Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę ""Scholastyka"" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Ne ite ad Thomam, sed ad von Hildebrand
    Autorzy:
    Pichola, Ewa Agnieszka
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075917.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Tomasz z Akwinu
    D. von Hildebrand
    scholastyka
    integryzm
    twierdza tomizmu
    Aquinas
    scholastic
    integrism
    fortress of Thomism
    Opis:
    In this paper we posit the question which seems to be the natural implication of von Hildebrand's adherence to Catholicism. Especially, when philosophy is concerned one cannot escape the issue. Hence, we gather materials which help to answer the question what was D. von Hildebrand's stance on metaphysics of St. Thomas. We attempt to show to what extend von Hildebrand was acquianted with philosophy of Aquinas, further, what was his opinion on philosophers who represented the school of Aquinas, and how did he perceive his phenomenology in confrontation with metaphysics. We also present the context of employed by von Hildebrand phrases as „fortress of Thomism” and „narrowness” of integrists. They contribute much to the overall picture. We notice that von Hildebrand kept on loving truth, the Catholic Church and especially the Latin Mass out of the attachment to the philosophical.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 271-286
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Problem subsystencji w "Logice" Marcina Śmigleckiego
    The problem of Subsistence in "The Logic" of Marcin Śmiglecki
    Autorzy:
    Pawlikowski, Tomasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452510.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    Marcin Śmiglecki
    the second scholasticism
    subsistence
    substance
    being
    druga scholastyka
    subsystencja
    substancja
    byt
    Opis:
    Marcin Śmiglecki (1564-1618) was one of the most famous Polish representatives of the second scholastics. His work Logica, originally published in Ingolstadt (1618), was followed by three times published at Oxford (1634, 1638 and 1658).This work includes a series of logical and metaphysical problems, issue of subsistence among them the. This issue belongs to the metaphysical problematics of the substance and is associated with the concept of being. An outline of the issues of subsistence, which we find in The Logic (1618), is very important, because in the earlier lectures in Vilnius (1586/1587), our thinker barely mentioned it. The problem was discussed in the Christian tradition. On the manner its consideration influenced mainly views of Boethius (c. 480-525), who understood the subsistence as a substance take on the aspect of independent existence. This idea developed St. Thomas Aquinas (1225- 1275) in accordance with its metaphysics of existence. The concept of subsistence meant for him independence in existence understood as the act of being. Generally, the second scholasticism, which was founded on the tradition of “pure” Aristotelianism, marginalized this question. We find this expressed in the views of Francisco Suárez (1548-1617), who claimed that “to subsist” means only one of many properties of the substance and that does not matter for the theory of being. However, for Śmiglecki, the concept of subsistence was essentially important. In the field of contingent beings it enabled him to positive statement the substance as being able to exist by itself. It was a generally valid definition of subsistence, especially referring to substances created. In this meaning “the subsistence” marked the independent existence, not inherent in the substrate. In the second and the crucial meaning, the subsistence is characterized by independence from any cause. This is the case of God’s Substance, Existence itself by itself. It seems that the great advantage of the concept of subsistence in Śmiglecki’s theory was that it allowed to accurately distinguish between substance created and the uncreated. The solution of this difficult problem was made possible by drawing attention to the existential aspect of being. Aquinas’ theory of being suggested this solution, but in the period of second scholasticism Aristotelian metaphysics was favorited. Thomistic accents were probable the cause that Śmiglecki’s Logic was initially negatively censured in Roma (1615). This is the fact, in his fundamental work our author walked away from some interpretations introduced by F. Suárez and masters of Jesuits school, but finally that gave great effects.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2016, 5; 305-328
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Tomizm czeski w latach 1879-1948
    Czech Thomism in the Years 1879-1948
    Autorzy:
    Taboł, Sebastian
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/452479.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
    Tematy:
    filozofia czeska
    neotomizm
    scholastyka
    św. Tomasz z Akwinu
    tomizm
    Czech philosophy
    Neo-Thomism
    scholastic
    St. Thomas Aquinas Thomism
    Opis:
    The article begins from the state of research on the history of Thomistic philosophy to the Czech Republic. It discusse the most important figures of the Czech Thomism in 1897-1948 taking them in two generations of scholars. The particular attention is devoted to the Thomist environment Dominican Order from Olomouc who were publishing quarterly Filosofická revue in 1929-1948. As an example of the work of Czech Thomists author discusses an issue connected with the philosophical and theological aspects of upbringing the man. The achievements of Czech Thomists compared with whole Czech philosophy in author’s opinion is considerable: they organized International Conference of Thomistic Philosophy, they founded a magazine which was up to the global mark and published in it among others Maritain, Husserl, Patočka, they discussed about the latest philosophical currents and they reviewed philosophical dissertations from whole world. Czech Thomists’ writer activity also is very important: they published a lot of textbooks, monographs, dissertations and articles. Not all aims of Czech philosophers realized but they ordered relationships between faith and science. It was the reason treating Thomism in Republic Czech as a methodological thoroughness paragon.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2015, 4; 239-248
    2300-1976
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Tomistyczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies