Wszystkie pola: Przymuszała, Beata - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Nieistniejący mur? Problemy z opisem Muranowa
The non-existent wall? The problem of describing Muranów
Autorzy:: Przymuszała, Beata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1391841.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015-12-01
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:: Warsaw ghetto
Muranów
collecting memory
psychology of space
warszawskie getto
pamięć zbiorowa
psychologia miejsca
Opis:: The article presents the problem of recovering the memory of the Warsaw district of Muranów, the site of the WW2 ghetto in recent literature. Referring to one of the first works devoted to this subject (Jarosław Marek Rymkiewicz’s Umschlagplatz), the author reveals subsequent changes in the treatment Jacek Leociak, Beata Chomątowska and Elżbieta Janicka’s of the issue in their books. Indicating the oscillation between remembrance and forgetting about the ghetto, the authors adopt different perspectives to touch upon the ambiguous presence of the area's former inhabitants in the consciousness of today’s Varsovians. Their ways of focusing attention on this question may be termed a commemorative perspective, focused on the psychology of space and critical discourse. Though signaling the problem differently, the authors are united in emphasising the problems related to the Polish memory of the Warsaw ghetto.
Źródło:: Przestrzenie Teorii; 2015, 24; 97-108
2450-5765
Pojawia się w:: Przestrzenie Teorii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: W obronie nadinterpretacji (niekoniecznie prawniczej...) - polemika z Fishem
In the defence of overinterpretation (not necessarily the legal one) - a polemic with Fish
Autorzy:: Przymuszała, Beata
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1393400.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2007-08-15
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Opis:: The formula of "defence of overinterpretation" referred to in the title of this article must be received in the context of S. Fish's conception of paninterpretationism, according to which there is no possibility of verification of readings of a text. Fish assumes that we only compare interpretations and we do not have any access to "the text itself". Arguing with this interpretation, I refer to a legal conception (after all the one used by Fish) of interpretation of laws (confining the analysis to Polish doctrine). In spite of this researcher's claim (everybody "uses" laws for their own goals) the theory of interpretation indicates the necessity of separating the linguistic exegesis (explanation, interpretation) of a law which becomes a point of reference for the system, functional and axiological interpretation. The possibility of departures from the linguistic interpretation requires the existence of specific conditions threatening the system of values and at the same time is a proof of the importance of this type of interpretation. Thus, differentiation of interpretation takes into account the linguistic dimension of a text, allowing to speak about interpretations which "are not in accordance with the law". Transferring these views from the study of the press onto the studies of literature one can see the closeness of this approach to U. Eco's interpretations (the "intentio operis" conception) or - on Polish grounds - K. Bartoszyhski's and H. Markiewicz's views. "The defence of overinterpretation" appears to be a defence of the possibility of differentiating of interpretation and performing its verification.
Źródło:: Przestrzenie Teorii; 2005, 5; 135-146
2450-5765
Pojawia się w:: Przestrzenie Teorii
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Przymuszała, Beata" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język