Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "polis" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Greek and Roman Roots of European Civilisation
Autorzy:
Daszkiewicz, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507256.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-09-30
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Europe
ancient Greece
ancient Rome
civilisation
Western Civilisation
culture
polis
Roman law
Opis:
European countries share certain features, roots and, to a large extent, history. In the present article attention is paid to the Greek and Roman influence on European civilisation, or “Western Civilisation.” To this day Europeans refer to broadly understood models of ancient culture contained in the concept of polis as a community of equal citizens, in promoting representative bodies, appreciation of elements of merchant culture, rationality and emancipation, the concept of Roman Law that together represent the signa specifica of the Western civilisation. If one adds to this the contribution of Christianity and barbarian tribes, one may reconstruct an adequate representation of the “roots of Europe.”
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2017, 6, 3; 381-404
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The State, Law, Religion, and Justice in Cicero’s The Republic and The Laws: An Aristotelian-Thomistic Interpretation
Autorzy:
Morgan, Jason
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507689.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-08-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Cicero
natural law
Thomas Aquinas
Roman philosophy
statecraft
polis
Aristotle
religion
justice
Opis:
The writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero are often referred to by natural law theorists. But how do various points of Cicero’s philosophy of law—and of religion, justice, and the state—compare with similar themes from Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas? In this paper, I suggest a Thomistic-Aristotelian reading of Cicero as a way to contextualize and supplement the Roman philosopher’s work with more robust insights from Aristotle and St. Thomas, and especially from Aristotle as interpreted by St. Thomas in the later light of the Incarnation. I also show that Cicero’s natural law philosophy is inconsistent when taken on its own terms. Therefore, Cicero’s natural law philosophy—as well as his philosophy of religion, justice, and the state—should be subjected to a more critical examination by natural law scholars today.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2019, 8, 3; 645-680
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metaphysics and Evolution: Response to Critics
Autorzy:
Polis, Dennis
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2057089.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-20
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
Aristotelianism
Thomism
evolution
substance-accident distinction
epistemology
projective realism
nominalism
relativism
intentional existence
laws of nature
species problem
intelligent design
problem of universals
exemplar ideas
creationism
moderate realism
teleology
abstraction
Opis:
I respond to Michał Chaberek’s and Robert A. Delfino’s criticisms of my argument that evolution is compatible with Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics. Biological species, as secondary substances, are beings of reason founded in the natures of their instances. They are traceable to God’s creative intent, but not to universal exemplars. Aquinas teaches that concepts are derived from sensible accidents. Thus, evolution’s directed variation of such accidents will eventually require new species concepts. This accords with projective realism, which allows diverse, well-founded concepts based on the mul-tiple perspectives and conceptual spaces of knowing subjects. Charges that this is nom-inalism, not moderate realism, are rebutted; however, it is relativism because knowledge is a subject-object relation. Other metaphysical issues are considered. Chaberek’s thesis that species cannot evolve naturally fails because he: (1) reifies the species con-cept, (2) misrepresents the motivation, structure and conclusions of evolution, (3) con-fuses Aristotle’s four causes and (4) limits God’s creative omnipotence. Finally, Cha-berek is out of step with contemporary theology.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2021, 10, 4; 847-891
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies