Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Rodó" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Ochrona danych genetycznych jako danych osobowych
Autorzy:
Arwid, Mednis,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902483.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-06-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
genetic information
genetic code
data protecion act
GDPR
informacja genetyczna
kod genetyczny
ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych
RODO
Opis:
Any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person is considered personal data, and as such, is protected by data protection laws. There are, however, a few specific categories of personal data related to the intimate sphere of life, the processing of which is, in principle, prohibited, unless one of several exceptions occurs. Although, early data protection regulations distinguished the state of health as specific category of data, genetic data were not treated as such. Therefore, in the light of Convention 108 (adopted in 1981) and Directive 1995/46, genetic data were treated as “ordinary” personal data. The Polish Data Protection Act from 1997 went further than the Directive 95/46 and listed “genetic code” among specific categories of data. However, the term “genetic code” was not defined in the Act and in practice caused a lot interpretation problems. The General Data Protection Regulation, adopted in 2016 and replacing national laws, including Polish data Protection Act, enumerates genetic data among specific categories of data. In the light of the GDPR “genetic data” means personal data relating to the inherited or acquired genetic characteristics of a natural person which give unique information about the physiology or the health of that natural person and which result, in particular, from an analysis of a biological sample from the natural person in question.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 73; 85-103
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Conditions for the Admissibility of Scienti C Research in Biomedicine Biobanking: A Challenge in Times of Big Data
Autorzy:
Dorota, Krekora-Zając,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902562.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-06-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
biobanks
donors
consent
biomedical research
information
human biological sample
personal data
GDPR
biobanki
dawcy
zgoda
badania biomedyczne
informacje
ludzka próbka biologiczna
dane osobowe
RODO
Opis:
The subject of the article is the analysis of the rights of donors donating their biological samples to biobanks in the 21st century. Issues regarding donor rights have been analyzed since the 1980s, however, changing times, creating Big Data databases as well as evolving legal awareness of donors meant that today the role of donors in the biobanking process should be perceived differently. Donors become active subjects of scientific research which is connected with the need to answer questions about the obligations to inform them about the results of scientific research conducted on their samples or incidental findings. Likewise, the combination of data registers and the creation of Big Data basis require the re-thinking of terms such as the protection of personal data of donors or the anonymisation of their data. These issues are imposed by negligence or complete lack of legal regulation of the biobanking, which makes the legal protection of the rights of donors dependent on the will of a particular biobank. All these phenomena result in the necessity of new approaches to the rights of donors and their inclusion in the future legal regulation.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 73; 57-71
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Facebook enforcement “saga”: How to enforce competition, consumer, and data protection laws in the digital economy
Autorzy:
Małobęcka, Iga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/47261321.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-05-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
digital economy
personal data
data protection
antitrust enforcement
consumer protection
GDPR
gospodarka cyfrowa
dane osobowe
ochrona danych osobowych
egzekwowanie prawa konkurencji
ochrona konsumentów
RODO
Opis:
The digital economy has brought new challenges to the enforcement of consumer, competition, and data protection laws as certain market practices (in particular, data practices) can simultaneously infringe all these three areas of law. However, the interdependence between consumer, competition, and data protection laws in the digital economy has so far been rarely reflected in their enforcement by national agencies. As evidenced by the Facebook enforcement “saga”, uncoordinated enforcement efforts by competition, consumer, and data protection agencies, which act in silos and focus only on national perspective, pose a threat to the effective protection of consumer welfare and data subject (consumer) rights in the EU. Therefore, it is proposed to introduce cooperation mechanisms between different agencies, both at the EU and national level, in cases involving practices that may potentially infringe all three areas of law and present a risk to sustainable development of the digital economy. It is argued that only a coordinated, cross-institutional, and multi-disciplinary enforcement can provide an effective response to such practices applied by digital giants, such as Facebook, Google, Amazon or Apple, and ensure that consumer welfare and data subject (consumer) rights are not compromised.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2021, 89; 189-215
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór kompetencyjny Ministra Cyfryzacji oraz Prezesa Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych na podstawie art. 33 Prawa przedsiębiorców
Autorzy:
M, Kaczyńska-Kral, Agata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902871.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-02
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
legal clarification
competency dispute
ministry of digitization
gdpr
president of the office of personal data protection
objaśnienie prawne
spór kompetencyjny
Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji
r.o.d.o.
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych
Opis:
On the basis of the Polish law of entrepreneurs, a competency dispute arose between the Minister of Digitization and the President of the Office of Personal Data Protection. Both authorities deem it appropriate to interpret GDPR. The Minister of Digitization believes that he is authorized because of the rights to create a policy in the field of personal data protection. The President of the Office for Personal Data Protection believes that he is authorized as a supervisory body according to GDRP and the competent authority for the protection of personal data. Due to the fact that the GDPR is an act of a higher rank than the Polish law, it is necessary to admit to the supervisory body that it is the only person entitled to a binding interpretation of GDPR regulations.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 77; 59-67
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies