Temat: EU law, - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Protection of The Wolf in The International and European Union Legal Systems
Autorzy:: Sobieraj, Kamila
Zacharczuk, Piotr
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1195134.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2016
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: EU law
protection of the wolf
Habitats Directive
Bern Convention
Opis:: This publication attempts to present comprehensively the principal legal acts that oblige the EU and all its Member States to secure favourable conservation status of the wolf population, as well as international legal acts regarding that issue . It also emphasizes the obligation to protect the ecological continuity between the places these carnivores inhabit . It should be pointed out that the existing publica-tions on the EU and international wolf protection regulations are limited to the two undoubtedly most important acts: the Bern Convention and the Habitats Directive .
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2016, 24, 1; 89-100
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Erosion of the Principle of Mutual Recognition. European Arrest Warrant and the Principle of Mutual Recognition in the Light of the Recent CJEU Rulings
Autorzy:: Sakowicz, Andrzej
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40452269.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2023
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: EU criminal law
mutual recognition
mutual trust
European Arrest Warrant
fundamental rights
EU law
the Court of Justice of the European Union
Opis:: An effective implementation of mutual recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice requires mutual trust between the Member State. Mutual trust has been eroded in some Member States due to the rule of law crisis. However, it is not only the rule of law crisis, but also the departure of the Member States from the shared values of respect for fundamental rights, as well as the differences in the prosecutorial systems of individual Member States, that have caused changes in the perception of the principle of mutual recognition. This paper will examine the evolving approach to the principle of mutual recognition based on the recent Court of Justice of the European Union rulings on the European arrest warrant. The analysis concludes that the CJEU attaches more importance to the protection of the principle of mutual recognition, the prosecution of perpetrators of crime, and the unwavering presumption of respect for fundamental rights by the Member states than to the effective protection of fundamental rights.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 54, 3; 11-50
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Artificial intelligence systems and the right to good administration
Autorzy:: Wróbel, Izabela Małgorzata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2106701.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022-05-30
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: EU law
fundamental rights
right to good administration
artificial intelligence
AI systems
Opis:: The use of AI in public administration is becoming a reality, although it is still a long way from large-scale undertakings . The right to good administration, well-established in EU legal order, is equally real, however, it must be borne in mind that this right has so far been defined only in relation to traditional administration . Therefore, the purpose of the paper is to examine whether the use of AI in public administration would allow individuals to fully exercise their right to good administration. To achieve this purpose, it is reconstructed, on the basis of EU law provisions in force and the case-law of the CJEU, the meaning and scope of the right to good administration, and analysed, taking into account a definition of AI systems and planned legislative changes, whether and to what extent the reconstructed understanding of this right enables the use of AI systems in public administration. In the course of research the hypothesis that the right to good administration does not preclude the use of AI systems in public administration is verified . As the conducted analysis shows, the right to good administration as interpreted in traditional administration enables the use of AI systems in public administration, provided that the appropriate quality of these systems and the level of knowledge and skills of the parties and authorities are ensured .
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2022, 49, 2; 203-223
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Digital Competences and Digital Skills in the Legal Regulation of the Digital Transformation of the European Union
Autorzy:: Szpor, Grażyna
Hajduk, Paweł
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/42857326.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2024
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: digital
competence
digital skills
higher education
knowledge
professional qualifications
EU law
digital transformation
Opis:: In the digital transformation process, the phases focusing on technical and economic aspects were followed by a phase exposing human capital issues. In approximately 3,000 acts of the European Union relating to the digital transformation process published in Eur-lex, as well as in an increasing number of national acts of the Member States, the terms “digital competences” and “digital skills” appear. They occur, inter alia, in the context of the financing of development tasks and their achievement indicators. In the application of existing law, it must be taken into account that the scopes and interrelationships of these new terms are framed differently. This ambiguity may have a negative impact on the effectiveness of digital transformation. It is postulated that the terminological consistency of the multi-level regulation should be improved and, in doing so, it should be noted that the prominence of digital skills in prospective acts and the way in which knowledge is captured can affect the use of the potential of universities.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2024, 56, 1; 207-223
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: EXTREME MATERIAL POVERTY AS A NEGATIVE PREREQUISITE FOR THE TRANSFER OF AN APPLICANT FOR INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION TO THE COMPETENT MEMBER STATE AND FOR THE REJECTION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF REFUGEE STATUS AS BEING INADMISSIBLE
Autorzy:: Wróbel, Izabela Małgorzata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/784231.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: EU asylum law, Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, Directive 2013/32/EU, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, extreme material poverty
Opis:: The essential measures for a common European asylum system adopted by the EU institutions include the Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 and the Directive 2013/32/EU. These acts relate to the various stages of the functioning of the common European asylum system, however, there may be a risk of a violation of the fundamental rights of applicants as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, including the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment (Article 4 of the Charter), at both stages. Such a risk may arise as a result of deficiencies in asylum systems of the Member States. If these deficiencies are to fall within the scope of Article 4 of the Charter, they must attain a particularly high level of severity, which depends on all the circumstances of the case. An example of attaining this particularly high level of severity is the situation of extreme material poverty. As acts of the EU asylum law do not contain the terms “particularly high level of severity” and “extreme material poverty” and all the more they do not define them, guidelines on how to interpret and apply Article 4 of the Charter in the context of the common European asylum system should be sought in the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. Therefore, the aim of the article is to explore and attempt to generalise and develop the basis and the criteria indicated by the CJEU for assessing the actual nature of deficiencies in the asylum system of the Member State in question from the point of view of the prohibition laid down in Article 4 of the Charter, with particular emphasis on the criterion of a particularly high level of severity and the situation of extreme material poverty which meets this criterion.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2019, 37, 2; 139-161
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Harmonising Accessibility in the EU Single Market: Challenges for Making the European Accessibility Act Work
Autorzy:: Drabarz, Anna Katarzyna
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/915704.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: standardisation of products and services
EU disability law
CRPD
EU internal market
persons with disabilities
Opis:: In the last decade, accessibility has become a buzzword not only among actors of the civil society advocating for the rights of persons with disabilities but also among the legislators in the European Union. The EU has adopted a series of binding regulations aiming at approximating the common understanding of accessibility and Member States’ approach to operationalising the right. Being part of EU harmonised law, the European Accessibility Act has already been considered a milestone in the process. The choice of an approach / approaches will decide about a success of its transposition into Member States legal systems.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2020, 43, 4; 83-102
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Effective Access to Defence Counsel in the Judicial Stage of Polish Criminal Proceedings in the Scope of Directives 2013/48/EU and 2016/1919/EU
Autorzy:: Zbiciak, Adrian Marek
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/915189.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:: access to a defence counsel
ex officio lawyer
court proceedings
EU directive
implementation in Polish law
Opis:: The article analyses certain regulations of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right of the accused to access to a defence counsel, limited to the stage of proceedings before a court, in the context of the provisions of two EU legal acts regarding this issue: Directive 2013/48/EU and Directive 2016/1919/EU. The provisions of the Polish CCP give the opportunity to maintain the standard of Directive 2013/48. However the problem may occure when there is an ex officio defense counsel appointed and the court would decide to proceed in his/her absence. As for the standard arising from Directive 2016/1919, Polish provisions regarding the stage of judicial proceedings meet the European standard to an even higher than minimum level. The only significant problem may arise from the obligation to submit an application for the appointment of an ex officio defence counsel within a specified period, but still thanks to specific solutions provided in Polish CCP, the standard of 2016 Directive is implemented.
Artykuł analizuje niektóre przepisy polskiego Kodeksu postępowania karnego dotyczące prawa oskarżonego do dostępu do obrońcy, ograniczonego do etapu postępowania przed sądem, w kontekście przepisów dwóch aktów prawnych UE dotyczących tej kwestii: Dyrektywy 2013/48/UE i Dyrektywy 2016/1919/UE. Przepisy polskiego k.p.k. co do zasady spełniają standard Dyrektywy 2013/48. Pewien problem może wystąpić w sytuacji, gdy wyznaczony jest obrońca z urzędu, a sąd zdecyduje się prowadzić postępowanie pod jego nieobecność. Nawet co do tej kwestii przepisy dają możliwość procedowania zgodnie ze standardem unijnym. Jeśli chodzi o wymogi wynikające z Dyrektywy 2016/1919, polskie przepisy dotyczące etapu postępowania sądowego spełniają normę unijną nawet w poziomie wyższym, niż minimalny. Jedyny znaczący problem może wynikać z obowiązku złożenia wniosku o wyznaczenie obrońcy z urzędu w wściśle określonym terminie, nadal jednak dzięki konkretnym rozwiązaniom gwarancyjnym przewidzianym w polskim k.p.k. standard Dyrektywy 2016/1919 jest zachowany.
Źródło:: Review of European and Comparative Law; 2020, 41, 2; 153-174
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:: Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki