Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "literature history" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
Tytuł:
Brunon Schulz’s ‘Spring’: History and myth
„Wiosna” Brunona Schulza: historia i mit
Autorzy:
Bill, Stanley
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087211.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the 20th century
literature, history and myth
the Austro-Hungarian Empire
Bruno Schulz (1892–1942)
Joseph Roth (1894–1939)
Bruno Schulz
historia
polityka
imperium Habsburgów
mit
Joseph Roth
Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
Opis:
The most prevalent popular and critical images of Bruno Schulz present a Polish-Jewish writer and artist who turned away from politics and history in his creative work only to be devoured by the most violent political and historical forces in his life. This article attempts to reinsert Schulz’s writings into the social and political history of his day and age, focusing on an interpretation of his novella Spring (Wiosna). It argues that Schulz viewed the meaning and progression of history and politics in mythical terms. Accordingly, his stories contain ironic mythologizations of social, political and historical events. In Spring, Schulz captures, or rather constructs, the mythological essence of the disintegration of the Habsburg Empire, producing his own imaginative and contradictory commentary on the history of his native region during his own lifetime.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 6; 619-633
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Franciszek Karpiński – A hallmark sentimental writer?
Franciszek Karpiński – po czym poznać pamiętnikarza sentymentalnego?
Autorzy:
Zając, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089386.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
the history of Polish literature
the Enlightenment
prose
memoirs
sentimentalism
Franciszek Karpiński (1741–1825)
historia literatury polskiej
oświecenie
proza
pamiętnikarstwo
sentymentalizm
Franciszek Karpiński
Opis:
In the last phase of Franciszek Karpiński's life as a writer (the first quarter of the 19th century), he practically gave up poetry and concentrated instead on writing memoirs. This article tries to find out to what extent his autobiographical work, especially his Historia mego wieku i ludzi, z którymi żyłem [A History of My Century and the People with Whom I Lived], is influenced by an attitude characteristic of the sentimentalism of the previous century. As this analysis shows Karpiński's narrative exhibits both a sensitivity much indebted to Rousseau's autobiographical method and skilful shifts of tone, from satire and irony to various shades of melancholy. For sentimentalist aesthetic and poetics the continual manipulation of tone is a means of alerting the reader to the world's complexity. As in the novels of Lawrence Sterne, that complexity is experienced by way of careful observation of fragments of reality, defined by the subjectivity of the observer and the truth of his emotions.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2019, 5; 533-545
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Was Maurycy Mochnacki a messianist? A puzzling declaration of the author of “The Uprising of the Polish Nation in 1830–1831”
Czy Maurycy Mochnacki był mesjanistą? Wokół zagadki pewnej deklaracji autora „Powstania narodu polskiego”
Autorzy:
Kihara, Makiko
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089989.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
19th-century Polish literature and history
Polish Romanticism
the November Uprising (1830–1831)
Poland’s Great Emigration
radical politics
Polish messianism
discourse analysis
Maurycy Mochnacki (1803–1834)
Maurycy Mochnacki
romantyzm polski
mesjanizm
Wielka Emigracja
dyskurs
Opis:
In this article Maurycy Mochnacki’s martyrological and messianic declarations in the Preface to the Uprising of the Polish Nation in 1830–1831 are examined in the context of the martyrological discourse in the literature of the Great Emigration. Such an affi rmation may appear puzzling given Mochnacki’s rejection of martyrological interpretations of Poland’s history or messianic readings of his political philosophy, let alone his reputation of being radically opposed to Adam Mickiewicz’s idea of the sacrifi cial victimhood of the Polish nation. In this study the ideological and rhetorical aspects of their statements are compared and analysed. There can be little doubt that in the Preface Mochnacki’s phrasing is steeped in patriotic pathos which seems to be at odds with the tone of his other writings. This article claims that it was a tactical move on his part: he chose the familiar martyrological loci merely as a means to enlist the readers’ support for his own pragmatic programme of restoring Poland’s independence. A general conclusion to be drawn from this apparent inconsistency is that already at that stage (The Uprising was published in Paris in 1834) the logosphere of the Great Emigration had become so dominated by the martyrological discourse that Mochnacki could not afford to ignore it.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2018, 4; 355-371
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Retelling myths and legends in Slavic fantasy
Retelling mitów i legend w słowiańskiej fantastyce
Autorzy:
Mikinka, Aleksandra Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087701.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the 21st century
Poland's early history
Slavic fantasy
mythic history
Slavic mythology and religion
Young Adult Fiction
Maria Janion (1926–2020)
fantastyka
slavic books
retelling
rodzimowierstwo słowiańskie
mitologia słowiańska
Opis:
In 2006 Maria Janion wrote in The Uncanny Slavdom that “the new narrative of the humanities can tell the story of our culture differentlyˮ. Since that time such 'new narratives' have multiplied literally right in front of our eyes. While in the late 2000s the existence of a distinct Slavic fantasy subgenre was a matter of controversy, hotly debated by both authors and academics, today its presence and popularity is too conspicuous to leave any room for doubt. Each year the market is flooded with dozens of new Slavic fantasy books, which are then discussed in countless blogs, vlogs, discussion groups, and podcasts. The growth of interest in Slavic fantasy is phenomenal and seems to be part of a larger trend gaining ground not just in Poland but also in other Slavic nations. This gives rise to a number of questions which this article tries to address: What is Slavic fantasy? What place does it occupy in modern popular culture? What effects, beneficial or less so, will it have?
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 5; 545-558
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Translating memory: The reception of Miron Białoszewski’s „A Memoir of the Warsaw Uprising” in the English-speaking world
Tłumaczenie pamięci. Recepcja „Pamiętnika z powstania warszawskiego” w Ameryce Północnej
Autorzy:
Niżyńska, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087215.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the 20th century
autobiography
trauma
memoir and history
Miron Białoszewski (1922–1983)
Miron Białoszewski
poezja
literatura współczesna
pamiętnik
Opis:
While presenting a wide range of cultural, historical and political factors which have influen- ced the Polish and the American reception of Miron Białoszewski’s A Memoir of the Warsaw Uprising, this article tries to assess the role played in its reception abroad by the fact that the original text existed in several versions (censored and uncensored) and, on its way to print, got fitted out with multiple paratexts (introductions, prefaces and afterwords). Interestingly, there seems to be a connection between these fringe texts, the shaping of the translation as shown by choices made by the translators and editors, the evolving model of what is believed to be the right and proper handling of historical traumas, and the politics of remembrance in diverse historical settings and cultural imaginaries. An in-depth analysis of the details of translation and editorship opens up a series of broader questions about the status of a literary text functioning as evidence of traumatic historic events and the mechanisms of its reception by those directly affected (the family circle) and the people outside (with special attention being paid to the tension between the private and the public, and the normative versus the non-normative).
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 6; 635-651
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A transcultural mosaic: Stanisław Jaworski’s theory of the avant-garde
Transkulturowa mozaika. Teoria awangardy Stanisława Jaworskiego
Autorzy:
Kmiecik, Michalina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089551.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literary criticism of the late 20th century
theory of literature
modernism
history of the avant-garde
Stanisław Jaworski (1934–2018)
awangarda
Stanisław Jaworski
teoria tekstu
teoria literatury
Opis:
This article presents a profi le of Stanisław Jaworski as a literary scholar with a life-long involvement in avant-garde literature. He defi nes the avant-garde as a mosaic of diverse trends with no common aesthetic or ideological denominator and, at the same time, as a transcultural network of artists apparently unrelated artists. Focusing on his major studies (Foundations of the Avant-garde, Tadeusz Peiper: Writer and Theoretician, Between the Avant-garde and Surrealism, and The Avant-garde) the article reconstructs Jaworski’s insights and theoretical constructs in the context of contemporary network studies and reassesses his commitment to both history and theory of literature.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2018, 5; 497-504
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The relevance of history: Dramatic history poems by Stanisław Wyspiański and Tytus Czyżewski
Czym jest historia dla życia. Rapsody historyczne: Wyspiański i Czyżewski
Autorzy:
Sienkiewicz, Barbara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2088292.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the late 19th and Interwar period
philosophy of history
historical epic poems
emancipation and progress
modernity
the French Revolution
Stanisław Wyspiański (1869–1907)
Tytus Czyżewski (1880–1945)
Wyspiański
Czyżewski
rapsody
historia
rewolucja
teodycea
nowoczesność
Opis:
This article examines the analogies, and more specifically the historical 'theatre of the imagination', between Tytus Czyżewski's Robespierre/Rhapsody (1927) and Stanisław Wyspiańs-ki's poetic dramas Rhapsodies (Kazimierz the Great and Bolesław the Bold). Each of those poems foregrounds its principal historical character. Wyspiański's dramatic poems, commonly known as Rhapsodies, focus on Kazimierz the Great, Bolesław the Bold, and Piast. kings of pivotal significance in his vision of Poland's historical destiny. Twenty years later Tytus Czyżewski, an acclaimed avant-garde painter and poet, composed a poetic-essayistic salmagundi, in which he sought to render in a similarly elevated style and condensed dialogue the drama of the leaders of the French Revolution, Robespierre and Danton. While Robespierre has to face, apart from some common people, God, the Spirit and Judges that sit in judgment on him, the final section of Rhapsody evokes Juliusz Słowacki. A monologue, mimicking his lofty verse, establishes a metaphorical common thread in Polish history – from the days of mail-clad knights to the wretched everyday life in the trenches – set against a broad background of wars, destruction and the French Revolution. For Czyżewski the French Revolution was a ground-breaking event, the first act of a great historical process that ushered in the Modern Age with its ideas of progress, reason, freedom, social justice, the elimination of poverty. It continues to inspire mankind with the hope that even a most ambitious change is possible. For Wyspiański, on the other hand, the grand project of human emancipation does give rise to doubts whether a wholesale obliteration of the Old is justified and to questions about God, free will, theodicy and destiny, and the 'tyranny of reason'. The differences between the two philosophies of history – Wyspiański's, from the turn of the 19th century, and Czyżewski's, representative of the artistic and intellectual climate of the late 1920s – are no doubt profound, and yet, what both of them seem to share is a deep concern with the relevance of history for the present and for designing the future.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2019, 6; 613-630
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The agony of striving: A Profile of Jakub Frank in Andrzej Żuławski’s “Moliwda”
„Męka dociekania”. Obraz Jakuba Franka w „Moliwdzie” Andrzeja Żuławskiego
Autorzy:
Misztela, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089407.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the 20th century
historical essay
18-century sectarianism and modernity
Jewish Messianism
radical visions of history
Antoni Kossakowski „Moliwda”(1718–1786)
Jakub Frank (1726–1791)
Andrzej Żuławski (1940–2016)
„Moliwda”
Antoni Kossakowski (1718–1786)
frankizm
wiek XVIII
wiek XX
komunizm
tyran
Opis:
This article looks at a character of Jakub Frank, the 18th-century Jewish Messianic leader, in Andrzej Żuławski’s book of idiosyncratic essays Moliwda (published in 1994). Żuławski, a controversial fi lm-maker and writer, whose historic musings are usually focused on an individual who embodies the spirit of the age in this case turns his attention to Jakub Frank. Moliwda is typical of the early phase of Żuławski’s writing career characterized by a radically revisionist explorations of the Age of the Enlightenment in search for parallels with the modern age and his own life. Jakub Frank is presented as a trickster, religious charlatan, political fraudster and fateful ancestor of 20th-century tyrants, but at the same time as a rebel against the idea of God and history enshrined in the Judaic tradition. The article views Żuławski’s interpretation as an attempt to appropriate certain elements of the history of religion to create an authoritarian vision of modernity and its historical roots, based on mechanisms of self-aggrandizement, sexualization of power and subversion of all hierarchies.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2018, 5; 589-596
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies