Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "NO" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
    Tytuł:
    Jak rozporządzenie Bruksela I bis rozstrzyga o jurysdykcji w sporach z międzynarodowej gwarancji ubezpieczeniowej, czyli o pojęciu sprawy ubezpieczeniowej
    How does the Regulation Brussels I bis settle the jurisdiction in disputes concerning the international insurance guarantee — on the nature of the insurance case
    Autorzy:
    Fuchs, Dariusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030083.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    jurisdiction
    insurance guarantee
    insurance contract
    Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012
    Act on Insurance and Reinsurance Activity
    Opis:
    The article presents the issue of the jurisdiction of a civil court in the light of the provisions of the EU Brussels I bis Regulation in relation to a matter in the field of insurance guarantee. This was presented against the background of qualification considerations of the insurance case and delimitation of the norms of the EU Brussels I bis Regulation in relation to disputes under the insurance contract from reinsurance disputes (in the strict sense and the so-called retrocession). At the same time, reasons were given for excluding social security from this scope. Because in practice (and in theoretical approaches) there are discrepancies as to the scope of the subject application of the standards in relation to individual insurance activities, one of the objectives of this study is to indicate that such nterpretation possibility which such a gap will remove, because it is even be harmful to the certainty of turnover, if it would appear in relation to such fundamentalconcepts as jurisdiction in international insurance disputes and jurisdiction in domestic disputes. Consequently, basically based on an autonomous interpretation and in the alternative: lex fori the possibility of refusing to apply the standards of section 3 of EU Regulation No. 1215/2012 to disputes in the field of insurance guarantee. An appropriate analysis of national law was also carried out, indicating the need for coherence between EU and internal law standards in the area of qualifying disputes arising from the insurance guarantee.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 97-135
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wykładnia umowy jurysdykcyjnej zawartej na podstawie art. 25 Rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) Nr 1215/2012. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 5 października 2018 r., I CSK 611/17
    The interpretation of the choice of court agreement concluded under Article 25 of the Brussels I bis Regulation. A note to the decision of the Supreme Court of 5 October 2018, I CSK 611/17
    Autorzy:
    Torbus, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782454.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    choice of court agreement
    forum selection clause
    interpretation
    consent of the parties
    declaration of intent
    Regulation (EU) No 1215/1212
    Opis:
    The choice of court agreement (forum selection clause) is effectively concluded if there is no doubt that the party has actually become acquainted with its content. The Court of Justice of the European Union focuses on those aspects of the conclusion of the contract that allow the assessment that the other party is not surprised by the establishment of a subjective link. The compliance with formal requirements implies that the parties agreed on the conclusion of the contract. There are no objections about so understood “real consent of the parties” as a consequence of fulfilling not only the requirements as to the form, but above all as the way of the conclusion of the contract. The acceptance of the thesis that since the party expressed the undoubted consent to conclude the contract, there is thus no problem of the interpretation of the declaration of intent, is impossible. There is no dispute that the interpretation of a declaration of intent is a legal matter,since the methods of interpretation are determined by the law. According to the Polish Supreme Court, on the basis of Regulation 1215/2012 there is no problem of seeking of the applicable law, because the rules for the interpretation of a jurisdictional agreement should be interpreted from the provision of art. 25 of this regulation. This position is based on the main argument that any deviation from the autonomous rules of interpretation creates the danger that the courts of the Member States will differently determine the law applicable. The Court of Justice of the European Union accepts that an objective (normative) method of interpreting party’s statements should be used. In some situations, it is necessary to apply legis causae to effectuate a supplementary interpretation of the declarations of will.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 123-137
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Influence of Bilateral Treaties with Third States on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Decisions in Matters on Succession — Polish Perspective
    Autorzy:
    Rylski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1029995.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    bilateral treaties
    Regulation (EU) No 650/2012
    inheritance proceedings
    international jurisdiction
    recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of succession
    Opis:
    The aim of the study is to discuss the impact of bilateral international treaties concluded by EU Member States with third countries on jurisdiction and recognition of judgments in matters of succession from Polish perspective. The author discusses the main problems in the interpretation of Article 75 of Regulation 650/2012 and the possible conflict of this solution with the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. The article indicates also practical problems related to the collision of bilateral treaties and Regulation No 650/2012 regarding, for example, the possibility of concluding choice-of-court agreements, recognition of foreign judgments in matters of succession and the possibility of issuing the European Certificates of Succession.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 91-105
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dopuszczalność pozwania pracownika z państwa trzeciego przed sądem polskim na podstawie przepisów rozporządzenia nr 1215/2012 oraz kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
    Admissibility of Suing an Employee from a Third State before a Polish Court on the Basis of the Regulation No. 1215/2012 and the Code of Civil Procedure
    Autorzy:
    Torbus, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20753131.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Regulation (EU) No 1215/1212
    procedural law
    employer
    employee
    third state
    outside the EU
    forum conveniens
    jurisdictional agreement
    choice of court
    Opis:
    The EU Regulation 1215/2012, as well as the Polish civil procedural law regarding individual employment relationships are employee-interest oriented. The employee’s domicile is a specific form of privilege on the level of the national jurisdiction regulations establishing international competence of national courts. The domicile provides effective protection for the employee in case of a potential dispute with an employer,who initiates the proceedings. Unfortunately, neither the Regulation 1215/2012 nor the Polish civil procedural law provides for equivalent protection for a third state employee (an employee from outside the EU) compared to an employee domiciled in Poland. The paper argues that despite a one-sided regulation, suing a third state employee before a Polish court is in principle impermissible. When applying the objective criterion to determine whether there is a national jurisdiction to hear the case, the court should consider the need to protect the employee and his or her legitimate interests. The author posits that the employee’s interest constitutes a legal basis for assessing whether in the proceedings before a Polish court — as forum conveniens — it is possible to safeguard the rights of a weaker party of a particular legal relationship. If a choice of court agreement was concluded, suing a third state employee before a Polish court will not be possible. This is because the prorogation agreement is subject to Article 23 of the Regulation 1215/2012. This provision requires that for the prorogation of jurisdiction to be effective, the employee, as party to an agreement, must be domiciled in one of the Member States.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 30; 31-56
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 23 marca 2016 r., sygn. akt: III CZP 112/15
    A note to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 23 March 2016 r., III CZP 112/15
    Autorzy:
    Kozioł, Agata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151103.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    significance of fault in divorce proceedings
    international divorce
    fault and no-fault based grounds for divorce
    prerequisites of maintenance obligation towards former spouse after divorce
    law applicable to maintenance obligation between divorced spouses
    private international law
    international family law
    Opis:
    The role of art. 57 § 1 of Polish Family and Guardianship Code in proceedings concerning international divorce is disputed and gives rise to many questions concerning its nature. The provision, addressed to the Polish courts dealing with divorce cases, obliges the seized court to rule on fault of spouses in the breakdown of marriage. It may then seem to remain unclear if the court shall apply art. 57 § 1 when the law applicable to divorce does not state for fault based grounds for dissolution of marriage, while the legal order applicable to maintenance obligation between former spouses requires, among other prerequisites, that the fault of the former spouse obliged to alimony is declared in court proceedings. This paper analyses the judgement of Polish Supreme Court from 23rd of March 2016, in which this issue was raised. The Author rejects the opinion of Supreme Court that the provision in question has a procedural nature. The view, that it constitutes an example of overriding mandatory provision should also be denied. As a provision of double nature: material and procedural, it should be applied by Polish courts as an instrument that enables to rule on fault in all those cases when applicable law provides for fault grounds for divorce; it should be also applied by foreign court deciding on dissolution of marriage when Polish law is applicable.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 209-221
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies