Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Gospel of John" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Drzewo figowe, osioł i woda żywa : rola Księgi Zachariasza w Ewangelii Janowej
FIG TREE, DONKEY AND LIVING WATER. THE USE OF THE BOOK OF ZECHARIAH IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN
Autorzy:
Kubiś, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/490090.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Instytut Teologiczno-Pastoralny im. św. bpa Józefa Sebastiana Pelczara
Tematy:
Księga Zachariasza
Ewangelia Janowa
Natanael
drzewo figowe
świątynia
intertekstualność
cytat Starego Testamentu w Nowym Testamencie
aluzja
echo
Book of Zechariah
the Gospel of John
Nathanael
fig tree
temple
intertextuality
ST quote in NT
allusion
Opis:
In four sections, the article deals with four specific issues related to the use of the Book of Zechariah in the Fourth Gospel. First, nine different ways in which the Old Testament is employed in John’s Gospel are presented. In this section the article aims to justify focusing on the use of a single OT book in John’s Gospel, an approach which appeals to many scholars as the most appropriate way of dealing with the broader issue of the use of the OT in the Fourth Gospel. Such a seemingly narrow methodological choice enables the exegete to investigate virtually all possible uses of a particular OT text (book), applying the appropriate attention and thoroughness. Second, the article discusses two major methodological problems connected with the study of the OT in the Fourth Gospel, namely (1) the absence of careful, widely accepted definitions for the literary devices of quote, allusion, and echo; and, related to this, (2) the elusive nature of any objective criteria for identifying allusions and echoes. The article also broaches the issue of the rightly questioned legitimacy of using the term “intertextuality” within the realm of biblical studies employing the historical-critical method. As to the problem of definitions, Ben-Porat’s definition of literary allusion, together with Sommer’s approach to the phenomenon called an echo, are adopted in this article. Thirdly, the article presents a case study of one particular allusion in the Fourth Gospel, namely the mention of the fig tree in the narrative of the call of the first disciples in John 1:45-51. Indeed, the question of why Nathaniel confesses Jesus to be the Son of God and the king of Israel (1:49) following Jesus’ statement that he saw him under the fig tree (1:48) stands as a perennial crux interpretum in Johannine studies. Seeing an allusion to the prophecy of Zec 3:10 seems to solve this problem convincingly. Fourth, the article discusses the use of explicit quotations from Zechariah in the Fourth Gospel. The current study reveals that there are two basic focal points of the major Johannine references to Zechariah: (1) the cleansing narrative (Jn 2:13-22), with its references to Zec 6:12-13 and 14:21, and the triumphal entry narrative (Jn 12:12-16), which quotes Zec 9:9, both refer to the rebuilding of the temple; and (2) Jn 7:38, quoting Zec 14:8, and Jn 19:30-37, quoting Zec 12:10 both relate to the gift of the Spirit. Taken together, the references to Zechariah in the Fourth Gospel express two facets of a single, fundamental Johannine theological paradigm, i.e. that Jesus is the new temple: (1) the cleansing and rebuilding of the temple, understood as both Jesus’ body and the community of believers, and (2) the gift of the Spirit flowing out of the new temple, Jesus’ body.
Źródło:
Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej; 2015, 22; 211-238
1234-8880
Pojawia się w:
Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
DLACZEGO W NARRACJI JANOWEJ PIOTR NIE PŁAKAŁ PO ZAPARCIU SIĘ JEZUSA? KILKA REFLEKSJI NA TEMAT PREZENTACJI POSTACI PIOTRA W J 18,1-27
WHY DOESN’T THE JOHANNINE PETER CRY AFTER HIS DENIAL OF JESUS? REFLECTIONS ON THE PRESENTATION OF PETER IN JOHN 18:1-27
Autorzy:
Kubiś, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/490060.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Instytut Teologiczno-Pastoralny im. św. bpa Józefa Sebastiana Pelczara
Tematy:
Ewangelia Jana, J 18,1-27, Piotr Apostoł, zaparcie się Piotra, płacz Piotra, charakterystyka postaci
Gospel of John, Jn 18:1-27, Peter the Apostle, Peter’s denial, Peter’s cry, characterization
Opis:
The article seeks to shed light on the Johannine presentation of Peter, by focusing on the scenes surrounding Jesus’ arrest and his trial before the high priest. The analysis opens with pointing out the importance of Peter as a secondary character in the Gospel of John, specifically in John 18:1-27. There follows an overview of recent scholarly studies on the characters found in the Gospel of John, and how they are characterized. In the next four sections of the article, the figure of Peter is analyzed as he appears in four episodes: (1) Peter’s taking up the sword during Jesus’ arrest (18:1-12); (2) Peter’s accompanying Jesus as he is led to the place of trial (18:15); (3) Peter’s entering into the courtyard of the high priest’s house (18:15-16); (4) Peter’s three-fold denial (18:17-27). The final section of the article confronts the issue of Peter’s apparent lack of remorse in the wake of his third denial, as reflected in the Johannine narrative.
Źródło:
Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej; 2017, 24; 233-262
1234-8880
Pojawia się w:
Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies