Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "President" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
Order for the continuation of economic activity by an energy company in the social interest
Autorzy:
Wolska, Hanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899364.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-09-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
energy company
social interest
President of the Energy Regulatory Office
Opis:
Article 40 of the Energy Law Act of 10 April 1997 provides for the possibility for the President of the Energy Regulatory Office to order the continuation of economic activity by an energy company despite the expiry of a license. This is a special regulation related to the need to ensure the continuity of supplies and protection of recipients of energy services when required by social interest. Therefore, this regulation provides for an exception to the principle of the freedom to undertake, perform, and terminate economic activity. The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the fact that the necessity to ensure the provision of energy services in a continuous manner means that the state imposes an obligation on energy companies to continue economic activity, at the same time not guaranteeing the entrepreneurs sufficient compensation in the form of appropriate remuneration for continuing the economic activity. Pursuant to the provisions of the Energy Law Act of 10 April 1997, an energy company is only entitled to loss coverage and only in the amount limited to the justified costs of the ordered activity.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2023, 98; 199-208
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór o Trybunał Konstytucyjny – geneza i istota problemu, skutki, scenariusze na przyszłość
Autorzy:
Janusz, Roszkiewicz,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903076.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-03
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
Constitutional Tribunal
judge
President of CT
President of the Republic of Poland
Sejm of the Republic of Poland
Trybunał Konstytucyjny
sędzia
Prezes TK
Prezydent Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Opis:
The dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal is primarily of a personal nature and concerns two issues: 1) the legality of choosing three people for the position of judge of the Constitutional Tribunal: Mariusz Muszyński, Jaroslaw Wyrembak and Justyn Piskorski; 2) the legality of the appointment of the judge of the Tribunal Julia Przyłębska to the post of the President of the Constitutional Tribunal. This article consists of a descriptive part summarizing the basic facts and arguments brought up by both parties to the dispute in the legal discussion, and a prognosis presenting four alternative scenarios for ending the dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal in 2019–2024 or later.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 77; 119-138
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Status of the President of the Office of Electronic Communications as a mediator in the field of telecommunications services
Autorzy:
Wolska, Hanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899546.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024-04-14
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
mediation
President of the Office of Electronic Communications
consumer
provision of publicly available telecommunications services
Opis:
The subject of this paper is an analysis of the status of the role of the President of the Office of Electronic Communications in the area of mediation concerning telecommunications services. The paper includes a legal analysis relating to the subject and object aspect of mediation in the area of telecommunications services. It also presents the procedure and the type of actions undertaken by the President of the Office of Electronic Communications in terms of disputes covered by its jurisdiction as a mediator. The article also answers the question whether the juxtaposition of the role of a regulator and a mediator in one body can lead to an abuse of one of these positions.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2023, 101; 499-506
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przesłanka interesu publicznego w działaniach Prezesa URE i Prezesa UOKiK na rynku energetycznym
Autorzy:
Elżanowski, Filip
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/47389519.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
public interest
the President of Energy Regulatory Office
the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection
regulatory authority
energy market
regulatory instruments
interes publiczny
Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów
organ regulacyjny
rynek energii
instrumenty regulacyjne
Opis:
Every action of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection [PL: Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów] must be taken in the public interest – the primary purpose of the antimonopoly regulation is to protect the business of entrepreneurs and consumers in the public interest. The President of the Energy Regulatory Office [PL: Urząd Regulacji Energetyki] is also governed by public interest activities. Under the applicable law, he is responsible for the development of competition, and one of his duties is to counteract the adverse effects of natural monopolies and balance the business of energy companies and fuel and energy consumers. In the Act on competition and consumer protection [PL: ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów], the notion of public interest is defined very generally. However, the Act on Energy Law [PL: ustawa – Prawo energetyczne] precisely specifies which elements shall be taken into account by the President of the Energy Regulatory Office each time when making a decision. A number of his activities aim to balance the business of energy security with the protection of energy companies’ business and consumers’ business, including issuing decisions on approval of tariffs. The President of the Energy Regulatory Office ensures the implementation of the public interest in this respect, and such interest cannot be understood differently by another regulatory authority under another act. Otherwise, a violation of the axiological coherence of the legal system occurs. In this particular context (in terms of the implementation of the public interest), priority should be given to the utility regulatory authority (the President of ERO) and not to the antimonopoly authority. However, in this case, we are not dealing with a contradiction of the wording of the provisions but with a potential contradiction in terms of the understanding and application of the public interest premise. Therefore, the provisions of utility acts constitute a lex specialis in this respect to the Act on competition and consumer protection – taking into account this particular approach, such contradiction does not occur. Consequently, it should be concluded that if a given action of the President of ERO (an administrative decision issuance) implemented the public interest by the Act (and was maintained in legal transactions, was not repealed, etc.), it thus excludes the possibility of taking action by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection which was based on the need to protect this public interest.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2021, 88; 78-107
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Comparative Analysis of the Systems of Government of the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Armenia
Autorzy:
Hrayr, Tovmasyan,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902443.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
semi-presidential form of government
presidential form of government
parliamentary form of government
President of the Republic
Parliament
Government
dual accountability of government
Opis:
The article discusses the system of government in the Republic of Poland and Republic of Armenia, showing the main similarities and differences between them.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2016, 68; 393-402
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zwolnienie z konstytucyjnego wymogu kontrasygnaty – rozważania na tle niekontrasygnowanych obwieszczeń Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej o wolnych stanowiskach sędziego w Sądzie Najwyższym i Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Autorzy:
Olga, Kazalska,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902506.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-01-17
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
President of the Republic of Poland
Supreme Court
countersignature
privilege
announcement
official act
Prezydent Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Sąd Najwyższy
kontrasygnata
prerogatywa
obwieszczenie
akt urzędowy
Opis:
On June 29, 2018 in Dziennik Urzędowy “Monitor Polski” (the Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland) were published two announcements by the President of the Republic of Poland – from May 24, 2018, on the vacant positions of the judges in the Supreme Court and from May 28, 2018 on the vacant positions of the judge in the Supreme Administrative Court. The obligation to announce the number of vacant judges’ positions is a result of changes in the structure of the Supreme Court introduced by the new law of 8 December 2017 and the obligation to apply these provisions to the judges of the Supreme Administrative Court. The controversy is aroused by the fact that the published announcements were not countersigned – although this competence is not included in the catalog of presidential prerogatives, exempted from the obligation of co-signing by the Prime Minister. The analysis of the constitutional shape of the countersignature and the practice of using by the President of his competences will allow to answer the question whether the President’s announcements require for their validity the signature of the Prime Minister’s or are they exempt from this requirement. In the light of the doctrinal reflections, the recognition of the announcement of the President of the Republic of Poland on vacant judicial positions in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court may be considered as a derivative or analogous competence to the presidential prerogative of appointing judges. However, this stands in contradiction with the Constitutional Tribunal jurisprudence, which excludes the possibility of a broad interpretation of the constitutional catalog of prerogatives. Nevertheless, due to the informative, non-normative character of the announcements of the President, the issue of qualifying them to the catalog of official acts, for which the countersignature is required, raises reasonable doubts.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 76; 218-243
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Spór kompetencyjny Ministra Cyfryzacji oraz Prezesa Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych na podstawie art. 33 Prawa przedsiębiorców
Autorzy:
M, Kaczyńska-Kral, Agata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902871.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-05-02
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
legal clarification
competency dispute
ministry of digitization
gdpr
president of the office of personal data protection
objaśnienie prawne
spór kompetencyjny
Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji
r.o.d.o.
Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Danych Osobowych
Opis:
On the basis of the Polish law of entrepreneurs, a competency dispute arose between the Minister of Digitization and the President of the Office of Personal Data Protection. Both authorities deem it appropriate to interpret GDPR. The Minister of Digitization believes that he is authorized because of the rights to create a policy in the field of personal data protection. The President of the Office for Personal Data Protection believes that he is authorized as a supervisory body according to GDRP and the competent authority for the protection of personal data. Due to the fact that the GDPR is an act of a higher rank than the Polish law, it is necessary to admit to the supervisory body that it is the only person entitled to a binding interpretation of GDPR regulations.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2018, 77; 59-67
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies