Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "ateizm" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Ateizm współczesnych filozofów – wybrane postacie
    Autorzy:
    Drozdowicz, Zbigniew
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2134375.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-10-08
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Religioznawcze
    Tematy:
    radical atheism
    moderate atheism
    scientific argumentation on atheism
    Opis:
    In these remarks once again (this problem had occurred already in ancient times) I take on the issue of atheism of philosophers. In this case I’m interested in those modern philosophers who combined their own philosophical thought with doing one of particular scientific disciplines. Some of them (like Victor J. Stenger for example) are more recognized as distinguished scholars, however some (like Daniel Dennett for example) as scholars and atheists, and others as atheists (like Michel Onfray and Michael Ruse). From the point of view of contemporary debates on atheism it is important to show how they joined their own atheism with the theses of the sciences they recall in their works.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy; 2020, 1/275; 3-22
    1230-4379
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Teizm – ateizm – religia. Mapa współczesnych sporów w filozofii religii
    Autorzy:
    Gutowski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2134458.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-10-12
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Religioznawcze
    Tematy:
    Word-view pluralism
    theism
    atheism
    nature of God
    God of philosophers
    God of believers
    theism-atheism debate and: science
    changes in the moral landscape
    the notion of truth
    hypothetico-deductive methodology
    Opis:
    In the article Theism – Atheism – Religion. The Map of Contemporary Disputes the following theses are defended: 1) The contemporary philosophy of religion in the English-speaking world is dominated by philosophers who represent the analytical tradition understood broadly as ensuring clarity and precision of discourse, focusing on arguments controlled by logic but a the same time sensitive to the history of the discipline and to the developments in continental philosophy. 2) While in the last decades of the 20th century the problem of religious pluralism has become a key problem for the philosophy of religion, in the first two decades of the present century this position was taken over by world-view pluralism in which the basic differences are related to the theism-atheism debate. 3) Contrary to scholars representing the empirical sciences on religion, those who practice the philosophy of religion are usually not neutral towards the subject of their research: they are defenders or critics of theism and religion. This attitude is in line with the commonly accepted hypothetico-deductive methodology, which emphasizes the key role of preliminary hypotheses in explaining any phenomena. Such hypotheses should be further modified or abandoned if they are falsified by empirical data. The “empirical” data that could falsify theism or atheism are not clearly defined, so it is difficult to completely refute the initial hypothesis adopted by the philosopher of religion. However, modifications of their initial content are quite common. 4) The traditional problem of proofs for the existence of God has acquired a ritual character in contemporary discussions in the philosophy of religion: the argument of the supporters and critics of these proofs are not difficult to predict. On the map of the current debate between theism and atheism, the issue of the nature of God is in the foreground, with less attention being paid to the attributes of the “God of philosophers” defined solely by highly abstract features than to the attributes of “God of religion”, that is, God to whom people pray and in whose name they undertake various actions. The questions that are asked concern, inter alia, the legitimacy of treating certain commands written in the Bible (or other books recognized as sacred) as divine. According to atheists they are exclusive product of historical and cultural conditions, and they often contradict today’s scientific and moral knowledge. 5) The debate also concerns the problem of proper understanding of what should be morally allowed and forbidden. Conservative religious believers see moral changes as a source of evil, and liberal atheists and theists regard them as significant progress. Another problem concerns alleged support given by contemporary sciences to atheism. This support is connected mainly with the assumptions of naturalism and randomness of the evolutionary process, the acceptance of which seems to constitute not only Darwinian theory of evolution but also the evolutionary paradigm that is dominant in majority of sciences. While one can try to reconcile this assumption with deism, pantheism and the concept of a God completely transcendent to human knowledge, it cannot be reconciled with theism that recognizes the existence of God as at least partially knowable designer of the universe. For this reason, defenders of theism question these assumptions as illegitimate or even as inconsistent with the belief that theory of evolution is true.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy; 2020, 2/276; 21-36
    1230-4379
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Czy teza o nieistnieniu Boga nie zakłada jego istnienia? Recenzja książki: Jerzy Kochan, De non existentia Dei, czyli o nieistnieniu Boga, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2015.
    Does the argument about the nonexistence of the God envisage his existance? Book review: Jerzy Kochan, De non existentia Dei, that is the non-existence of God, Scientific Publisher SCHOLAR, Warsaw 2015.
    Autorzy:
    Kuberska, Dominika
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/546303.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Polskie Towarzystwo Religioznawcze
    Tematy:
    Bóg
    religia
    wiara
    teizm
    ateizm
    God
    religion
    faith
    teism
    ateism
    Opis:
    Does the argument about the nonexistence of the God envisage his existance? Book review: Jerzy Kochan, De non existentia Dei, that is the non-existence of God, Scientific Publisher SCHOLAR, Warsaw 2015.
    Czy teza o nieistnieniu Boga nie zakłada jego istnienia? Recenzja książki: Jerzy Kochan, De non existentia Dei, czyli o nieistnieniu Boga, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2015.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy; 2018, 3/269
    1230-4379
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Religioznawczy
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies