Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Philosophy of technology" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Cztery koncepcje relacji człowiek–technika
Four concepts of the Human – technology relationship
Autorzy:
Łach, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2057137.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Philosophy of technology
technological determinism
Instrumentalism
STS
constructivism
Andrew Feenberg
Opis:
There have been two trends in the study of technology. On the one hand, critics of technology have emphasised the threats stemming from the development and use of advanced machines and devices, while on the other hand, there has been admiration for the successes brought by progress. The article presents an attempt to put this complex issue in order. Based on the analysis formulated by Andrew Feenberg, the text discusses four concepts of technology. The first of them is technical determinism, according to which technology in its development is independent of circumstances external to it. The second is substantive theory, in which technology is seen as an autonomous, independent force that dominates and subordinates everything. The third position is instrumentalism, which considers technique as a neutral tool, while moral evaluation can only concern whether it has been used well or badly. The last approach is constructivism, according to which technology is shaped by the influence of various interest groups.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2022, 11, 2; 325-345
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On the Relation Between Human and Technology
Autorzy:
Lizut, Rafał A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507402.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-03-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
man
technology
aim
function
morality
value
intentionality
artifact
Krąpiec
Lublin School of Philosophy
Opis:
According to the author, we live in the world which requires us to better understand the relationship between humans and technology, and especially technological artifacts. The author claims that this relationship, at least partially, can be explained in the framework of philosophy cultivated by the Lublin School of Philosophy represented by Mieczysław A. Krąpiec and his concepts of two intentionalites. However, in order to do justice to the human–artifact relationship two concepts of intentionality as elaborated by Krąpiec seem to be insufficient. The author then proposes to supplement Krąpiec’s concepts of the first intentionality present in the maker’s design and the second intentionality present in the artifact as an embodiment of that design with a concept of the third intentionality which is the inventive contribution of a user.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 1; 95-108
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies