Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Bochenski" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13
    Tytuł:
    Metafizyka w marksizmie? – Materializm dialektyczny i jego konsekwencje w ujęciu o. Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego
    Autorzy:
    Pawlikowski, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966262.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    marksizm
    metafizyka
    sowietologia
    Józef M. Bocheński
    Marxism
    Metaphysics
    Sovietology
    Joseph M. Bocheński
    Opis:
    Father Józef Maria Bocheński OP (1902– 1995) was considered a leading sovietologist. At the University of Fribourg, he founded in 1957 the Institute of Eastern Europe, in which the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism was studied scientifically. The results were published in the journal „Studies in Soviet Thought”. He initiated the uprising in Cologne Ost-Kolleg, where knowledge about Soviet philosophy and communism was disseminated. In the years 1961–1962 he was also its director. In his publications he undertook, among others the question of the metaphysics of Marxism, seeing it generally in dialectical materialism and, in specific applications, also in historical materialism. Criticizing this trend of thought, he focused on its latest findings, developed in the Soviet philosophy in the fifties of the twentieth century. Approaching the criticism from an external point of view, he pointed out some significant inconsistencies of Marxist materialism. According to the first law of dialectics, it proclaims a universal cause-effect determinism, and at the same time allows for the occurrence of random events. Explaining the existence of consciousness in matter with the adopted concept of cognition, Marxism mixes the epistemological and ontological order. Moreover, this trend uses the unscientific understanding of matter. On the basis of the considerations of Father Bocheński, it can also be concluded that the fundamental inconsistency of Marxist materialism is the acceptance of the existence of a spiritual element (consciousness) different in quality from mat-ter, while maintaining the thesis that there is only matter and what comes from it.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 301-316
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kategorie społeczne i ich znaczenie w myśli o. Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego OP
    Autorzy:
    Grzybowski, Jacek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966058.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Bocheński
    cywilizacja
    naród
    kultura
    społeczeństwo
    ojczyzna
    Bochenski
    civilization
    nation
    culture
    society
    homeland
    Opis:
    Józef Innocenty Maria Bocheński was one of the most colourful figures of the 20th century Polish emigration. His eventful biography would have been sufficient to endow with it several people – Dominican father, logician, historian of philosophy, sovietologist, army chaplain, pilot and traveller, renowned lecturer and valued preacher, he was one of the most original and outstanding Polish intellectuals. As a scholar, lecturer and publicist he left a vast legacy. Thomism was a starting point of his academic journey (under supervision of Fr. Jacek Woroniecki), later on he devoted himself to logic and analytic philosophy. He described himself as a rationalist, analyst and exponent of objectivity. This rationalist trait was characteristic of Fr. Bocheński - he perceived all problems and issues through the lens of philosophical realism, cognitive objectivity and, in his earlier writings, from the standpoint of Thomism with its basic metaphysical categories. In his analyses Bocheński made Aristotelian realism his point of departure, claiming that a man as a person is essentially a social being because of his spiritual nature. A human being is a social being both in a negative („a man as a person cannot live without society because his full development will be impossible to achieve without it”) and positive sense („man is adapted to society, coexistence and cooperation with other people”). These bonds and relationships are so strong that sociability constitutes an essential feature of human nature. Society is therefore a group of human persons who share a common goal which is the common good. For Bocheński all individualistic approaches, in which a man is regarded as a monad minding his own interests and goals, who enters into relationships with other people solely for serving his utilitarian purposes, unable to satisfy his egoistic desires on his own, are false. In this view, deriving from Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau, an individual needs other people only due to his own insufficiency in achieving his aims. Hence the necessity of „social contract” that unites egoistic individuals - its legal validity begets community. Bocheński rejects as opposed to reality all divisions between individual and social nature of a man, in particular the social contract theory according to which society should be understood as the outcome of an agreement between people. The most difficult, but also the most interesting social issue tackled by Fr. Bocheński is an attempt to explain what a civilisation is. Writing about civilization Bocheński usually had in mind civilizational circle – a certain area inhabited by people who have certain common ideals. He generally omitted an important but also complex and differently solved by various thinkers problem of difference between civilization and culture and their mutual relationship. Clarifying the notion of civilization Bocheński pointed out that the distinction between the three kinds of civilization, namely „subjective civilization”, „material civilization”, and „model civilization” might prove helpful. In his opinion the relationship between material civilization and subjective civilization is such that the former is the result and consequence of the latter. If we acknowledge - Bocheński wrote - that the essence of a human being is some immortal substance (soul, conscience, intellect), it follows that a man cannot be a mere instrument, but he has always to be the objective. It means that no society, nation, state or another individual has a right to subordinate completely a human being. Model civilization based on personalistic ideals can be brought about by the meeting of Greek philosophy, Roman law and Christian Gospel. This encounter made it possible to discover the uniqueness of category of person and became one of the main foundations of Christian civilization. Affirmation of a person, as Bocheński argued, is one of the most important hallmarks of this ci-vilization, without which democracy in its modern sense could not have been born and would not be able to develop.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 405-432
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Patriotyzm w etyce tomistycznej
    Patriotism in thomistic ethics
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Izabella
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2078942.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    etyka tomistyczna
    patriotyzm
    J. Woroniecki
    J.M. Bocheński
    thomistic ethics
    patriotism
    J. M. Bocheński
    Opis:
    St. Thomas Aquinas did not actually take the subject of patriotism in his deliberations. However, in Summa theologiae he discussed the virtue of piety, which is expressed in love, and estimates love for one’s parents and one’s homeland. Thus, it can be concluded that for Thomas piety is patriotism. In the twentieth century, some followers of Aquinas undertook thoughts about patriotism. Significant studies of this topic are the texts of J.M. Bocheński and J. Woroniecki. In their texts they discuss such issues as: the essence of patriotism, patriotic education, difference between patriotism and chauvinism or nationalism. Woroniecki believed that the family is the first school of patriotism. Bocheński however, while developing the concept of patriotism in Woroniecki’s approach, focuses on the issue of education of a patriotic attitude. For this reason, in the educational process, he takes human powers: intellect, will and senses, into account and gives specific suggestions for their „cultivation”.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2019, 8; 229-239
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Filozoficzna biografia Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966203.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Józef M. Bocheński
    tomizm
    logika
    sowietologia
    filozofia analityczna
    Opis:
    Józef Bocheński was born on 30th August 1902. He graduated from the Secondary School in 1920 and immediately after the final exam (matura) he joined the 8th Ulhan (light cavalry) Regiment and took part in a final part of a Polish-Bolshevik war. After the war, in 1922, he joined studies in law at the University of Lwów and after two years he attended the University in Poznań in order to study political economy. These studies were interrupted in 1926 when Bocheński joined the Seminary in Poznań which he left when moving to the Dominican novitiate in Cracow. There he adopted names Innocenty Maria. After one year of a novitiate he was sent to philosophical studies at the University in Fribourg in Swizerland, he graduated in 1934 . Two years earlier however, he was ordained a priest and in 1936, along with Jan Salamucha, Franciszek Drewnowski and Bolesław Sobociński, he organised the so called Cracow Circle. After receiving a doctorate in theology he was appointed a professor of logic at Angelicum, and he officially remained there until 1940. In 1938 he got habilitation in philosophy at the Faculty of Theology at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow. Along with the Polish Corpus of Gen. Władysław Anders he took part in the Italian campaigne. He fought in the battle at Monte Cassino (May 1944). After the end of the Second World War he became a professor of philosophy at Fribourg University and remained at that position until the retirement (1945-1972). He occupied a position of a Dean of Faculty of Philosophy (1950-1952) and a Rector. There he initiated soviet studies which brought him recognition and political significance. He visited Poland in 1987 for the first time since he left in 1939. In the next year he was awarded doctorates honoris causa at the Jagiellonian University and at the Academy of Catholic Theology (ATK) in Warsaw. Moreover, during his emigration he co-operated regularly with the Polish University Abroad established in Londyn. He died in Fribourg on 8th February 1995. During his lifetime Józef Bocheński was changing philosopical schools and views. In his youth he was a Kantian, next, he „converted” to neo-Thomism in its most traditional (handbook and essential) version, which actually was more Aristotelian than Thomistic. The next step was an attempt to „modernise” this sort of Thomism by tools of mathematical logic in order to make Thomas - as Bocheński said himself - no longer his „guru”. In the result, Bocheński ceased to explore the problems and style of classical philosophy in favour of analytical mode of philosophying. He himself divided his scientific work into four periods distinguished as follows, according to interest and passions (and views as well) dominated in particular time: 1) neo-Thomistic (1934–1940), 2) historical- logical (1945–1955) 3) sovietological (1955–1970) 4) systematical- logical (1970–1995).
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 245-264
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Filozofia ekonomii Józefa Bocheńskiego
    Autorzy:
    Łazarski, Adrian
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966189.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    filozofia ekonomii
    teoria firmy
    teoria przedsiębiorczości
    o. Józef M. Bocheński
    Philosophy Of Economics
    Theory Of Firm
    Entrepreneurship Theory
    Fr. Joseph M. Bocheński
    Opis:
    Fr. Józef Maria Bocheński, known for his many contributions, is not usually associated with the philosophy of economics, even though he had some achivements in this field. The classical analysis of the enterprise, limited to the division into capital, land, and labor, as a sociological-historical rather than an economic concept, does not contribute much to the study of economics, so Bocheń-ski’s analysis using ontological and logical tools is an attempt to remedy this. The analysis of the enterprise shows that it is a system which purpose is production. This system consists of internal and external elements and a synthesis factor in the form of the entrepreneur, who may be identical with with one or more of these elements or with none of them. As the dynamic analysis shows, the various subsystems of the enterprise may have divergent objectives, but they must be subordinated to the main objective, which is production, otherwise no objective will be fulfilled. From the work as a whole, the ideal of the entrepreneur emerges, reconciling the conflicting aspirations of the individual components of the system. These considerations provide an ontological ground for deliberation of the theory of the firm and the theory of entrepreneurship, showing the connection between these two issues. Bochenski’s work generates numerous problems of a detailed nature, mainly in the selection and number of elements, and needs to be supplemented with a theory of the boundaries of the firm.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 371-383
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Filozoficzne aspekty człowieczeństwa w ujęciu J.M. Bocheńskiego
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Izabella
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966206.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    antropologia filozoficzna
    człowieczeństwo
    humanizm
    Józef Bocheński
    antropological philosophy
    humanity
    humanism
    Opis:
    The content of the article concerns the philosophical views of the famous Dominican J. Bocheński on the structure of human existence. Bocheński himself divided his work into the neo-romantic and analytical periods. The article uses this division and focuses more on Bocheński’s later philosophical views. One of the reasons was that his neotomistic anthropological views had already been discussed in the book K. Policki, entitled: The philosophy of man in the early work of J.I.M. Bocheński. The presented article presents the structural elements of man, along with his powers. Then it deals with topics related to humanity. That is why the following parts of the paper are devoted to various areas of human activity and humanism. It seems that despite the changes in his philosophical views declared by Bocheński, he still remained an Aristotelian. It is manifested in the way of perceiving man from the perspective of his essence and accepting the spiritual and body unity. Moreover, Bocheński adopts the hegemony of the intellect in human activities (despite the declaration that, according to him, man does not differ from an animal). Since Bocheński readily expressed mutually exclusive views, it should be emphasized that establishing his position on the metaphysical structure of man is not an easy task.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 291-300
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Józef M. Bocheński jako tomista
    Autorzy:
    Zembrzuski, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966205.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    tomizm
    J.M. Bocheński
    filozofia tomistyczna w Polsce
    Opis:
    The aim of the paper is to present the following, how Thomism was understood by Bocheński, next, path of Thomistic inspirations he had followed, and finally we show Thomism Bocheński had explored when teaching his own philosophical abbreviation (ABC tomizmu). Analysis based on these issues would allow to identify the specific features of Thomism studied and explored by Bocheński. Hence, the question we might pose does not to regard the fact whether Bocheński was a Thomist or not but, what sort of Thomism he represented. Bocheński should rather be considered to be a traditional Thomist than existential one because in his philosophical work he barely treated the problem of act of existence and importance of this particular problem. However, he refrained from adopting the method fundamental for traditional Thomism, which is strict adherence (fidelity) to source texts of Aquinas. Bocheński, in being open to achievements of contemporary philosophy, especially logic, was closer to Louvain Thomism. But, he never decided to implement modern scientific trends to philosophy of Aquinas, the tendency which was foreign to the very essence of philosophy, at least in its shape understood by Bocheński. In his philosophical views Bocheński was closer to Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. And because he preferred to follow Aristotelian realism he consequently kept that stance. His interest in analysis the utterances of Thomism from a perspective of logic allow to classify Bocheński to analytical Thomism, but we should remember that in times contemporary to Bocheński, the very notion of analytical Thomism had not been coined. The aforementioned conclusions allow to recognize originality of Thomistic thought represented by Bocheński and also, to admit that Bocheński’s thought cannot be classified univocally to a particular school of Thomism.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 265-289
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Etyka w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966034.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Józef Bocheński
    etyka
    moralność
    tomizm
    filozofia analityczna
    Ethics
    morality
    Thomism
    analytic philosophy
    Opis:
    The notion of ethics has been developed by Bocheński in four areas: 1. Ethics is a normative science regarding human behaviour. Its scientific character means a „systematic research on a particular part of reality”. In the result of its normativity it „not only describes object but also indicates what this object should be like”. When speaks of human behaviour it „makes research on this set of acts who derive consciously (voluntarily) from human free will”. 2. Ethics as a normative science makes research and establishes general goal of human activity and then it considers, from the psychological point of view, a nature of human act which should be an act of realisation of a goal. In this way ethics works out the problem of ethical norm, a principle which should be followed to fulfill human act in order to achieve a goal proper to human being. Additionally, when ethics is grounded in Christian Revelation we may apply the matter of grace as supernatural support from God in fulfilling ethically good human act. 3. „There are two areas of each properly constructed ethics”. The first, in a theoretical way considers five sets of problems: the general goal of human act, the structure of human act, the problem of moral norms, the theory of character and the subject of God’s grace. The aim of the second area is practical analysis of particular features of human character, we understand them as „steady dispo-sition toward proceeding human act easily and energetic” according to a moral norm. 4. Ethics understood in that way can be atrributed to each human being. Hence, each men should adopt and cultivate in himself all properties and ethical norms. „Each human being should posses entirely human and Christian character”. 5. Individual human life shows that a teacher suppose to be equippped in some properties more than a merchant. For that reason, even there exists unity in ethics in general, we may speak of particular ethics. They consists of general ethics and on that ground they develop further principles in particular domains. In the result there may exist business ethics, academic ethics, ethics of prie-sthood, political ethics and military one.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 385-391
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Józefa M. Bocheńskiego elementarz etyki wojskowej
    Autorzy:
    Niepsuj, Jerzy
    Andrzejuk, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966053.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Józef Bocheński
    etyka
    etyka wojskowa
    tomizm
    męstwo
    Ethics
    military ethics
    Thomism
    bravery
    Opis:
    Military ethics as one of a „special ethics” is built, according to Bocheński, on morally obvious right to self-defense and obligation to defend the closest people. It is related to patriotism understood as love of the country, love is a prominent value in defense of which man is willing to sacrifice his life. With regard to characteristics of a soldier Bocheński suggests the following shape of skills and virtues proper for a military job: of prime importance is bravery, connected rather with heroism and honour than with patience and persistence. Also, virtues demanded for the process of taking decision are, as Bocheński claims, key for all militaries regardless their rank, because even the lowest, a private soldier has to decide. When it comes to taking decision, the most essential is a set of skills and values which enable its accurate conduct. Apart from suitable knowledge and skills there are wisdom and prudence as the most important virtues in taking decision. The most significant virtues of superiors, according to Bocheński, are integrity and justice, generosity and humility. Integrity means respect for law. Justice regulates all human relations. Generosity is related to a task of being a superior, and always to some socially important good, furthermore, it is a task of a superior to guide toward that important good. Humility, hence, is a condition to judge themselves and the others properly, what is indispensable for managing people. Taking decisions and superiority are related to a question of military obedience. Ethical fundament of that obedience is common good, to which army is subordinated. That common good is a principle which joins efforts of both, superiors and subordinates. The first condition of obedience is conviction that all members of community serve the same common goal. Order received from a su-perior can be a decision held at one of its stage. There are situations when an order speaks only about the task of planned activity, or it can indicate a set of means available or it may just order so-me action. The virtue of obedience means that we do not question and ponder on particular stages of a process of decision performed by superior but proceed as effectively as possible until the task is fulfilled. In his military ethics Józef Bocheński promotes the ethos of Polish soldier as a knight, hence the spiritual culture is a matter of prime importance in the army. It is crucial to develop this culture within a proper, which is humanist, frame. Advanced development of military technology must be accompanied by a care for advanced moral development.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 393-404
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Filozoficzna koncepcja zabobonu w ujęciu Józefa M. Bocheńskiego
    Autorzy:
    Herold, Natalia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966266.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    zabobon filozoficzny
    Józef Maria Bocheński
    gusła
    prawda
    metafilozofia
    Philosophical prejudices (superstition)
    truth
    metaphilosophy
    Opis:
    The aim of this paper is to show the conception of philosophical superstition understood as something which is without any doubt false but considered as undoubtedly true. The conception is presented in The Short Philosophical Dictionary of Superstitions of fr. Józef Maria Innocenty Bocheński OP. Philosophical superstition differs from superstition in general, understood as beliefs and practices grounded in conviction that there exist cause-effect relationships, which are impossible to be empirically proven but are thought to have supernatural origin. Bocheński draws from philosophical realism, including classical conception of truth, and claims that philosophical superstition is a cognitive distortion characterized by two: obviousness that a claim is false and universal conviction that this false claim is true. In this paper we present not only premises necessary to qualify some ideas as philosophical superstition but also fundaments that initiate the proces of their creation. According to Bocheński, we find remedy for superstitions in growing social significance of philosophers, whose main task would be to search and identify superstitions. For that reason, in this work we speak of topic of the social role of philosophy. Bocheński claims that not every philosophy is equally destined to fulfill this task for many philosophical ideas contributed to create superstitions. The author of the Dictionary made St. Tho-mas a specific guide on the path of searching and identifying superstitions. The additional aim of the paper is to show a historical context of perception of Bocheński’s book on philosophical super-stitions and describe his influence in various environments. We focus on numerous editions (in Polish and foreign languages) and on main revisions.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 355-369
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Józefa Marii Bocheńskiego program studiów o Bogu
    Autorzy:
    Porwolik, Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966265.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Józef Maria Bocheński
    Koło Krakowskie
    logika
    filozofia Boga
    Cracow Circle
    logic
    philosophy of God
    Opis:
    The Cracow Circle aimed at adapting the contemporary achievements of logic to the fields of Catholic philosophy and theology. The Circle was formed by J.M. Bocheński, J. Salamucha, J.F. Drewnowski, and B. Sobociński. The Circle was active in the 1930s. A special event in its history was the 3rd Polish Philosophical Congress in Cracow in 1936. During that Congress a special meeting for representatives of Christian philosophy was organized in order to discuss the relationship between Catholic thought and contemporary logic. Father Bocheński returned to the ideas of the Circle in his article, Die fünf Wege, where he analyzed the quinque viae. A revised and extended version of that work became part of his book, Gottes Dasein und Wesen. Logische Studien zur Summa Theolgiae I, qq. 2-11. In that book, Father Bocheński discusses the subsequent questions from the Summa Theologiae and analyzes Kant’s critical commentary against the cosmological argument The first chapter of that volume is titled Program of Studies on God. The text structures the research studies presented in the book, but additionally, it points to other research goals. The aim of the present paper is to present Father Bocheński’s program of studies on God, showing those postulates of the program that were realized by their author and their relationship with the scientific goals of the Cracow Circle.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 335-354
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Józefa M. Bocheńskiego koncepcja historii filozofii
    Autorzy:
    Andrzejuk, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966109.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Józef M. Bocheński
    historia filozofii
    filozofia starożytna
    filozofia średniowieczna
    filozofia nowożytna
    filozofia współczesna
    History of philosophy
    classic philosophy
    medieval philosophy
    modern philosophy
    contemporary philosophy
    Opis:
    The notion of history of philosophy is initiated by Bocheński by presentation of the notion of history itself which, according to him for the fact of treating the past („that what happened”), has two meanings: subject meaning (past events) and object meaning (historiosophy). Both of them can be further divided into two parts: history of facts and history of doctrines. History of philosophy is a typical history of doctrines. The second element of the name „history of philosophy”- which is philosophy-is etymologically linked to wisdom, present in numerous meanings: in antiquity its was simply a synonim of science. In the Middle Ages we observe division of human knowledge to revealed knowledge and natural knowledge, the latter one, in its aspect of exploring the ultimate principles and causes is called philosophy. In modern times philosophy was questioned at all or the entire science was included in its scope. For that reason Bocheński establishes the set of topics which are constantly present in the history of philosophy and which can be classified as strictly philosophical issues. They are: 1) the question of cognition (can we cognize truth?); 2) the question of science; 3) ontological issues (universalities, existence or non-existence of plurality); 4) questions of relation of science and psychic; 5) axiological issues (ethics, esthetics, philosophy of religion); 6) the question of absolute (God, eternal matter). Bocheński stresses that questions proper to philosophy can not be classified as one of the science and, what is more, contemporary methodology of science will rather not change this situation. Striking in that presentation is the lack of issues regarding philosophy of being (existence, essence, substance, accidental properties, relations, causes) with little exemption of philosophy of being inc-luded in the question of absolute. When it comes to division of history of philosophy, we may say that according to Bocheński it should follow analogically the traditional division of the European history such as classic, medieval, modern and contemporary times
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 433-451
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Ontologia w De ente et essentia św. Tomasza z Akwinu. Wprowadzenie do przekładu o. I.M. Bocheńskiego OP
    Autorzy:
    Płotka, Magdalena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966124.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Innocenty Maria Bocheński OP
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    De ente et essentia
    ontologia
    logika
    Koło Krakowskie
    szkoła lwowsko-warszawska
    Thomas Aquinas
    ontology
    logic
    Cracow Circle
    Lviv-Warsaw School
    Opis:
    In this essay I will shortly present the main characteristics of Joseph M. Bocheński’s OP translation of Thomas Aquinas’s treatise De ente et essentia. First of all, I will present the circumstances of the translation. Aquinas’s. De ente et essentia was published in the fall in 1955 in the journal “Seminary Materials for the Use of Students of Christian Philosophy”. It was a student magazine created for the internal use of students of philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, who thus provided themselves with access to philosophical texts needed for individual classes at the Faculty of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin. However, the reader should be warned that the presented edition is incomplete: of the 81 paragraphs of Aquinas’s work, which Bocheński an-nounces in his introduction, the typescript contains only the first 41. It should be also emphasized that Bocheński perceives De ente et essentia as a ontological work. The interpretation of this treatise can be seen in its entirety, as well as in numerous footnotes that place De ente et essentia within ontology, semantics and logic. Finally, I will emphasize the influence of the Lviv-Warsaw school on Neotomism in general, and on the way of studying philosophy by Bo-cheński in particular. Bocheński’s contacts with representatives of the Lviv-Warsaw school date back to the 1920s: during this period, Jan Salamucha studied theology in Warsaw. During his studies, he met Jan Lukasiewicz, who later became the promoter of his doctoral dissertation on the concept of Aristotle’s modality (he obtained the title in 1927). Then, in 1930, Salamucha wrote an extensive work on the issue of deduction in Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. At first, Bocheński was a critical reviewer of this work, but soon he decided that logic should serve the Thomism. The presence of analytical philosophy, logic and semantics are noticeable in the entirety of Bocheński’s translation.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 477-483
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-13 z 13

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies