Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "prosecution" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Pozycja pokrzywdzonego w świetle nowelizacji Kodeksu postępowania karnego z 19 lipca 2019 r.
    The Position of the Injured Party in the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure as Amended on 19 July 2019
    Autorzy:
    Limańska, Aleksandra
    Pustuła, Marta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782395.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    injured party
    criminal process
    motion to prosecute
    questioning
    minor
    subsidiary complaint
    auxiliary prosecution counsel
    order for payment
    injunctive judgment
    amendment
    Opis:
    This article addresses some amendments of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure in so far as they affect the position of the injured party. The Act of 19 July 2019 amending the Polish Code of Criminal Code provides for a number of changes relating to that participant of criminal proceedings. The paper deals with the extension of the time limit within which it is possible to withdraw a motion to prosecute, changes to the so-called subsidiary complaint, setting a deadline for questioning the injured under Articles 185a and 185c of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure or serving the injured party with an order to pay (injunctive judgment) alongside the instructions on how to appeal against the judgment and simultaneously file a statement that the injured will act in the capacity of a subsidiary prosecution counsel. The analysis is aimed to establish whether those changes have led to the strengthening or weakening of the position of the injured party.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2020, 30, 4; 127-148
    0208-5577
    2353-9712
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Granice dozwolonej prowokacji w świetle art. 24 k.k.
    The limits of permissible provocation in the light of Art. 24 k.k.
    Autorzy:
    Tumidalska, Marta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035694.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-05-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    provocation
    the one who engages in provocation
    police
    minister of justice
    public prosecution service
    public prosecutor general
    operation- and situation assessment-related activities
    proceeding
    Opis:
    The institution of provocation in criminal law is an extremely interesting phenomenon, for it may refer both to people who do not perform any public functions as well as to people who hold such a position. In this perspective, it was necessary to indicate in the article the origin of the word provocation and its etymology. Therefore, one conducted an analysis of various definitions and their components. One also indicated the origin of the eponymous institution and the examples manifested in international body of rulings. In a description of such phenomena as provocation, it is necessary to indicate the responsibility of the person who commits the offence(s) mentioned in Art. 24 of the Penal Code. An interesting element has to do with the indication – in one of the subchapters – of the utilisation of provocation in operation- and situation assessment-related activities, which are a result of the act of law about the Police and about other services. Finally, one should ask oneself the question about the extent to which one may shift the application of regulations about responsibility, considering the catalogue of institutions which may employ such technique(s)? Therefore, should not one delimit the scope of the competence of organs such as the Public Prosecutor General/Minister of Justice, in order to enhance the efficiency of the system which was mentioned above? The conclusion of the article constitutes an attempt at answering the question about the aforementioned questions and to consider the plausibility of the combining these positions in the context of the subject which is discussed.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2018, 28, 2; 213-224
    0208-5577
    2353-9712
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Głos w dyskusji o zaniechaniu ścigania jako sposobie reakcji na przestępstwo w prawnie dopuszczalnym procesie karnym
    A voice in the discussion on cessation of prosecution as reaction to crime in legally admissible penal trial
    Autorzy:
    Basa, Michał Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035764.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-05-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    cessation of the prosecution resulting from reaching court agreement
    judicial opportunism
    conciliation
    consensus-driven approach
    preparatory proceedings
    restorative justice
    the discretionary power of prosecutors
    Opis:
    The subject of considerations is an attempt to describe and assess the institution of cessation of prosecution, resulting from reaching an agreement, as reaction to crime. The effective consensus-driven approach ought to be aimed at combining court instruments and values with the axiological basis of agreement-based litigation (namely, principle of restorative justice), and also with legal measures which allow to mete out a due penal reaction or, frequently, the cessation of prosecution. In case of proceedings regarding misdemeanours, where there is a possibility of eliminating the consequences of the crime solely by compensatory actions within victim-perpetrator relation, the state ought to waive the execution of ius puniendi. What should constitute the limit of waiving the right to punish is a combination of circumstances such as: negligible degree of social harm, reaching a plea agreement that includes the manner of compensation, along with executing thereof. Then, the sufficient reaction to crime is redressing damage or compensation for the harm suffered and the prosecutor’s decision to cease prosecution. The stage of judicial proceeding does not have to and should not be merely a forum for reaching and executing court agreements. The described variant of cessation of the prosecution combines instrumental values, such as the promptness and cost-effectiveness of proceedings with non-instrumental ones, such as due process and implementation of restorative justice. Through only partial waiver of the trial subject implementation, cessation of the proceedings may constitute a compromise between legalistic values and those of judicial opportunism.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2019, 29, 3; 89-109
    0208-5577
    2353-9712
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Karnego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies