Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "criminal evidence" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Kilka uwag na temat realizacji obowiązku oceny dowodów w procesie karnym
Few remarks on the implementation of the duty to assess evidence in a criminal proceedings
Autorzy:
Łukowiak, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25806035.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
zasada swobodnej oceny dowodów
wiarygodność dowodów
dowody
uzasadnienie wyroku sporządzane na formularzu
proces karny
principle of free appraisal of evidence
credibility of the evidence
evidence
statement of reason on a form
criminal proceedings
Opis:
W uzasadnieniach wielu orzeczeń sądów karnych znalazła się informacja o uznaniu dowodu za podstawę ustaleń jedynie z uwagi na fakt, że dany dowód nie budzi wątpliwości, brak podstaw do kwestionowania jego wiarygodności, jego niesprzeczność z innymi dowodami czy też to, że żadna ze stron nie podważała jego wiarygodności. Celem tej pracy jest zwrócenie uwagi na wadliwość sposobu, w jaki sądy karne podchodzą do ciążącego na nich obowiązku oceny dowodów. W poszczególnych częściach tekstu omówiono spotykane w praktyce powody uznawania dowodów za wiarygodne, wyjaśniając, dlaczego posługiwanie się takimi okolicznościami należy uznać za naruszenie zasady swobodnej oceny dowodów.
In many of criminal courts statements of reason there is information about accepting piece of evidence as a basis for findings only due to the fact that the piece in question does not raise any doubts, that there are no grounds for questioning its credibility, that it is consistent with other evidence or that none of the parties questioned its credibility. The aim of this work is to highlight the flawed way in which criminal courts approach their duty to assess evidence. Particular sections of the text discuss the reasons encountered in practice for finding evidence credible, explaining why the use of such circumstances should be considered a violation of the principle of free appraisal of evidence.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2022, 6, 1; 1-16
0208-5577
2353-9712
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konstytucyjne aspekty procesu karnego w działalności Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich
Constitutional aspects of a criminal lawsuit in the activities of the Ombudsman
Autorzy:
Trociuk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035696.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-05-10
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
human rights
the protection of the rights of the individual
operational control
illegal evidence
Opis:
The changes in the broadly conceived criminal procedure which were introduced in recent years refer to the problems which are crucial from the perspective of the protection of human rights, such as the scope of the authority of the services due to operational control which is conducted secretly, the model of the functioning of the public prosecution service or the unlawful acquiring of evidence in a criminal procedure. The evaluation of these changes, conducted by the Ombudsman from the point of view of the constitutional standards of the protection of the rights of the individual is not positive. The new regulations reduce the quality of these standards and they do not contain sufficient guarantees of protection against the arbitrariness of the activities engaged in these terms by the organs of public authority. This phenomenon imposes a particular duty on the courts – which hear criminal cases – to see that the final decision in a criminal case respects the universal standards of the protection of human rights.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2018, 28, 2; 205-211
0208-5577
2353-9712
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie dowodu prywatnego i dokumentu prywatnego w polskim procesie karnym
The notions of private evidence and private documents in Polish criminal proceedings
Autorzy:
Boch, Błażej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035774.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-05-10
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
private evidence
private documents
reading aloud
information
Opis:
The issues related to private evidence and documents in Polish criminal proceedings have for a long time been providing an impetus for many debates and disputes. In his text, the author analyses the opinions hitherto expressed in legal doctrine, and based on them he indicated how, in his opinion, the notions of “private evidence” and “private document” ought to be understood in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure. To this aim, he commences his consideration with an analysis of the notion of “evidence”, while stressing that it needs to be distinguished from such terms as “[a piece of] information” or “trace”. Further on, he discusses the distinction into “public [official]” and “private” evidence, and also presents his own definition of “private evidence” sensu stricto and sensu largo. Subsequently, the author proceeds to consider the notion of document in legal system, in particular in penal legal system, to eventually focus on the intended understanding of the notion of “private document” and the notion “reading aloud” included in Article 393 paragraph 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2019, 29, 3; 111-133
0208-5577
2353-9712
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Owoce zatrutego drzewa” z perspektywy oskarżyciela publicznego w aspekcie konstytucyjnych podstaw procesu karnego
The “fruit of the poisonous tree” from the perspective of a public prosecutor in terms of the constitutional foundations of a criminal lawsuit
Autorzy:
Krasoń, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035713.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-05-10
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Fruit of the poisonous tree
illegally obtained evidence
evidence obtained by means of crime
operation-related activities
Opis:
The problems of the so-called poisonous tree in the course of the preliminary legal proceedings appear and continue to appear basically in every individual instance of the evaluation of the body of evidence submitted to the public prosecutor’s department. The task of the public prosecutor’s department has to do inter alia with the keeping of law and order and the supervision of the prosecution of crime. This task is realised by the supervision of the consistency of the preliminary legal proceedings with the law, and the initialisation and the performance of operational-examination activities by law enforcement organs in the scope of activities which is stipulated in the acts of law which regulate the organisation and the object of activities of these organs. The supervision which was indicated should be realised in an in-depth, comprehensive and substantive manner. Within the framework of the evaluation of the activities engaged by other organs, inluding those that are authorised to execute and conduct operation-related activities, the public prosecutor is obliged to evaluate the correctness of the process of the accumulation of evidence and the making of decisions in terms of the scope and the means of utilising the said evidence. Such control may and should be conducted with reference to the constitutional principles, described particularly in Art. 2 – the principle of a democratic state of law, Art. 7 – the principle of legalism, Art. 45 Par. 1 – the principle of the right to a trial and the resulting principle of the right to due process. The regulations of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland have not been modified since 1997, therefore with the changed state of the regulations of the Code of Criminal Law (the addition of new regulations in Art. 168 a and b ) or the competence-related acts of law, it is still possible to interpret these regulation in terms of the constitutional norms which were indicated. The new content which was introduced to the code of criminal procedure is a source of serious constitution-related doubts, and the evaluation of the material which was submitted to be treated during criminal proceedings may lead to statements that the very fact of having acquired a piece of evidence with the violation of regulations or by means of a criminal offense and the simultaneous violation of the regulations of the Constitutions is sufficient to preclude the utilisation of a given piece of evidence in these legal proceedings and to preclude the establishment of the actual state of affairs on the basis of such a piece of evidence. It is impossible to accept a situation in which the functionaries of the state, i.e. of public authorities, can collect evidence-related material in violation of the law which is binding and it is in keeping with the law that, on the basis of this material, citizens may bear criminal responsibility.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2018, 28, 2; 61-74
0208-5577
2353-9712
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies