Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "EU regulation" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 15
    Tytuł:
    The Principle of a Single Estate and Its Role in Delimiting the Applicable Laws
    Autorzy:
    Pacuła, Krzysztof
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030003.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    EU Succession Regulation
    principle of unity of succession
    characterisation (classification)
    Opis:
    This paper argues that the principle of unity of succession is one of the key concepts of the Succession Regulation. By operation of this principle on the jurisdictional level, the Regulation tends to favor a perspective of a single Member State when it comes to all issues related to succession. The principle of unity of succession does not of course eliminate the need to proceed to the characterization and to delimitate the scopes of conflict of laws rules at stake. However, this principle — aiming to promote a unitary vision of a single estate in all the Member States bound by the Regulation — sets a tone for some interpretative techniques that tend to favor succession-related characterization of the issues having some importance in the context of succession with cross-border implications. According to the Author, effet utile-driven characterization, on the one hand, and succession-friendly characterization of the issues falling within ‘gray areas’ created by the operation of Article 1(2) of the Succession Regulation, on the other hand, are among them.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 107-123
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Notion of “Court” under the Succession Regulation
    Autorzy:
    Wilderspin, Michael
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1029997.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    EU Succession Regulation
    the notion of “court”
    authentic instruments
    judicial body
    competent authority
    Opis:
    The article concerns the notion of “court” in the Succession Regulation. This notion is used in the Brussels I and Brussels Ia Regulations, where it does not necessarily have the same scope. The author attempts to interpret the concept in the light of the recitals to the Succession Regulation (in particular Recital 20) and of the case law of the Court of Justice. The very general description of the concept contained in Article 3(2) of the Regulation might potentially embrace other authorities and legal professionals, where they exercise judicial functions by way of delegation of power from the court. In the author’s view, the European Court, especially in Oberle and WB v Notariusz Przemysława Bac correctly navigated its way through the Succession Regulation and ruled in a way which is both coherent as regards the operation of the Regulation and consistent with the intentions of the legislator. The above judgments are analysed also with regard to Poland’s omission to notify notaries as “courts” under Article 79 of the Succession Regulation. The European Court found that the criteria for determining whether an authority or a legal professional, in particular a notary public, constitutes a “court” aredetermined by Article 3(2) and not by Article 79. Consequently, Poland’s omission to notify was not conclusive, but was in any event correct in substance. The author expresses the opinion that the judgment is accurate on this point.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 45-56
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Application of the Succession Regulation by German courts — Selected Issues
    Autorzy:
    Kohler, Christian
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030088.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    private international law
    EU Succession Regulation
    law of German courts
    European Certificate of Succession
    Opis:
    The article discusses the impact of the EU Succession Regulation on the German system of private international law. The change came with some important differences introduced in the text of the Regulation as in comparison to previous German solutions (especially the use of the habitual residence as the main connecting factor instead of nationality), and, as a result of the number of decisions of the CJEU on the Regulation (in particular the Kubicka case).The paper presents the most important, up-to-date German case-law relating to the EU Succession Regulation. It starts with the general remarks in that regard and continues to discuss judgments covering issues of jurisdiction, applicable law, and the European Certificate of Succession. Three conclusions are drawn therefrom. First, the cases show a general willingness of the courts to cope with the fundamental changes introduced by the Regulation. In particular, the concept of “habitual residence” is applied on the basis of an autonomous interpretation by reference to the case-law of the CJEU on Regulation Brussels IIa. Second, a number of decisions make apparent that the courts are sometimes slow to accept the consequences which flow from the changes brought about by the Regulation, and which oblige to re-consider the German practice in matters of international successions. That applies in particular to the issuing of the European Certificate of Succession. Third, German courts are generally ready to initiate cooperation with the CJEU by formulating preliminary questions (three questions posed by the end of 2019).
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 27-43
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Pozycja prawna notariusza w sprawach spadkowych o charakterze transgranicznym Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-658/17 WB
    The position of a notary in transnational succession law matters. A note on the judgment of the Court of Justice of European Union in case C-658/17 WB
    Autorzy:
    Konieczna, Kinga
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030065.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Regulation (EU) 650/2012
    succession
    deed of succession certification
    notary public
    Opis:
    The commentary presents an analysis of a thesis presented by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Judgment of 23rd of May 2018. The question referred to the Court in case C-658/17 WB concerned legal definition of a ‚court’ and legal classification of the national deed of certification of succession under the provisions of Regulation(EU) No 650/2012. The Judgment states that notary in Poland that draw up a deed of certificate of succession at the unanimous request of all the parties, does not constitute a ‚court’ within the meaning of that provision. Subsequently, a deed drawn up by such authority does not constitute a ‘decision’ within the meaning of that provision. The Judgment is particularly relevant since its impact extends to national certificates of succession issued by notaries in other countries, that are part of the Latin part notary system. In conclusion it is indicated, that the Judgment rendered by Tribunal, although highly rightful, relates to merely one of numerous issues concerning use of authentic documents in cross-border succession cases.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 303-317
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    “Member States” and “Third States” in the Succession Regulation
    Autorzy:
    Basedow, Jürgen
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030038.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    EU Succession Regulation
    recognition of decisions given in Member States
    the notion of third State
    Opis:
    The author advocates a flexible approach with respect to the interpretation of the term “Member State” as employed in the Succession Regulation, allowing the differentiation between “participating” and “non-participating” States. It does not mean that the term “Member State” should always be interpreted in a wide sense including the three non-participating States: Denmark, the Republic of Ireland, and the United Kingdom. Whether a wide or a narrow interpretation is appropriate depends on the context and the purpose of the single provision. Most provisions contained in the chapter on jurisdiction refer to participating Member States only. But some articles such as the Article 13 of the Regulation, provide a counter-example. A uniform interpretation of the concept of Member State in all provisions of the Succession Regulation seems far too sweeping. It reminds of Begriffsjurisprudenz and does not take account of the purpose of the single provisions. In particular, it disregards the need for the cross-border protection of individual rights in a Union with open frontiers.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 15-25
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    La réserve héréditaire dans le re`glement 650/2012 sur les successions
    Autorzy:
    Lagarde, Paul
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030035.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    forced heirship rights
    forced heirs
    EU Succession Regulation
    hereditary reserve
    public policy exception
    private international law
    Opis:
    The article addresses the issues relating to the protection of forced heirs in international context with a particular focus on the provisions of the EU Succession Regulation pertaining thereto. It contrasts common law tradition with the solutions adopted in French law, whereby certain relatives are entitled to the hereditary reserve (la réserve héréditaire). The author discusses selected examples taken from a body of French case-law dealing with the issue in question. Amongst the cases touched upon by the author are those concerning the successions of Johnny Hallyday and Maurice Jarre, which were two cases widely discussed in the recent French jurisprudence.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 9-14
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Capacity and the Quality of Heir. Possible Interaction with Preliminary Questions
    Autorzy:
    Bariatti, Stefania
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1029992.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    private international law
    EU Succession Regulation
    capacity of heir
    legal capacity
    preliminary questions
    personal status
    family relationships
    Opis:
    The article contains an overview of the rules relating to the scope of application of the EU private international law regulations. It addresses the treatment of the relevant preliminary questions, with special reference to the Succession Regulation. The issues are discussed in three steps. The first is connected with the way of interpreting the notions and concepts, such as marriage, adoption, legal capacity etc., where such matters as personal status, legal capacity or family relationship may come to the foreground as a preliminary question. The second is dealing with the law applicable to the preliminary question. The author compares pros and cons of the “independent reference” (lex fori) and the “dependent reference” (lex causae) solutions, considering the latter as less effective, producing more negative consequences. The third step embraces questions relating to the jurisdiction with respect to preliminary question.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 57-70
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Jak rozporządzenie Bruksela I bis rozstrzyga o jurysdykcji w sporach z międzynarodowej gwarancji ubezpieczeniowej, czyli o pojęciu sprawy ubezpieczeniowej
    How does the Regulation Brussels I bis settle the jurisdiction in disputes concerning the international insurance guarantee — on the nature of the insurance case
    Autorzy:
    Fuchs, Dariusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030083.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    jurisdiction
    insurance guarantee
    insurance contract
    Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012
    Act on Insurance and Reinsurance Activity
    Opis:
    The article presents the issue of the jurisdiction of a civil court in the light of the provisions of the EU Brussels I bis Regulation in relation to a matter in the field of insurance guarantee. This was presented against the background of qualification considerations of the insurance case and delimitation of the norms of the EU Brussels I bis Regulation in relation to disputes under the insurance contract from reinsurance disputes (in the strict sense and the so-called retrocession). At the same time, reasons were given for excluding social security from this scope. Because in practice (and in theoretical approaches) there are discrepancies as to the scope of the subject application of the standards in relation to individual insurance activities, one of the objectives of this study is to indicate that such nterpretation possibility which such a gap will remove, because it is even be harmful to the certainty of turnover, if it would appear in relation to such fundamentalconcepts as jurisdiction in international insurance disputes and jurisdiction in domestic disputes. Consequently, basically based on an autonomous interpretation and in the alternative: lex fori the possibility of refusing to apply the standards of section 3 of EU Regulation No. 1215/2012 to disputes in the field of insurance guarantee. An appropriate analysis of national law was also carried out, indicating the need for coherence between EU and internal law standards in the area of qualifying disputes arising from the insurance guarantee.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 97-135
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dopuszczalność pozwania pracownika z państwa trzeciego przed sądem polskim na podstawie przepisów rozporządzenia nr 1215/2012 oraz kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
    Admissibility of Suing an Employee from a Third State before a Polish Court on the Basis of the Regulation No. 1215/2012 and the Code of Civil Procedure
    Autorzy:
    Torbus, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20753131.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Regulation (EU) No 1215/1212
    procedural law
    employer
    employee
    third state
    outside the EU
    forum conveniens
    jurisdictional agreement
    choice of court
    Opis:
    The EU Regulation 1215/2012, as well as the Polish civil procedural law regarding individual employment relationships are employee-interest oriented. The employee’s domicile is a specific form of privilege on the level of the national jurisdiction regulations establishing international competence of national courts. The domicile provides effective protection for the employee in case of a potential dispute with an employer,who initiates the proceedings. Unfortunately, neither the Regulation 1215/2012 nor the Polish civil procedural law provides for equivalent protection for a third state employee (an employee from outside the EU) compared to an employee domiciled in Poland. The paper argues that despite a one-sided regulation, suing a third state employee before a Polish court is in principle impermissible. When applying the objective criterion to determine whether there is a national jurisdiction to hear the case, the court should consider the need to protect the employee and his or her legitimate interests. The author posits that the employee’s interest constitutes a legal basis for assessing whether in the proceedings before a Polish court — as forum conveniens — it is possible to safeguard the rights of a weaker party of a particular legal relationship. If a choice of court agreement was concluded, suing a third state employee before a Polish court will not be possible. This is because the prorogation agreement is subject to Article 23 of the Regulation 1215/2012. This provision requires that for the prorogation of jurisdiction to be effective, the employee, as party to an agreement, must be domiciled in one of the Member States.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 30; 31-56
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wykładnia umowy jurysdykcyjnej zawartej na podstawie art. 25 Rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) Nr 1215/2012. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 5 października 2018 r., I CSK 611/17
    The interpretation of the choice of court agreement concluded under Article 25 of the Brussels I bis Regulation. A note to the decision of the Supreme Court of 5 October 2018, I CSK 611/17
    Autorzy:
    Torbus, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782454.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    choice of court agreement
    forum selection clause
    interpretation
    consent of the parties
    declaration of intent
    Regulation (EU) No 1215/1212
    Opis:
    The choice of court agreement (forum selection clause) is effectively concluded if there is no doubt that the party has actually become acquainted with its content. The Court of Justice of the European Union focuses on those aspects of the conclusion of the contract that allow the assessment that the other party is not surprised by the establishment of a subjective link. The compliance with formal requirements implies that the parties agreed on the conclusion of the contract. There are no objections about so understood “real consent of the parties” as a consequence of fulfilling not only the requirements as to the form, but above all as the way of the conclusion of the contract. The acceptance of the thesis that since the party expressed the undoubted consent to conclude the contract, there is thus no problem of the interpretation of the declaration of intent, is impossible. There is no dispute that the interpretation of a declaration of intent is a legal matter,since the methods of interpretation are determined by the law. According to the Polish Supreme Court, on the basis of Regulation 1215/2012 there is no problem of seeking of the applicable law, because the rules for the interpretation of a jurisdictional agreement should be interpreted from the provision of art. 25 of this regulation. This position is based on the main argument that any deviation from the autonomous rules of interpretation creates the danger that the courts of the Member States will differently determine the law applicable. The Court of Justice of the European Union accepts that an objective (normative) method of interpreting party’s statements should be used. In some situations, it is necessary to apply legis causae to effectuate a supplementary interpretation of the declarations of will.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 123-137
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Influence of Bilateral Treaties with Third States on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Decisions in Matters on Succession — Polish Perspective
    Autorzy:
    Rylski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1029995.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    bilateral treaties
    Regulation (EU) No 650/2012
    inheritance proceedings
    international jurisdiction
    recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of succession
    Opis:
    The aim of the study is to discuss the impact of bilateral international treaties concluded by EU Member States with third countries on jurisdiction and recognition of judgments in matters of succession from Polish perspective. The author discusses the main problems in the interpretation of Article 75 of Regulation 650/2012 and the possible conflict of this solution with the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. The article indicates also practical problems related to the collision of bilateral treaties and Regulation No 650/2012 regarding, for example, the possibility of concluding choice-of-court agreements, recognition of foreign judgments in matters of succession and the possibility of issuing the European Certificates of Succession.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 91-105
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Odrzucenie spadku w świetle wyroku TSUE z 2 czerwca 2022 r. (C-617/20)
    Waiver of Succession in light of the CJEU’s Judgment of 2 June 2022 (C-617/20)
    Autorzy:
    Pazdan, Jadwiga
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20750263.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    the EU Succession Regulation
    habitual residence
    acceptance of waiver of the succession, of a legacy or of a reserved share
    substantive validity
    jurisdiction
    case C 617/20
    Opis:
    The jurisdiction provided for in Article 13 of Regulation 650/2012 is ancillary to the jurisdiction regulated in Articles 4—11 of the Regulation. It covers only the declarations described in this provision. Their content is determined by the law applicable to succession. Jurisdiction under Article 13, on the other hand, does not cover the consequences of the silence of a candidate for an heir. The effects of the waiver of the succession are assessed according to the provisions of the law applicable to succession even if the waiver occurred within the jurisdiction of Article 13 of the Regulation. In the case before the CJEU, the Bremen court of succession held that since it had not been served with the original document containing the waiver of the succession with an official translation into German within the deadline set by the law application to succession (Section 1944(3) BGB), there had been no effective waiver of the succession. Responding to the preliminary questions of the German court of second instance, the CJEU correctly stated that in the case of waiver of the succession in the state, in which the waiving heir has his or her habitual residence, it is sufficient to comply with the form requirements provided for by the law of the state in which that declaration is made, without a necessity to comply with the requirements of the lex successionis. On the basis of legis processualis, the German court of succession could have requested that translation into German of the documents drawn up in Dutch is submitted. On the same basis, it could also have demanded the submission of the originals of the above documents. However, it incorrectly held that these acts must be completed within the time limit for waiver of succession provided for in the legis successionis. It is also clear that the failure of the heir waiving the succession to comply with the instruction contained in the last sentence of recital 32 of the Regulation (paragraph 74) regarding the obligation to give notice of waiver, does not render the waiver invalid. It seems desirable in future, however, to explicitly include in the Regulation the obligation to notify the court of succession of the waiver, in the country of habitual residence of the waiving heir.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 30; 139-172
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Highlights and Pitfalls of the EU Succession Regulation
    Autorzy:
    Pazdan, Maksymilian
    Zachariasiewicz, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030030.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-06-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    the EU Succession Regulation
    dispositions upon death
    intertemporal issues
    succession administration of the enterprise in the estate
    notion of a “court” and a “decision”
    deed of certification of succession
    principle of the unity of legis successionis
    Opis:
    The EU Succession Regulation constitutes a remarkable achievement of unification of conflict of law rules at the European level. It has importantly changed the landscape for all those interested in succession law, in particular, the notaries and theestate planning practitioners. The present article takes up a number of selected issues that arise under the Regulation. The paper first identifies certain general difficulties that result either from the complex nature of the matters addressed or from a somewhat ambiguous wording of the rules adopted by the EU legislator. The attention is devoted to the exceptions to the principle of the unity of legis successionis, the dispositions upon death, and the intertemporal questions resulting from the change of the conflict of laws rules in the Member States which occurred on 17th August 2015 when the Regulation started to be applied. The paper then moves to some of the more specific issues arising under the Regulation. To that effect, it first looks at the Polish Act of 2018 governing the ”succession administration” of the enterprise, which forms part of the estate. The argument is made that the rules contained in the 2018 Act should be applied by virtue of Article 30 of the Succession Regulation because they constitute “special rules” in the meaning of this provision. Second, the notion of a “court” under Article 3(2) of the Regulation is discussed in light of the recent judgment of the CJEU in case C-658/17 WB, where the European Court found that a Polish notary issuing the deed of certification of succession is not a “court” for purposes of Article 3(2). The paper provides a critical account of the Court’s decision.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 125-187
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wpływ nowelizacji dyrektywy 96/71/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 16 grudnia 1996 r. dotyczącej delegowania pracowników w ramach świadczenia usług na statut stosunku pracy
    The impact of the revision of the Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services on the applicable law to the employment relationship
    Autorzy:
    Kurowski, Witold
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030067.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-29
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    the posted workers
    freedom to provide services
    law applicable to the individual employment contracts
    Rome I Regulation
    Directive 96/71/EC
    Directive (EU) 2018/957
    Opis:
    The Directive (EU) 2018/957 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 introduced several changes to the Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, affecting the posted worker’s employment relationships directly. Article 3(1) of the Directive 96/71/EC requires that an employer has to guarantee his workers posted to the Member State, the terms and conditions of employment, in matters listed in it, resulting from the law where the work is carried out, regardless of the law applicable to employment relationships. First of all, the Directive (EU) 2018/957 introduced the new concept of “remuneration” paid to the posted workers. Secondly, it extended the list of mattes in article 3(1) by adding point (h) — “the conditions of workers’ accommodation where provided by the employer to workers away from their regular place of work” and point (i) — “allowances or reimbursement of expenditure to cover travel, board and lodging expenses for workers away from home for professional reasons.” Finally, the Directive (EU) 2018/957 established the posting period, not clearly defined before, which should not last longer than 12 months (18 months when the service provider submits a motivated notification).This paper analyses the main changes introduced by the Directive (EU) 2018/957 amending the Directive 96/71/EC in the employment relationship field.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 283-302
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Swobodny przepływ dokumentów w Unii Europejskiej: znaczenie i oddziaływanie rozporządzenia 2016/1191
    Free circulation of the documents in the European Union: the significance and impact of the Regulation 2016/1191
    Autorzy:
    Zachariasiewicz, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20748180.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    swobodny przepływ dokumentów
    dokumenty urzędowe w Unii Europejskiej
    rozporządzenia 2016/1191
    uznanie stanu cywilnego w Unii Europejskiej
    haska konwencja dotycząca apostille
    free circulation of documents
    public documents in EU
    regulation 2016/1191
    recognition of civil status in EU
    Hague Apostille Convention
    Opis:
    The article is dedicated to the (still relatively unknown) EU Regulation 2016/1191. The Regulation disposes of some of the formalities with respect to circulation of the public documents within EU. In particular, no legalization in any form, including the apostille under the Hague Convention, will be needed with respect to documents covered by the Regulation. Unliked originally planned by the Commission, the Regulation does not, unfortunately, completes a more challenging goal of mandating recognition of the civil status throughout the Union. This issue still remains subject to national conflict-of-law rules. Moreover, the scope of Regulation is relatively narrow. It does not, again regrettably, apply to many public documents which are crucial in cross-border transactions (excerpts from commercial registers, powers of attorney for sale of immovable property). The author analyses to what extent Regulation 2016/1191 offers progress in circulation of documents. This question is first raised in light of the long standing application of the Hague Apostille Convention. The author then attempts to discern the effective role of the Regulation given the fact that under Article 1138 of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure, no legalization in any form is in principle required for the foreign public documents to be treated as authentic and official proof in Poland (although the practice often is to ask for the apostille even if not required by law). Still, the Regulation 2016/1138 might come of assistance for the parties in some respects. First, it will facilitate acceptance of Polish public documents in those Member States, which have so far required apostille. Second, the Regulation may help to overcome an incorrect practice in Poland of requiring apostille by the officials, where Article 1138 actually dispenses of such formality. Third, the Regulation introduces an administrative cooperation based on the IMI system which allows to verify doubts as to the authenticity of the public document from another Member States. This last feature of the Regulation, it is argued, may prove of its true value to the freedom of circulation of public documents within the EU.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2021, 29; 91-123
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 15

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies