Temat: freedoms and rights - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Legal Basis for Introducing Restrictions on Human Rights and Freedoms during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Autorzy:: Dobrzeniecki, Karol
Przywora, Bogusław
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1597361.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-08-21
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: COVID-19 pandemic, states of emergency, restriction of human rights and freedoms
Opis:: In this article, we attempt to present the legal grounds for introducing restrictions on human rights during the COVID-19 pandemic from a comparative legal perspective. We refer to the findings of a research project completed in 2020, trying to synthesize them and confront them with existing theoretical models. We strive to capture general patterns in the legal basis for states’ actions in response to global threats such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparative legal research contributes to the creation of universal solutions, which, taking into account the specificity of the system, can then be applied in local conditions.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2021, 46, 3; 43-65
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: The Right to be Forgotten: Emerging Legal Issues
Autorzy:: Kiriiak, Oksana Vasylivna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1597354.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2021-08-21
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: right to be forgotten, right to remember, court jurisdiction, trials, human rights and freedoms
Opis:: This paper contextualizes and analyzes the main emerging approaches to the understanding of the right to be forgotten and its application in praxis, using legislation and judicial practice of the European Union and Ukraine as reference scales. By bridging the gap between positive and interpretative orders of law implementation, which were previously imperatively opposed and considered mutually exclusive in the Ukrainian legal system, the paper supports the arguments that the process of mastering the protection of right to be forgotten requires a further mindset shift equally for-Internet providers and all involved law enforcers.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2021, 46, 3; 27-42
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Rethinking Conscientious Objection to Mandatory Vaccination
Autorzy:: Tucak, Ivana
Berdica, Josip
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/43539285.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2024
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: justice
European Court of Human Rights
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
conscientious objection
Opis:: Among the member states of the Council of Europe, there is a consensus on the importance of vaccination as a successful and effective preventive health intervention. Every state aims to achieve herd immunity, i.e., a high vaccination rate of the population that will prevent the circulation of contagious diseases in the population and thus protect those who cannot be vaccinated due to age or poor health. However, despite the general recognition of the importance of vaccination, there is no consensus on a “single model” of how best to achieve the goals of mass immunization. Countries have different public health policies, so while the vaccination policy of some members of the Council of Europe is limited to a recommendation, others have made vaccination compulsory. Today, there are many opponents of vaccination and those who are hesitant. This paper will focus on those who refuse to be vaccinated based on a moral understanding of how to act in certain circumstances. The paper will explore whether countries imposing mandatory vaccination, with financial or other sanctions imposed in the case of non-compliance, should recognize the right to conscientious objection. This includes the right of adults to refuse vaccination, and respecting the religious and philosophical beliefs of parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. The article consists of two main parts. The first part will explore the legal-theoretical and legal-philosophical dimensions of the relationship between justice and conscience, with special emphasis on the interpretation of this relationship provided by the American political philosopher John Rawls. The second part of the paper will examine the issue of compulsory vaccination and conscientious objection through the prism of the rights provided for in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2024, 57, 2; 269-292
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: The Permissibility of Limiting Rights and Freedoms in the European and National Legal System Due to Health Protection
Autorzy:: Tabaszewski, Robert Krzysztof
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/915771.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: klauzule limitacyjne
zdrowie publiczne
zdrowie indywidualne
prawo międzynarodowe
prawo krajowe
legal limitations
public health
individual health
human rights and freedoms
international law
domestic law
Opis:: Artykuł dotyczy możliwości ograniczania praw i wolności ludzkich w systemie europejskim i krajowym ze względu ochronę zdrowia indywidualnego i zdrowia publicznego. Celem autora było przeanalizowanie aktualnej praktyki państw w zakresie stosowania klauzul limitacyjnych praw człowieka w systemie europejskim ochrony praw człowieka. Jest to zagadnienie istotne, ponieważ praktyka limitacji i marginesu oceny przysługująca państwo członkowskim Rady Europy podlega kontroli w trybie skarg kierowanych do Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w Strasburgu, badającego prawidłowość stosowania indywidualnych klauzul limitacyjnych zamieszczonych w Konwencji z 1950 r. Zdrowie człowieka jest natomiast jedną z głównych przesłanek dla, których możliwa jest limitacja innych praw i wolności człowieka. W kontekście licznych zagrożeń epidemiologicznych i katastrof naturalnych o charakterze transgranicznym zagadnienie ważenia praw i wolności urasta do rangi jednego z najbardziej istotnych z zakresu prawa międzynarodowego publicznego, prawa konstytucyjnego oraz prawa zdrowia publicznego. Na tle istniejących rozwiązań w systemie uniwersalnym zbadano praktykę państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej i Rady Europy zestawiając ją z poglądami doktryny i wynikami własnych badań.
The article concerns the permissibility of limiting human rights and freedoms in European and national systems due to the protection of individual and public health. The author's goal was to analyse the current practice of states in the application of human rights limitation clauses in the European system of human rights protection. This is an important issue because the practice of limitation and margin of appreciation enjoyed by the member states of the Council of Europe is subject to scrutiny by means of complaints addressed to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which examines the correct application of individual limitation clauses contained in the 1950 Convention. Human health is one of the main prerequisites for which it is possible to limit other human rights and freedoms. In the context of numerous epidemiological threats and natural disasters of a cross-border nature, assessing rights and freedoms becomes one of the most important issues in the field of public international law, constitutional law and public health law. Against the background of existing solutions in the universal system, the practice of the member states of the European Union and the Council of Europe was examined by comparing it with the views of the doctrine and the results of my research.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2020, 42, 3; 51-89
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "freedoms and rights" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język