Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Jasiecki" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Dysfunkcjonalny charakter systemu reprezentacji interesów w Unii Europejskiej
The Dysfunctional Nature of the Representation of Interests in the European Union
Autorzy:
Jasiecki, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/558137.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
Global Crisis of Liberal Democracy
System of Representing Interests in the EU
Undemocratic Liberalism
Illiberal Democracy
CEE Countries
Opis:
The theory of representation is an essential element of the social contract that legitimizes the state in democratic societies. In the European Union, representations of interests play a similar role to the one visible in other democratic systems. They are one of the main political actors in the EU, along with the governments of the Member States, EU institutions, political parties, national administration and voters. The global crisis of capitalism radically changed the context of policy, undermined systemic rules and shifted the standards of the public sphere. On the wave of criticism of the economy and neoliberal elites, as well as the inefficiency of the democratic system, the pathologies of representative politics are also rejected. New populist parties and their authoritarian leaders are rooted in social protests that marginalize the role of intermediary organizations. This kind of policy also challenges current EU rules. The significant role of radical parties is partly due to the fact that the complexity of decisionmaking processes in the Union that strengthens the influence of well-organized interest groups, which is beneficial to strong actors in the public sphere (political elites, some industries and transnational corporations). As a result, the interest group policy has become, to a large extent, a synonym of “undemocratic liberalism” against which there are advocates of “illiberal democracy”, particularly infl uential in Central and Eastern Europe. After a long period of communist rule, the CEE countries are distinguished by a weak civil society and limited awareness of the role of representing interests at both national and EU level. Policies shaped in such circumstances have often proven to be closer to new forms of “post-national democracy” in the CEE rather than to traditional national institutions, and this state of matters earns criticism of populist and conservative parties.
Źródło:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2018, 3; 25-50
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola i znaczenie współpracy gospodarczej państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej w Unii Europejskiej od 2015 roku
The Role and Importance of Economic Cooperation of the Visegrad Group Countries in the European Union Since 2015
Autorzy:
Jasiecki, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1038446.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
European Union;
Visegrad Group;
Economic Cooperation;
Structural Limitations;
Opis:
The aim of the article is to describe the genesis, role, significance, conditions and effects of economic cooperation of the Visegrad Group countries in the European Union, with particular emphasis on their development after 2015. It presents the distinguishing features and specificity of the Group’s cooperation before accession to NATO and the EU in the context of the situation of Central Europe and other European post-communist countries, as well as the most important aspects of the political and economic potential of the V4 countries against the background of the EU and selected member states. Various aspects of their economic cooperation in the region are discussed, as well as the structural limitations of the role of the Visegrad Group countries in the EU and related controversy. The final part contains conclusions relating to the Group’s activities with regard to the main axes of political and economic divisions in the EU, with particular emphasis placed on economic dimensions.
Źródło:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs; 2020, 24, 3; 183-205
1428-149X
2719-3780
Pojawia się w:
Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies