Temat: przestrzeń społeczna - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Historyczne uwarunkowania działań biznesowych w Polsce z perspektywy koncepcji przestrzeni społecznej
Historical Conditions for Business Activities in Poland from the Perspective of the Social Space Concept
Autorzy:: Dymarczyk, Waldemar
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1831457.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020-06-29
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: przestrzeń społeczna, przedsiębiorczość, historia gospodarcza, socjologia przestrzeni
social space; entrepreneurship; economic history; sociology of space
Opis:: Działania aktorów życia społecznego odbywają się w określonych kontekstach czasowych i przestrzennych. To, do czego dążą, jakie mają cele i szanse ich realizacji zależy min. od określonego poziomu rozwoju infrastruktury, techniki i technologii, otoczenia instytucjonalnego czy obowiązującej ideologii. Tematem niniejszego artykułu są główne uwarunkowania rozwoju biznesu w Polsce, poczynając od czasów powojennych do dnia dzisiejszego. Nawiązując do koncepcji przestrzeni społecznej autor ukazuje przemiany środowiska rozumianego jako pewien zestaw założeń i determinantów rozwojowych i ich fizycznych emanacji, które na każdym etapie historycznym wpływały na wybór celów i charakter działań biznesowych. Ostatnią część artykułu stanowi refleksja nad możliwymi kierunkami rozwoju przestrzeni społecznej w Polsce.
The activities of social actors take place in specific temporal and spatial contexts. What are their goals and their chances of realization depend, inter alia, on the specific level of development of the infrastructure, technique and technology, institutional environment or preferred ideology. The subject of this article are the main conditions for the development of business in Poland, from the post-war period to the present day. Referring to the concept of social space, the author shows the transformations of the environment, understood as a set of assumptions and determinants of development and their physical emanations, which at every stage of history influenced the choice of goals and the nature of business activities. The final part of the article is a reflection on the possible directions of development of the social space in Poland.
Źródło:: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2019, 47, 3; 5-20
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: A. Giddensa teoria strukturacji a teoria konstruktywizmu strukturalnego P. Bourdieu
Autorzy:: Turowski, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1856472.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2005
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: podmiotowość
teoria strukturacji
teoria konstruktywizmu strukturalnego
pole
przestrzeń społeczna
habitus
teoria praktyki
subjectivity
structuration theory
theory of structural constructivism
field
social space
theory of practice
Opis:: The author makes a comparative analysis of the views in sociology of the dilemmas between agency and the social structure that shapes it (in Giddens’s formulation) and on the dilemma between objectivism and subjectivism in approaching reality (in P. Bordieu’s formulation). Both these theoreticians agree in recognizing these dilemmas-antinomies as merely apparent and false ones. Both Giddens and Bourdieu declare abandoning controversy on the „nature” of the individual and society in the form of the dichotomy: agency-structure, or the dilemma: objectivism-subjectivism, and making the investigations of social practices, that is of real social behaviors and agency, the subject of sociological studies. For study reasons they define the individual–man in a neutral way as an „acting subject”, „social actor”, and the social collective–social group, term as a „collective actor” and „group subject”. Analysis of social practices that are ordered in time and space made by Giddens shows that individuals-subjects undertake and reproduce routine and strategic actions and they are guided by p r a c t i c a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s, comprising both knowledge and control of their agency. They monitor their behavior. They (subjects) are characterized by selfreflexiveness (Giddens) or habitus as a set of dispositions inclining social actors to respond and act in a definite way in a given situation (Bourdieu). Hence they are characterized by self r e g u l a t i o n. The agency happens in a certain connection with the structure. The structure comprises a set of institutionalized rules–ways and significant codes of behavior as well as resources, the so-called allocation and authority resources (Giddens) with the help of which the agency is done. Hence agency as actions and structure as „the means” of agency constitute a duality, that is divided only analytically. Duality is the main thesis of the structuration theory formulated by Giddens. Structure in Bourdieu’s formulation is characterized by objectivity; it is interiorized by individuals and is subjectivized by individuals in the course of upbringing and being exposed in the biographical course of life, but then it is also subjected to externalization in the shape of reproduction of agencies, construing new or modified agencies, new forms of organizations, behavior patterns or professed values and recognized norms. These processes or „mechanism”: of subjectivization of objectivity and objectivization of in a way processed subjectivity are defined as „theory of structural constructivism. With a little different understandings of „structure” and in a little different ways both authors solve – as it appears – apparent dilemmas. To define super-individual social wholes in which individuals occur in social life Giddens introduces the concepts of social system and of society conceding the attribute of subjectiveness to them. On the other hand, Bourdieu rejects this definition and leaves the study of the network of relations – various kinds of relations occurring between individuals, that is the so-called interhuman spaces, and of the symbolic fields it consists of, that are various and differentiated spheres of actions, interests-values which individuals enter with an adequate „capital” and compete with one another in the „symbolic struggle” for their interests-values. Authority and subjectivity of an individual. Authority is the domination occurring between people in social life. The sources of authority lie in the differences in resources (of allocations and authority) that individuals or societies-states have at their disposal (Giddens). Authority has a s y m b o l i c character, it is conferred with the help of proper rituals and if it is in some way respected, it derives its validity from that fact; otherwise it is a symbolic violence. The state is a self-validating monopolist of symbolic violence (Bourdieu). In the synthetic conclusion both authors express the view that all structural conditions preserve and respect t h e s u b j e c t i v i t y o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l’s agency, since limiting some they liberate other agencies and make them possible (Gidden), and the habitus gives a possibility of different behaviors in immediate social situations and of recognizing and considering objective historical structural conditions in the activity of social subjects (Bourdieu).
Źródło:: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2005, 33, 1; 37-59
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Pomniki i obiekty architektoniczne jako symbole kształtujące tożsamość miejsca (przypadek Gdańska)
Monuments and Architectonic Objects as Symbols the Form Identity of the Place
Autorzy:: Załęcki, Jarosław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1856519.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2004
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:: socjologia miasta
miejsce
tożsamość miejsca
tożsamość społeczna
identyfikacja z miejscem (miastem)
przestrzeń miasta
przestrzeń znacząca
semiotyka przestrzeni miejskiej
centrum symboliczne miasta
Opis:: Gdańsk is a very interesting object of research. It is here that the process of making the Polish society subject-oriented started in 1980; it is here that originated the “Autumn of the Peoples in 1989”. This city has a many-aged tradition in which one may find Polish, Kashoubian, German, Hanzeatic, and Netherlandic manifestations of the creative spirit. The paper sought to show the semeiotic landscape of Gdańsk, therefore those elements, which consitute its differentia specifica. The symbols of the city are among the essential grounds upon which to form the character and identity of the city. In the light of the research, Gdańsk appears to be a city that is distinctly different from other Polish citites, and it is mainly its monuments and numerous historic places that join the impact of many cultures. The enormous symbolical force is concentrated in architecture and monuments and it enhances the sense of roots. It is owing to them that one can distinctly feel that the place is unique, feel its specific character and prestige.
Źródło:: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych; 2004, 32, 1; 187-204
0137-4176
Pojawia się w:: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "przestrzeń społeczna" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język