Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Najwyższy" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10
    Tytuł:
    Legal and Historical Perspective on Public Character of Cassation Complaint in Polish Civil Procedure
    Autorzy:
    Edyta, Gapska,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902695.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    cassation
    cassation complaint
    reform
    Supreme Court
    kasacja
    skarga kasacyjna
    reforma
    Sąd Najwyższy
    Opis:
    The text offers an overview of the evolution of cassation in Poland and its historical background from the 19th century until the present time. The author argues that consistently conducted transformation of the Polish cassation system has changed the perception of cassation which was widely spread after the political transformation of 1989. She points out that such elements as: the procedure of preliminary selection of cases, absolute compulsory representation by an attorney or legal advisor, and the exclusive use of cassation grounds indicated in the Code of Civil Procedure exert an impact on the accessibility of a cassation complaint. She demonstrates a far-fetching evolution of this appellate measure over the years, considering the fact the beginning of its function was quite the opposite.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 267-301
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Common Law Perspective on the Supreme Court and its Functions
    Autorzy:
    Richard, Marcus,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902705.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-26
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Supreme Court
    civil law system
    common law system
    Sąd Najwyższy
    system kontynentalny
    system common law
    Opis:
    The text presents different attributes of the Supreme Court in common law and civil law systems. The author claims that the question of design and function of a supreme court, while important, is no more significant than the issue of its institutional status and evolution, i.e. something one could refer to as “legal culture”. Neither the “common law camp”, nor the “civil law camp” turns out to be monolithic in this regard. The distinctive history of the US Supreme Court is presented through the perspective of its statutory and procedural supremacy, as well as its power of constitutional adjudication. The author indicates that the supremacy of the US Supreme Court depends on many factors. Arguably, the most important attribute of the US Supreme Court’s supremacy is linked with the latitude offered to judges in common law system to “make law”, which stands in contrast to a limited judicial function in many civil law countries. The author argues that being a court in a common law system carries with it much broader authority. A supreme court in such a system is, as a result, much more supreme. The author concludes his comparative remarks by saying that it is not possible to proclaim the superiority of one specific system because there are too many variables that come into play with regard to respective nations.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 15-43
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Aggressive Judicial Review, Political Ideology, and the Rule of Law
    Autorzy:
    J, Segall, Eric
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902971.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-05-04
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Constitutional Law
    Constitutional Interpretation
    Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych
    prawo konstytucyjne
    interpretacja konstytucji
    Opis:
    For over one-hundred and fifty years, the United States Supreme Court has been the most powerful judicial body in the world with life-tenured judges consistently invalidating state and federal laws without clear support in constitutional text or history. This paper focuses on what should be the appropriate role of life-tenured, unelected federal judges in the American system of separation of powers. The tension is between wanting judges to enforce the supreme law of the Constitution while at the same time keeping judges within their assigned roles of enforcing not making the law. Much of constitutional scholarship in the United States is devoted to resolving this tension. This article argues that the Court should take a set back and defer more to elected leaders and voters. Although structural reform might help, most needed changes would require a constitutional amendment and are therefore unlikely to occur. The Justices should take it upon themselves to act with more humility and modesty and only overturn laws where there is strong evidence of clear constitutional error.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 79; 68-77
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    La Cour Suprême et ses fonctions dans le système judiciaire polonaise
    Autorzy:
    Walerian, Sanetra,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902421.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Supreme Court
    functions of the Supreme Court
    cassation court
    Sąd Najwyższy
    funkcje Sądu Najwyższego
    sąd kasacyjny
    Opis:
    The author asserts that the organization of judicial system in each country is a result of a long evolution triggered by political, economic, social and cultural developments. The Polish Supreme Court was created in 1917, but its current shape is an outcome of changes initiated in 1990s, most notably the entrance into force of the new Polish Constitution in 1997. The author analyses the notion of judicial power by juxtaposing a functional approach and a structural approach. Next, he remarks that the most important function of the Polish Supreme Court is to ensure the uniformity of jurisprudence by examining cassation complaints. Among other functions of the Supreme Court, the author enumerated examination of electoral protests, declaring the validity of elections of executive and legislative authorities, stating the validity of national referendums. The author emphasized that some specific duties of the Supreme Court are stipulated not only in the Constitution, but also in other legal acts. By presenting a wide range of attributes bestowed upon the Supreme Court, the author also invoked the duty of examining complaints against the excessive length of the proceedings, complaints for declaring a final judgment contrary to law, the appellate measures in disciplinary cases involving judges, prosecutors and legal advisors as well as appellate measures against the decisions of the National Judiciary Council. In addition to it, the author hinted at the Supreme Court’s obligation to control acts adopted by the authorities of self-governing bodies of attorneys, notaries, legal advisors and bailiffs. The author comes to the conclusion that the Supreme Court in Poland cannot be described as a typical cassation court. Although its principle role is to examine cassation complaints with a view to ensure uniformity of jurisprudence and its conformity with law, it also fulfils many other functions that are of great significance for the legal order in Poland.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 103-122
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Access to the Supreme Court – the English Approach
    Autorzy:
    John, Sorabji,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902762.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    The United Kingdom Supreme Court
    permission to appeal
    formal requirements
    Sąd Najwyższy Zjednoczonego Królestwa
    pozwolenie na zaskarżenie orzeczenia
    wymagania formalne
    Opis:
    The United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) is a relatively new supreme court, as it started to sit as recently as 2009. It is the statutory successor to the House of Lords’ judicial powers. The text sets out the following issues: the court’s jurisdiction, standing, permission to appeal requirements, substantive nature of appeals, tied decisions and reopening of appeals. Next, the author proceeds to examine the nature of the remedies avaible to it, and any restrictions that apply to them. The text demonstrates the UKSC’s wide-ranging appellate jurisdiction, which enables it to exercise the full range of powers of the courts from which appeals are made it. However, in the majority of cases, access to the UKSC is limited due to the Court’s focus on legal questions of general public importance. As a result of it, the UKSC deals with a small number of cases on an annual basis. Although the Court is not supposed to carry out a judicial review of legislative action, the author hints at a nascent movement towards establishing a US-style power to strike down legislation.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 152-171
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Civil Law Perespective on the Supreme Court and its Functions
    Autorzy:
    Aleš, Galič,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902896.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-26
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Supreme Court
    public interest
    private interest
    functions of the Supreme Court
    Sąd Najwyższy
    interes publiczny
    interes prywatny
    funkcje Sądu Najwyższego
    Opis:
    The text presents the issue of the Supreme Court’s functions from the perspective of civil law countries. The author argues that the division into cassation, revision and appeal is not an adequate point of reference enabling to define those functions. The author asserts that the most important criterion is whether the Supreme Court acts overwhelmingly in public or private interest. The assessment of that criterion should be made on the basis of the methods of selection of cases by the Supreme Court. What is essential is whether the selection is based on public aims or whether it simply aims at solving a given case accurately. It may be argued that as a result of reforms introduced in the last few years, the majorityof civil law countries have focusedon the implementation of the public rather than private functions. The author concludes that the public function of supreme courts is of a completely different significance than in the times of socialism. The public interest is combined with private interest as it refers to the situation of parties – not parties to the specific proceedings, but all parties which are going to engage in litigation in the future.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 44-86
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zwolnienie z konstytucyjnego wymogu kontrasygnaty – rozważania na tle niekontrasygnowanych obwieszczeń Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej o wolnych stanowiskach sędziego w Sądzie Najwyższym i Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
    Autorzy:
    Olga, Kazalska,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902506.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-01-17
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    President of the Republic of Poland
    Supreme Court
    countersignature
    privilege
    announcement
    official act
    Prezydent Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
    Sąd Najwyższy
    kontrasygnata
    prerogatywa
    obwieszczenie
    akt urzędowy
    Opis:
    On June 29, 2018 in Dziennik Urzędowy “Monitor Polski” (the Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland) were published two announcements by the President of the Republic of Poland – from May 24, 2018, on the vacant positions of the judges in the Supreme Court and from May 28, 2018 on the vacant positions of the judge in the Supreme Administrative Court. The obligation to announce the number of vacant judges’ positions is a result of changes in the structure of the Supreme Court introduced by the new law of 8 December 2017 and the obligation to apply these provisions to the judges of the Supreme Administrative Court. The controversy is aroused by the fact that the published announcements were not countersigned – although this competence is not included in the catalog of presidential prerogatives, exempted from the obligation of co-signing by the Prime Minister. The analysis of the constitutional shape of the countersignature and the practice of using by the President of his competences will allow to answer the question whether the President’s announcements require for their validity the signature of the Prime Minister’s or are they exempt from this requirement. In the light of the doctrinal reflections, the recognition of the announcement of the President of the Republic of Poland on vacant judicial positions in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court may be considered as a derivative or analogous competence to the presidential prerogative of appointing judges. However, this stands in contradiction with the Constitutional Tribunal jurisprudence, which excludes the possibility of a broad interpretation of the constitutional catalog of prerogatives. Nevertheless, due to the informative, non-normative character of the announcements of the President, the issue of qualifying them to the catalog of official acts, for which the countersignature is required, raises reasonable doubts.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2018, 76; 218-243
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Supreme Courts in the 21st Century: should organisation follow the function?
    Autorzy:
    Alan, Uzelac,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902979.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Supreme Court
    organisation of the Supreme Court
    work efficiency in the Supreme Court
    Sąd Najwyższy
    organizacja Sądu Najwyższego
    efektywność pracy w Sądzie Najwyższym
    Opis:
    The text discusses different aspects connected with organisation of supreme courts. It argues that the focus should be shifted to the “how” question. If the supreme courts aspire to fulfil certain special functions, a necessary precondition towards fulfilling this goal entails appropriate organisational structures, means and personnel. The organisation, framework and methods of work of a supreme court should reflect the functions that it is supposed to serve. Although most supreme courts have staff, departments and offices that are entrusted with legal research and analysis, the rise in importance of international jurisprudence is putting on the agenda the need for restructuring and reinforcing the existing departments. The author claims that supreme courts are becoming less and less self-centred in their adjudication, which requires legal research of international and comparative law. The text also deals with other aspects of supreme courts’ organisation. For instance, it shifts focus towards the relation between the number of judges in a supreme court and its impact on the uniformity of jurisprudence. It also emphasises the need to further examine the relation between the number of judges per capita and the efficiency of the court’s work.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 125-139
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Supreme People’s Court of China in the Process of Judicial Reform
    Autorzy:
    Baosheng, Zhang,
    Yin, Li,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/903025.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-10-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Supreme People’s Court of China
    judicial reform
    human rights
    evidence rule system
    Najwyższy Sąd Ludowy
    reforma sądowa
    prawa człowieka
    system dowodów
    Opis:
    The text presents judicial reforms of the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC). The author argues that during a twenty-year period, the role of the SPC has underwent two major transitions. Firstly, its role of a dispute solver evolved into a designer and a leading voice of the judicial system in China. Secondly, it shifted its position from a passive implementer of laws and policies into an active public policy maker. The text also offers an insight into the SPC’s enhancement of human rights protection, efforts to establish the evidence rule system, as well as its role in promoting judicial transparency.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 81; 320-332
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Case Law in Ukraine: On the Issues of Its Introduction and Development in the Activity of Supreme Court
    Autorzy:
    Nazarii, Stetsyk,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902498.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-03-11
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    case law
    precedent
    judicial practise
    supreme court of Ukraine
    proceedings
    unification of court practice
    judicial reform in Ukraine
    orzecznictwo
    precedens
    praktyka sądowa
    Sąd Najwyższy Ukrainy
    postępowanie
    ujednolicenie praktyki sądowej
    reforma sądowa na Ukrainie
    Opis:
    The article covers the doctrinal issues of judicial precedent and case law in the legal doctrine, substantiates the need for formalization and official recognition of the actual role of the decisions of the supreme courts in similar cases. Traditional doctrinal delimitation and contrasting case law and judicial practice leads to refuse of taking into account the positive experience of the functioning of case law in common law countries. Taking into account such experience would help to satisfy the demands of the court practice in raising the significance of the decisions of the supreme courts in similar cases. In Ukraine, as in many post-Soviet countries, there is a tendency to refuse explanations of legislation on the basis of summarizing of court practice, and at the same time formalization and official recognition of the bindiness and normativity of decisions of the supreme courts in specific cases. In this regard, the peculiarities of the introducing and development of the case law of the Supreme Court in Ukraine at various stages are analyzed. Also highlighted their positive and negative aspects.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2019, 82; 274-293
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies