Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Krytyka artystyczna" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Powrót do innej przyszłości. Zmiana koncepcji obrazu w myśli Mieczysława Porębskiego (1948, 1957)
    Return to another future. The change in conception of picture in Mieczysław Porębskis thougth (1948, 1957)
    Autorzy:
    Juszkiewicz, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/707114.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Porębski
    art history
    art theory
    art criticism
    20th century
    Polska
    historia sztuki
    teoria sztuki
    krytyka artystyczna
    XX wiek
    Polska
    Opis:
    In Przeglad Artystyczny which in 1957 distanced itself openly from socialist realism, Mieczysław Porebski (until then the editor in- chief of the magazine) published an article entitled Iluzja, przypadek, struktura (Illusion, accident, structure), a kind of manifesto of the new, abstract painting. In announcing it, Porebski used a lot of ideas and fragments drawn almost directly from his text of nine years’ earlier, written for the catalogue of the First Modern Art Exhibition in the Palace of Fine Arts in Kraków. It might seem that years later the author simply returned to his refl ection on modern art that had been interrupted by socialist realism, and continued it without further hindrance, according to its natural dynamics. But such a way of thinking would not refl ect the truth apparent upon comparing the two texts by Porebski, and would simultaneously be a metaphor for the most common view of socialist realism in Polish art history, as a kind of break in the natural development of artistic creativity, leaving at best an aversion for socially engaged art. An analysis of the changes made by Porebski in the newly adapted parts of the earlier text shows how the socialist realist pressure changed the concept of modern painting formulated in 1957, its spatial structure, and the status of meaning of the work of art.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki; 2013, 38; 51-58
    0080-3472
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Metoda jako gra. Mieczysława Porębskiego metodologia badań nad sztuką
    Method as game. Mieczysław Porębskis methodology of art research
    Autorzy:
    Kasperowicz, Ryszard
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/707045.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Porębski
    art history
    art theory
    art criticism
    20th century
    Polska
    historia sztuki
    teoria sztuki
    krytyka artystyczna
    XX wiek
    Polska
    Opis:
    Mieczysław Porebski was one of the most important Polish art historians of the twentieth century. An outstanding interpreter of nineteenth and twentieth-century art, he also practiced art criticism in a creative way, and was an organiser of cultural activities – a sympathetic observer of many developments in modern art. The methodology of art history occupies a special place in his scholarzy accomplishments. In contrast to many researchers, who dealt with history and its methods as a humanistic discipline, Porebski developer his own methodology of art research, which he formed under the strong infl uence of methods borrowed from information theory, semiotics, anthropology and structural sociology. As the author of numerous methodological studies, later collected in a large volume entitled Art and Information, he tried to construct a systematic approach to art, beginning with a semiotic (iconic) understanding of the work, incorporated in the system of semiotic and social communication. One of Porebski’s main objectives was to discover a koncept of art as communication, which would allow for a comprehensive view of the story of art, with room for the particular role of moments of structural breakthrough (the crises – the transgressions), modelled on the basis of the achievements of structural anthropology and modern interpretations of myth and times of festivity, operating at different levels in societies characterised by different attitudes to painting, which can nonetheless be encompassed in repetitive patterns and formulas. In giving the work a three-layered structure, centred on the original idea of “morphisms”, Porebski tried to capture the changing functions of art within the framework of the variants of specifi c stylistic codes and communication systems. At the same time, as a methodologist, Porebski was well aware of the restrictions faced by information and semiotic theories when applied to artistic (more generally, visual) images, which build symbolic systems by expressing something and pointing at themselves. Porebski continued to develop his methodology of art research, on the one hand fascinated by the possibilities of adding the rigours of accuracy to it, as is the case with linguistic and semiotic studies, and on the other shaping his decisions under the strong spell of modernity, both on an ideological as well as artistic level.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki; 2013, 38; 41-48
    0080-3472
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Obecność prac humanisty. O Mieczysławie Porębskim w 2013
    Mieczysław Porębski in 2013, or the presence of the humanists work
    Autorzy:
    Olszewska, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/707075.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Porębski
    art history
    art theory
    art criticism
    20th century
    Polska
    historia sztuki
    teoria sztuki
    krytyka artystyczna
    XX wiek
    Polska
    Opis:
    Mieczysław Porebski is considered to be one of the greatest Polish humanists. The history of his undertakings makes us reflect on the permanence and appraisal of intellectual work in Central European culture in the second half of the twentieth century. That is why in this essay I pose questions regarding whether Porebski’s studies still have a presence in contemporary academic circles, the reception of his art criticism, and the lasting effects of his selected curatorial activities. Methods of dissemination and potential continuations of his key projects were taken as the starting point. Comparing the publishing history of Mieczysław Porebski’s major texts and their presence in contemporary reading lists indicates that art studies are not the only areas drawing on the author’s legacy. For his writings are used equally often by literary scholars and representatives of humanism, which are reintegrated under the banner of cultural studies. Comparing their publishing history (the order of editions, the re-editions, the print runs), with their contemporary functioning in academic circulation, shows that the lifespan of works published as books ranges from about 30 to 40 years from the date of the last edition. From more or less the 1990s, Porebski’s scattered texts in the fi eld of art criticism have mainly been referred to in the context of research on the cultural life of the period. Among the mentioned publications, the most important in terms of the author’s reception today seems to be his Iconosphere (Warsaw, 1972, Belgrade 1978; translated by Peter Vujicic, afterword by Rodoslav Doluc). It is a work in which Porebski, in response to the reflections of semiologists of the time, attempting to get to the basics of visual communication, analysed the latter through the category of space and described the differences between the structure of language and the structure of the world of images. Thanks to Porebski, the term “iconosphere” became widely accepted in contemporary Polish humanities. I believe that the author was one of the fi rst to use it in the fi eld of art history, as early as the mid-1960s (the term was probably coined by the philosopher/existentialist Jean Wahl). The publication of the work evidently gave the “iconosphere” durability, at least in the realms of Slavic linguistics. From these observations, we can also draw valuable conclusions as to the lifespan and importance of the museologist’s work in contemporary Polish culture. The effect of Mieczysław Porebski’s curatorial activities, related to the creation of permanent exhibitions of Polish art at the National Museum in Kraków, faded away only recently. In the mid-1970s, his version of the Gallery of Nineteenth-Century Painting and Sculpture in the Cloth Hall took shape. Porebski also realized the Gallery of Twentieth Century Polish Art in the early 1990s. In both exhibitions, he juxtaposed works according to problems, assuming that they are linked by the room space. He thus created sophisticated structures, confronted masters, and willingly referred to places – events from the history of artistic life, grouping works in accordance with major exhibitions. These exhibitions played an important role in their time in defi ning the canon of Polish art of the past two centuries. Their duration was essentially restricted by external factors: the need for restoring the museum interior and stricter standards of copyright law. In the years 2005-2010, both expositions were remodelled by introducing new narratives and, to a varying degree, redefi ning the vision of history earlier proposed by Porebski. On the other hand, a good example of the continuation of his exhibiting concepts was a reconstruction of his private studio, completed in 2011 in the Museum of Contemporary Art in Kraków, under the name Mieczysław Porebski’s Library. Its creation marks a new chapter in the dissemination of the scholar’s work.
    Źródło:
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki; 2013, 38; 7-25
    0080-3472
    Pojawia się w:
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies