government’s Draft of 27th November 2017 relating to the conciliatory court proceeding. Author assumes that conclusion of agreement in conciliatory court proceeding is proper way to finish dispute between the parties. It gives possibility to reduce costs, time and even make people to forget and reconcile animosity.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 75; 19-29
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies