Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Étienne Gilson" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Metodologia historii filozofii w ujęciu wybranych tomistów
Thomistic account of methodology of history of philosophy
Autorzy:
Nowik, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452671.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
metodologia historii filozofii
tomizm
Etienne Gilson
methodology of history of philosophy
Thomism
Opis:
Etienne Gilson relied his concept of doing history of philosophy on Thomistic metaphysics, so it enable him to distinguish between the proper history of philosophy and history of philosophical texts or history of philosophical doctrine; the former concerns philosophical problems disregarding their historical contexts. He referred to the way of studying history of philosophy, which was worked out by St. Thomas Aquinas as well as Aristotle and Alexandrian scholars before him, who were distinguishing between publication, understanding, interpretation and valuation of the text in text studying. Such history of philosophy allows not only to make synthesis within its framework, but also to pose a question on the adequacy of historical solutions of philosophical problems to real being; in that way history of philosophy becomes auxiliary and supporting science.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2012, 1; 173-181
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ Étienne’a Gilsona na filozofię w Polsce
The Influence of Étienne Gilson on Philosophy in Poland
Autorzy:
Gogacz, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075829.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Étienne Gilson
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
Stefan Swieżawski
Mieczysław A. Krąpiec
Thomas Aquinas
Thomism
Opis:
After the Second World War, Stefan Swieżawski gave his lectures on the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics at the Catholic University of Lublin. The lectures were based on the approaches and methodologies of Etienne Gilson. In this way, Gilson’s thought came in Polish culture. The influence of Gilson’s thought on Polish philosophers had three tangible effects. First of all, positive knowledge about the Middle Ages as such and in particular the medieval philosophy was more able to penetrate the insightful minds. Secondly, a completely new, different from Aristotelian definition of metaphysics was adopted. The definition was developed by Gilson who based on the texts of Thomas Aquinas. Finally, thirdly, Gilson’s theory of history was creatively developed in Poland philosophy, as a study of the philosophical problems that ancients authors took and which have been elaborated in ancient texts. Pedagogical activity of Swieżawski and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, who in the creative way took over Gilson’s thought, caused that existential Thomism has become one of the most known philosophical trends in Poland. At the end of the Stalinist night in Poland, Swieżawski manager to send to Gilson a series of philosophical works done at the Catholic University in Lublin; the texts concerned the history of medieval philosophy and metaphysics. In a response, Gilson encouraged him to step up his efforts to initiate research on the history of Polish medieval philosophy and philosophy of the fifteenth century in Europe. With time, a number of translations of Gilson’s books appeared in Poland. Until today they influence their readers. Today, in 21st century, Gilsonian works are used by the next - after the Swieżawski’s and Krąpiec’s students - Polish generation of Thomists.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 119-128
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gilsonian method of the history of philosophy
Gilsonowska metoda historii filozofii
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075353.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Étienne Gilson
historia filozofii
filozofia
metodologia
history of philosophy itself
history of philosophy
philosophy
metodology
Opis:
Gilsonowska koncepcja historii filozofii, określana jest też mianem „filozoficznej” koncepcji historii filozofii. Wynika bowiem z przekonania, że dzieje filozofii mają swój filozoficzny sens. Polega ona zatem na badaniu właśnie problematyki filozoficznej w dziejach filozofii z akcentem na położonym na jej filozoficzności, a nie historyczności. Tak rozumiana historia filozofii należy do dyscyplin filozoficznych, a nie historycznych. Z tego punktu widzenia też odkreśla się specyficznie filozoficzne kompetencje historyka filozofii, uzupełnione dodatkowo o określony warsztat historyczny. Z tego punktu widzenia możemy wyróżnić cztery badań historyczno-filozoficznych: nurt edytorski (chodzi o krytyczne wydawanie tekstów); nurt badań nad dziejami piśmiennictwa filozoficznego; nurt interpretacyjny, dotyczący autorów; nurt interpretacyjny, dotyczący problemów filozoficznych. Każdy z tych nurtów charakteryzuje się odmiennym przedmiotem i własną metodologią. Z tych rozważań wynikają dwa wnioski praktyczne. Pierwszy z nich dotyczy kolejności badań historyczno-filozoficznych. Ta kolejność jest specyficzna, gdyż warunkiem koniecznym każdego z etapów jest dokonanie poprzedniego. Nie może być bowiem odpowiedzialnej interpretacji problemów filozoficznych, szczególnie w takiej wersji, jaką zaproponował Gilson, czyli badania ich źródeł i konsekwencji, jeśli nie będziemy mieli solidnej wiedzy o filozofach, które te problemy formułowali. To zaś wszystko wiemy z tekstów, wobec czego musimy dysponować zarówno poprawną ich wersją, jak i znać związaną z nimi historię. Drogi wniosek praktyczny dotyczy samego historyka filozofii – jego warsztatu i kompetencji. Wydaje się, że muszą być to przede wszystkim kompetencje filozoficzne, uzupełnione o warsztat historyczny i ewentualnie dodatkowe umiejętności, związane z charakterem wykonywanej pracy (językowe, techniczne). Wynika więc z tego, że historyk filozofii jest przede wszystkim filozofem, a historia filozofii jest bardziej filozofią niż historią.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 2, 9; 133-144
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gilson i filozofia
Gilson and Philosophy
Autorzy:
Gogacz, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1810424.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
Étienne Gilson
filozofia
tomizm
historia filozofii
filozofia chrześcijańska
philosophy
Thomism
history of philosophy
Christian philosophy
Opis:
The article considers Gilson’s view on medieval philosophy, the concept of Christian philosophy, the main tendencies of Gilson’s metaphysics in the context of more important biographical data and the documented reception of his works. Gilson as a historian of philosophy is the creator of the view that the proper history of philosophy concerns the history of philosophical problems. Showing them requires that the historian of philosophy was mainly a philosopher, not only a historian and philologist. Thus, the history of schools discussed by the historian and the history of the texts that philologist discusses, does not constitute a proper history of philosophy. They are auxiliary disciplines for history philosophy. Gilson as a historian of medieval philosophy showed the diversity and richness of the themes and themes of the medieval views. He showed that medieval philosophy is a direct source of modernity and that the Middle Ages fulfilled the philosophical achievements of Greece and Rome with the theological reflection. He also claimed that medieval theology and faith caused development of philosophy towards the formation of the metaphysics of existence. As a historian of philosophy, Gilson was the author of the view that Christian philosophy is mainly about the metaphysics of existing being, because the revealed name of God prompted theologians to reflection and they worked out the theory of existence and deepened the problem of being in this way. Agreeing with Gilson that the theory of existence is unusual refinement and fulfillment in the metaphysics of being and it finds a true path to the reality of all beings including the reality of God, we should not however consider this theory as a set of conclusions resulting from the theological explanation of Christian revelation. These conclusions result from the analysis of real individual beings, which is precisely what was shown by Thomas Aquinas who made a philosophical reflection on being and views on the object of metaphysics in the history of philosophy. We can only agree that the theory of existence, applied in theology, expresses the reality of God according to the revelation. As a metaphysician, Gilson introduced the philosophy of the twentieth century metaphysics of existence and became a co-creator with Maritain existential version of Thomism. His concept of Christian philosophy and the necessity of meeting methodological requirements of postulates of positivism is imperfect in this existential version of Thomism and it evokes the need for fidelity as a consistent metaphysics of being existing, showing the reality of Self-existence. Gilson as the theoretician of cognition convincingly questioned idealism, he defended epistemological realism, formulated the theory of cognition of existence and the theory of existential claims. Finally, he mobilized many generations of philosophers to rethink the metaphysics.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 39-52
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Istnienie pierwszym aktem bytu
Existence as the first act of being
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452489.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
esse
essentia
Aristotelianism
Thomism
Aristotle
Avicenna
Thomas Aquinas
Étienne Gilson
arystotelizm
tomizm
Arystoteles
Awicenna
Tomasz z Akwinu
Opis:
From the perspective of existential Thomism, and following Aristotle’s philosophy of being (metaphysics) as the nucleus and keystone of the whole philosophy, seeking there the most important claims of St. Thomas, the article asks the three following questions: 1) What is the novum of Thomistic metaphysics? 2) What was Thomas’ way of thinking that led him to formulate the thesis that existence is the act of being? 3) Would anyone else have discovered the uniqueness of existence if Thomas Aquinas had not done it? The answers to these questions were formulated in reference to Gilson’s views and his concept of the history of philosophy and to the study of the concept of being in the texts of Thomas Aquinas and the historical sources of that concept. 1) Thomas proposed a new understanding of the structure of being, in which existence is the act that makes essence real and constitutes being’s potency, together making a real individual being. Thus, Thomas formulated a new existential theory of being, overcoming the limitations of Aristotle’s theory, and consistently explaining the issue related to esse (a problem that Avicenna and his followers - Parisian theologians of the 13th century could not solve). 2) Thomas Aquinas - with the help of Avicenna’s metaphysics - outdistances Aristotle’s essentialism, perceiving being as composed of existence and essence. Then, examining thoroughly the proposition of the Arab philosopher, he sees there inconsistency of attributing the position of accident to existence. According to Avicenna the element of being considered as the cause of the reality of being became - at the same time, as the accident - an unimportant component of essence. That is why Thomas Aquinas recognized that existence is the act of everything that makes essence, which transcended Avicenna’s theory, and thus he formulated his own existential version of the metaphysics of being. 3) It seems that nobody else but Thomas Aquinas would have put up a thesis that existence is the first act of being. And what would have been if Thomas Aquinas had not done it? It is hard to say as we have no historical data to let us discuss it. Similarly, it is impossible to answer this question even assuming Gilson’s thesis that the detailed claims of a given philosophy are the conclusion of the set of principles adopted at the beginning because Thomas did not have such a set of principles as at the starting point he modified the principles of Aristotle and Avicenna. Would someone else have made the same modifications, thus creating a “Thomistic” set of principles? The history of philosophy analyzes the things that actually happened and left their mark; it has no interest in things that did not take place and leave any trace. This could be an area for historical and philosophical fantasy, if it ever exists, but we try to stay in the field of the history of philosophy.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2017, 6; 13-25
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies