Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "God of faith" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Dlaczego sakramenty potrzebują wiary?
    Why Do Sacraments Need Faith?
    Autorzy:
    Głowacki, Zbigniew Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32062661.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    sakramenty
    wiara
    personalizm wiary
    historia zbawienia
    słowo Boże
    mistagogia
    sacraments
    faith
    personalism of faith
    history of salvation
    Word of God
    mystagogy
    Opis:
    Salvation given man by God is at the same time liberating him from sin and giving him a possibility to live a divine life. Man gains participation in it in faith and in sacraments. These two realities are connected with each other, which was noticed by the teaching of the Vatican Council II that treated them as two elements of the same salvation process. Defining the relations between them is a significant theological problem, as limiting participation in salvation to the sacrament only results in sacramentalism; and remaining with faith only — in fideism. The connection between faith and sacraments may be seen in their personalistic and historical-salutary character. Both faith and the sacrament involve the entire man, and have Mysterium Christi as their foundation. Their mutual relation is a complementary one. The sacrament needs faith to be fruitful for Christian life, and on the other hand, faith is expressed and consolidated in the sacramental way. The time in the history of the Church, when this relation was emphasized, was in the first centuries of Christianity. In a natural way faith demanded to be expressed in the sacrament, and the sacrament needed prior faith. Return to this proper relation between the sacrament and faith should happen in two ways. The first one is referring faith and the sacrament to God’s Word, which will give it a historical-salutary perspective. The second one is mystagogy that will allow treating the participation of the faithful one in the sacrament as his participation in the Mystery of Christ. Closer ties between the liturgy of sacraments and God’s Word, in connection with sacramental mystagogy may be a way to return to the primeval unity of faith and the sacrament.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Liturgiczno-Homiletyczne; 2011, 2; 43-54
    2082-8586
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Liturgiczno-Homiletyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Związek treści teologicznych formuł zawartych w „Credo” i euchologii Mszału rzymskiego 2002
    Connection of the Theological Formulas of “Creed” and the Euchology of the Roman Missal 2002
    Autorzy:
    Mocydlarz, Włodzimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32062795.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Tematy:
    Credo in unum Deum
    et... Ecclesiam
    wyznanie wiary
    lex credendi – lex orandi
    et... Ecclesiam w euchologii MR
    metahistoryczność i teandryzm Kościoła
    święty Kościół powszechny
    Missale Romanum
    belive in one God
    belive in one holy catholic and apostolic Church
    profession of faith
    et... Ecclesiam in Missal’s euchology
    metahistoricity and theandrism of the Church
    the holy Catholic Church
    Opis:
    We have tried to show in our research the connection formulas of faith in God and the Church in relation to the Mass euchology the sense in which the profession of faith in God (Credo in unum Deum) is, and what is not identical to an article of faith in the Church (et... Ecclesiam). The similarity of these articles of faith has analogous nature, but it is not identical, because where there are similarities, the differences are even bigger, particularly in relation to God. The belief that the Church is holy and universal (catholic), that is one and apostolic, is inseparable from faith into the Triune God. But when, in the Apostles’ Creed we profess faith in the Church (et... Ecclesiam), then we use here a different form than in the article regarding belief in God (Credo in... Deum), because God is the Creator, and the Church is His creation, because the goodness of God is the source of all the gifts which the Church enjoys. The difference in the meaning of the creed in unum Deum, and et... Ecclesiam resolved so clearly the Catechism of the Catholic Church (cf. 750). This is confirmed by the Pope Benedict XVI, and even those of the theologians who wrote before its release in 1992. Even meta-historicity and theandric reality of the Church in terms of Paul Evdokimov did not storm the structure of the economy of salvation, which was created and revealed to us by God in Jesus Christ and the Church after Pentecost. It provided us in the Church and through the Church (and its liturgy). According to Evdokimov, the mystery of the Church still comes from the creative act of God, and it remains creation. The decisions of the ancient doctrine of the Church and later on over the centuries, remain no doubt that the Apostolic Church is that only through the saving work of Christ the Lord, and their credibility derives from its permanent presence in the Church. However, on the other hand, we know that He identifies himself with the Church (with his brothers, with their followers), as it is seen in a very explicit way in the testimony of Acts, the risen Jesus in dialogue with Saul (cf. Acts 9:4), which has immediately understood that by persecuting the disciples (the Church), haunted by the one who blinded him with its splendor on the road to Damascus. Then, the converted Saul–Paul, develops profound doctrine of the Church as the Mystical Body of Christ. But never in a physical manner. He does not identify the Church and Christ. This can be noted especially in his letters to the local communities. For example a sinful Church in Corinth (1 Cor 5), which Paul had to rebuke. Besides, a very eloquent text, talking about rectifying the identified shortcomings sufferings of Christ (Col 1:24). We can clearly see that it is a body which is the Church, its good that is done by the suffering endured in the flesh by Paul himself for the name of Jesus. So neither Paul nor the Church is presented as a perfect one. A similar picture of the Church emerges from Missal’s euchology, which we discussed on selected examples of the collects and prefaces, which in turn confirm and demonstrate the true meaning of the Credo in unum Deum, and et... Ecclesiam. Both the differences and similarities within the meaning of these syntagmata don’t remain any doubt that the interpretation of these articles of faith in the Catechism of the Catholic Church is consistent with that what emerges from the typical edition of the latest Roman Missal. Our conclusions are based not only on the Magisterium of the Church, but also in its praxis, which has always had a profession of faith (lex credendi) and accounted for the liturgical space of the expression (lex orandi). We have to say that nowhere in the texts of the Mass euchology such a use occurs a syntagma et... Ecclesiam (in acc.), which would suggest that we believe in the Church in the same sense as in unum Deum. The theological content of the prayers clearly shows an understanding of this syntagma of the Church, which was articulated by the Catechism (CCC 750) and the Magisterium of the Church, along with those who comment on them. In this article, we wanted to show the validity and verifiability of such an understanding and positions that avoid ambiguity and even confusion in the interpretation of the meaning of these two interdependent articles of faith, a subject to the differences in their interpretation. We can say that we discussed euchology that is the thumbnail of the Roman Missal according to ecclesiology and thus portrayed a vision of the Church over the centuries in the key of prayer, centered in the lens just like the one liturgical book, which is a Missal.
    Źródło:
    Roczniki Liturgiczno-Homiletyczne; 2012, 3; 91-113
    2082-8586
    Pojawia się w:
    Roczniki Liturgiczno-Homiletyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies