Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "amendment" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9
    Tytuł:
    Nowelizacje kodeksu karnego w zakresie zatarcia skazania
    Autorzy:
    Anna, Zientara,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902376.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    expungement
    penal code
    amendment
    Opis:
    The article discusses and evaluates changes in the institution of the expungement introduced by the Act of 20th February 2015 and Act of 11th March 2016. The most important change includes shortening the deadlines for expungement to a fine and restriction of liberty. Moreover nowadays all penal measures stated for life may be recognized executed. This solution allows erasing such conviction.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 65; 189-202
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przepadek w znowelizowanym kodeksie karnym
    Autorzy:
    Magdalena, Błaszczyk,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902770.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    forfeiture
    amendment
    Penal Code
    a legal presumption
    Opis:
    Under the Act of 20 February 2015 – changing the Penal Code and some other acts, from 1 July 2015 the forfeiture has been removed from the catalogue of penalties – the art. 39 point 4 of the Penal Code was repealed – and also from the catalogue of security measures of an administrative nature – the wording of the art. 99 § 1 of the Penal Code has been changed, the art. 100 of the Penal Code has been repealed and its content has been transferred to the art. 49a of the Penal Code. Currently, the forfeiture is fully regulated in chapter Va of the Penal Code, entitled „Forfeiture and compensatory measures”. Changing the normative status of the forfeiture is not understood. I consider it as a mistake. This change was not associated with changes of the normative status of forfeiture in the Fiscal Penal Code and Code of Offences. Besides the changes concerning the status of the forfeiture which has obviously system nature under the amendment came to repeal the provisions of articles 44 § 8, 45 § 6 and art. 45 § 4 of the Penal Code. These were changes of organizational character. They were accompanied by changes in the provisions of the Executive Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, which took over the content of the repealed provisions of the Penal Code. The wording of the art. 45 § 3 of the Penal Code regulating one of the legal presumptions relating to the forfeiture of financial benefits has been changed. This has increased the warranty standard of that provision.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 65; 93-107
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Istota i formy ilościowych przekształceń przedmiotowych w polskim procesie cywilnym
    Autorzy:
    Anna, Wiśniewska,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902720.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-10-23
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    subject matter of proceedings
    statement of claim
    cumulation of substantive claims
    procedural request
    amendment of claim
    amendment
    of the subject of claim
    quantitative amendment of claim
    cumulative amendment of claim
    limitation of claim
    przedmiot procesu
    pozew
    powództwo
    kumulacja roszczeń
    żądanie pozwu
    przekształcenie powództwa
    przedmiotowe przekształcenie powództwa
    ilościowe przekształcenie powództwa
    przekształcenie kumulatywne powództwa
    ograniczenie powództwa
    Opis:
    The Polish Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) does regulate the amendments of the subject of claim in Art. 193. It must be observed that the Code (similar to the former Code of Civil Procedure of 1932) does not supply a statutory definition of the amendment of claim, leaving this matter to the theory of civil procedure; the regulation is only concerned with the admissibility of a change. Speaking in most general terms, an amendment of a claim is a procedural act which results in transformation of particular elements of the claim, thus directly influencing the proceedings. However, the continuity of the proceedings before and after the amendment must be preserved, in the sense that earlier procedural acts of the parties and evidence collected remain at least partially pertinent. The claimant’s act amending the claim may as well limit as extend the subject matter of the proceedings. It can also, obviously, contain as well an amendment of the requested remedy as the factual basis of the claim. A separate amendment of only one of those elements seems also possible. As a quantitative amendment of the claim must also be considered the introduction of a new claim besides the original one (a cumulative amendment). Such an amendment is expressly provided by Art. 193 § 2 CCP. It must be stressed that, as a matter of fact, the extension of the claim in a cumulative form, as regulated in Art. 193§ 2 CPC, shall produce the identical result as if the claimant already in the statement of claim availed of a possibility provided in Art. 191 CCP, namely to cumulate more than one substantive law claim in one statement of claim against the same respondent. The claimant’s procedural acts aimed at the quantitative amendment of the claim include also the limitation of the claim, thus resulting in the limitation of the subject matter of the proceedings. Undoubtedly, the limitation of the claim is a party’s procedural act bearing upon the court’s decision.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2018, 75; 237-247
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Katalog środków karnych w świetle nowelizacji kodeksu karnego ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem zakazu prowadzenia pojazdów
    Autorzy:
    Valeri, Vachev,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902697.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    penal measures
    interdiction to driving vehicles
    amendment to the Penal Code
    Opis:
    This article focuses on presenting the changes implemented to the systematics of penal measures resulting from the amendments made to the Penal Code in 2015. The author pays particular attention to the legislator’s decision to remove confiscation, obligation to pay damages/compensation and punitive damages contained in the catalogue of penal measures in art. 39 of the Penal Code and transferring them to a new chapter „Va” of the Penal Code, which thereby differentiates two new categories of penal measures. The main part of the text concentrates on presenting and analysing the implemented changes within the scope of the regulation of penal measures with regards to the interdiction on driving vehicles (art. 42 of the Penal Code), which are primarily based on extending time limits and the grounds to impose this measure.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 65; 109-120
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Instytucja ciągu przestępstw po 1 lipca 2015 r.
    Autorzy:
    Arkadiusz, Górski,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903066.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-09-12
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    series
    coincidence
    crimes
    amendment
    premises
    ciąg przestępstw
    zbieg
    przestępstwa
    nowelizacja
    przesłanki
    Opis:
    The institution of series of crimes regulates the situation of coincidence of crimes which are connected in a specific way. This connections are ground for different penalty – one penalty for all crimes. The amendment of criminal law, conducted in 2015, made changes also in the chapter IX of the polish criminal code and modified provision 91. The legislator decided to replace some premises. The premise of a similar way of committing a crime was replaced by the premise of using the same opportunity. The amendment also modified a demand of an identical criminal qualification for all crimes covered by the institution of series of crimes. Since then, the demand of an identity has been applied to a provision which is the basis of penalty size. The aim of this paper is to discuss the changes conducted in 2015 and evaluate the whole institution of series of crimes.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2017, 69; 131-148
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Instytucja warunkowego zawieszenia wykonania kary w świetle najnowszych zmian kodeksu karnego (z dnia 1 lipca 2015 r. oraz z dnia 15 kwietnia 2016 r.). Wybrane zagadnienia
    Autorzy:
    Katarzyna, Syroka-Marczewska,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902487.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    suspension of the execution of the penalty
    probation measures
    penal code
    amendment
    Opis:
    The conditional suspension of the execution of the penalty is regulated in the Chapter VIII of the Polish Penal Code. This article presents the current regulation on the subject which came into force on 1 July 2015 and on 15 April 2016. Highlighting the significance of these changes and discussing the rules in force which pertain to submitting the offender to probation, the author additionally points out to the challenges and doubts of the new regulation.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 65; 141-158
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Uwagi do projektu nowelizacji Kodeksu karnego wykonawczego z 29 października 2021 r.
    Autorzy:
    Kaczor, Roman
    Tygielski, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899290.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-11-12
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    executive penal law
    enforcement of prison sentences
    prison system
    prisoners’ rights
    draft amendment
    Opis:
    The authors refer to several aspects of the most recent proposal to amend the Executive Penal Code, published by the Ministry of Justice in autumn 2021 and widely consulted as part of the legislative process. The draft is a voluminous document, 52 pages long, and covers a wide range of issues with varying degree of detail. The article is not intended to offer a comprehensive analysis of the whole project – we confine ourselves to a few threads that, in our opinion, are the most important, as well as require commentary due to their possible consequences for the system of penal executive law and the protection of the rights of persons deprived of their liberty. These are the issues related to the implementation of sentences in the electronic monitoring system, the problem of complaints and judicial control in enforcement proceedings, the institution of “preventive measures” in penitentiary institutions, principles of transferring offenders sentenced to life imprisonment to semi-open and open institutions, authorization of the Minister of Justice to issue a regulation on determining the surface area of living cells, modification of the content of Art. 117 of the Penal Code as a consequence of the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal concerning the treatment and rehabilitation of convicted addicts and the principles of functioning of psychiatric institutions with reinforced and maximum security.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2022, 91; 107-121
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Reforma czy rewolucja? Nowy kształt środków zabezpieczających
    Autorzy:
    Piotr, Kładoczny,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902991.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    protective measures
    Penal Code
    amendment
    guaranteeing function
    proportionality
    punitive measures
    punishment
    addiction
    disorder
    perpetrator
    psychiatric facility
    postpenal measures
    Opis:
    The Act of 20 February 2015 amending the Penal Code and certain other acts introduced a completely new model of protective measures (środki zabezpieczające). The article contains a critical analysis of the principles that lay at the foundation of the legislator’s move to create the current solutions, namely wide application of non-custodial protective measures, execution of those measures only after the execution of the imprisonment sentence and application of protective measures to convicts sentenced to non-custodial punishment. The author also analyses the consequences of applying these principles in particular provisions and the controversy concerning the compliance of the new normative solutions with the Constitution. The author also points to the doubts whether the advantages of extending the application of protective measures will balance the weakening of the guaranteeing function of criminal law.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 65; 175-188
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przedstawiciel społeczny w transparentnym procesie karnym
    Autorzy:
    Paweł, Czarnecki,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902830.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017-09-12
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    social representative
    principle of open proceedings
    Criminal Law Codification Commission
    Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment of 10 June 2016
    interests of justice
    the community organisation
    przedstawiciel społeczny
    zasada jawności
    Komisja Kodyfikacyjna Prawa Karnego
    nowelizacja Kodeksu postępowania karnego
    interes wymiaru sprawiedliwości
    organizacja społeczna
    Opis:
    The article analyses the rights and duties of a social representative in criminal proceedings (article 90 Code of Criminal Procedure). Participation in court proceedings may be declared, before the commencement of judicial examination, by a representative of a community organisation, if there is a need to defend a social interest or an important individual interest within the statutory purposes of such an organisation, especially in matters pertaining to the protection of human rights and freedoms. The representative of a community organisation who has been admitted to participate in court proceedings may participate in the trial, express their points of view and make statements in writing. The court shall admit a representative of a community organisation if it finds this to be in the interests of justice. This person shall not be allowed to ask questions to person questioned by the court, he has no right to make a complaint with the court, can`t submit motions for evidence and are not entitled to participate in a session or in an investigation. The author emphasizes the importance of participation by the citizenry in the administration of justice principle and the right to a fair and public hearing of his case. In article they were also discussed old draft bills in the position of social representative in criminal cases, and in particular the advantages and disadvantages of amending article 90 c.c.p. Amendment of 10 June 2016. The author argues that the changing of position will not increase the participation of the public in the proceedings, because the legislature did not admit procedural rights.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2017, 69; 21-37
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies