Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Apology" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
Tytuł:
Ethical Dimension of Time in Plato’s Apology of Socrates
Autorzy:
Pacewicz, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633653.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Socrates
the Apology
the ethical dimension of time
Opis:
The aim of the present article is to analyse the Apology in its aspect of time. When defending himself against the charges, Socrates appeals to the past, the present and the future. Furthermore, the philosopher stresses the meaning of the duration of time. Thus, the seems to suggest that all really important activities demand a long time to benefit, since they are almost invariably connected with greater efforts. While the dialogue proves thereby to be an ethical one, the various time expressions also gain an ethical dimension.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2011, 2, 1; 123-138
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
‘‘Plato Socraticus’ – The Apology of Socrates and Euthyphro
"Plato Socraticus" – The Apology of Socrates and Euthyphro
Autorzy:
Erler, Michael
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633657.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Socrates
Plato
Euthryphro
Socratic dialogues
elenctic method
Opis:
The present paper focuses on the two works of Plato’s first tetralogyso as to bring out and generally characterize the Socratic dimensionof Plato’s philosophizing. It is common knowledge that Socrates’ trialand defense inspired Plato to engage in dialogical writing which culminatedin the famous logoi Sokratikoi. The article deals with the followingissues: 1. Philosophy as a ‘care for the soul’ in the Apology; 2. “The unexaminedlife is not worth living for a human being” (Ap. 38a); 3. Philosophyas a service to the god in the Euthyphro; 4. Socrates’ elenchos;5. Plato’s logoi Sokratikoi. While the issues are lively debated in thesubject literature, the present paper makes references to several importantstudies and to the broader account of Plato’s philosophy that is to befound in Erler 2006 and Erler 2007.
The present paper focuses on the two works of Plato’s first tetralogy so as to bring out and generally characterize the Socratic dimension of Plato’s philosophizing. It is common knowledge that Socrates’ trial and defense inspired Plato to engage in dialogical writing which culminated in the famous logoi Sokratikoi. The article deals with the following issues: 1. Philosophy as a ‘care for the soul’ in the Apology; 2. “The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being” (Ap. 38a); 3. Philosophy as a service to the god in the Euthyphro; 4. Socrates’ elenchos; 5. Plato’s logoi Sokratikoi. While the issues are lively debated in the subject literature, the present paper makes references to several important studies and to the broader account of Plato’s philosophy that is to be found in Erler 2006 and Erler 2007.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2011, 2, 1; 79-92
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Socrates’ Philosophy as a Divine Service in Plato’s Apology
Autorzy:
Tymura, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633442.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Socrates
Plato
daimonion
the Delphic oracle
Opis:
The aim of the present paper is to discuss Socrates’ idea of philosophy asa service to the god. First the article investigates why Chaerephon wentto Delphi and why he asked Pythia the famous question concerningSocrates. The investigation provides a basis for distinguishing two majorperiods in his activity. The one preceding the Delphic oracle consists inconducting inquiries in a group of closest friends. The one following theDelphic oracle consist in addressing a much larger audience. An analysisof both periods suggests that the oracle from Delphi greatly affectedSocrates’ relations with other Athenians. While the present article dealsalso with the issue of Socrates’ daimonion, it hypothesizes that the voiceof daimonion and the voice of Pythia could be regarded as Apollo’sinterventions.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2011, 2, 1; 183-190
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Defiance, Persuasion or Conformity? The Argument in Plato’s Apology and Crito
Autorzy:
Domaradzki, Mikołaj
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633661.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Socrates
Plato
persuasion
relativism
civil disobedience
Opis:
The present paper attempts to throw some light on the conundrum of Socrates’ political views in the Apology and Crito. The problem resides in that the Socrates of the Apology evidently undermines the authority of Athenian democracy, whereas the Socrates of the Crito argues that his escape from prison would be tantamount to disrespecting the state, which would in turn threaten the prosperity of the entire πόλις. The article suggests that in the two dialogues, the young Plato examines the possibility of steering a middle course between embracing relativism, on the one hand, and encouraging civil disobedience, on the other. Thus, the philosopher focuses primarily on investigating the two options, without either totally subordinating the citizen to the state, or unreflexively accepting any crude pragmatism.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2011, 2, 1; 111-122
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Socrates and Deliberative Democracy. On Socrates’ Conception of Politics in Plato’s Apology, Crito and Gorgias
Socrates and Deliberative Democracy. On Socrates’ Conception of Politics in Plato’s Apology, Crito and Gorgias
Sokrates und die deliberative Demokratie. Zum sokratischen Politikverständnis in Platons Apologie, Kriton und Gorgias
Autorzy:
Jedan, Christoph
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633565.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
deliberative democracy
politics
religion
Socrates
Plato
Opis:
Die Figur des Sokrates, die uns in den frühen platonischen Dialogen entgegentritt, wird für eine Vielzahl heutiger politischer Theorien als Ahnherr reklamiert. Das Problem bei solchen Vereinnahmungsversuchen ist, dass sie den Blick auf das Sperrige, historisch Besondere und gar nicht zu unseren Erwartungen Passende des sokratischen Denkens verstellen. In diesem Artikel wende ich mich exemplarisch einer solchen Vereinnahmung von Sokrates für heutige politische Theorien zu, nämlich Versuchen, Sokrates zum Ahnherrn heutiger “deliberativer” Demokratiekonzeptionen zu erklären. Ich werde mithilfe einer stark kontextualisierenden Interpretation von drei frühen Platondialogen - der Apologie, dem Kriton und dem Gorgias - zeigen, dass solche Vereinnahmungsversuche den spezifischen religiösen Charakter von Sokrates’ “Berufung” aus dem Auge verlieren. Es ist diese religiöse Berufung, die Sokrates davon abhält, sich in einer für den athenischen “Mainstream” akzeptablen Weise in politische Diskurse einzubringen. Es wäre allerdings auch verkehrt, Sokrates zu einem im Grunde unpolitischen Denker zu erklären.1 Ich werde zeigen, dass Sokrates’ Haltung durchaus politisch zu verstehen ist. Sie repräsentiert eine Strömung im antiken griechischen politischen Denken, die der Perfektion der persönlichen ethischen Haltung einen absoluten Primat einräumt. Dabei gehe ich wie folgt vor: Im ersten Abschnitt zeige ich kurz, auf welche Weise Sokrates für verschiedene deliberative Demokratiekonzeptionen vereinnahmt worden ist. Im zweiten Abschnitt biete ich eine Interpretation der Apologie, des Kriton und des Gorgias. Im dritten Abschnitt analysiere ich zusammenfassend das sokratische Politikverständnis.
The position of Socrates in Plato’s earlier dialogues is often seen as an anticipation of contemporary political theories. This article takes issue with the claim that Socrates anticipated modern theories of deliberative democracy. It examines three early Platonic dialogues (the Apology, the Crito and the Gorgias) and argues that the Socrates presented in the dialogues is actually far more dogmatic in ethical as well as religious matters than such annexations of Socrates can acknowledge. Furthermore, Socrates does not develop a theory that would support Athenian democracy. Although politically inactive within the Athenian political framework, Socrates is nonetheless depicted in the Gorgias as formulating an “ethical” view of politics. According to this conception, true politics is always virtue‑ oriented. It is a matter of improving the characters of one’s fellow citizens, and is detached from the question of how political power should be distributed. Socrates’ political outlook is echoed in several Hellenistic philosophical schools, the Stoics in particular.
The position of Socrates in Plato’s earlier dialogues is often seen as an anticipation of contemporary political theories. This article takes issue with the claim that Socrates anticipated modern theories of deliberative democracy. It examines three early Platonic dialogues (the Apology, the Crito and the Gorgias) and argues that the Socrates presented in the dialogues is actually far more dogmatic in ethical as well as religious matters than such annexations of Socrates can acknowledge. Furthermore, Socrates does not develop a theory that would support Athenian democracy. Although politically inactive within the Athenian political framework, Socrates is nonetheless depicted in the Gorgias as formulating an “ethical” view of politics. According to this conception, true politics is always virtue‑oriented. It is a matter of improving the characters of one’s fellow citizens, and is detached from the question of how political power should be distributed. Socrates’ political outlook is echoed in several Hellenistic philosophical schools, the Stoics in particular.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2010, 1, 1; 31-44
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ηοsion, eu dzen und dikaiousune in der Apologie des Socrates und im Euthyphron
Ηοsion, eu dzen and dikaiousune in the Apology of Socrates and Euthyphro
Autorzy:
Dottori, Riccardo
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938114.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Opis:
While linguistic and analytical interpretations of the Euthyphro are usually circumscribed to two passages of the dialogue (Euthphr. 10 a 2–11 b 1), there is a general tendency to disregard the distinction between the ὅσιον and the θεοφιλές. Consequently, one makes hardly any attempt to understand Plato’s criticism of religion. The concepts of θεραπεὶα τοῦ θεοῦ and ἀπεργασία provide us with the possibility of positively characterizing piety and distinguishing it from pure love affection. Contrary to the views of Schleiermacher and Gigon, but following Willamowitz, the present paper shows that the idea of service to the god consists in the doric harmony of Λόγος and Ἔργον, combined with various duties and services to the state. While this is precisely what justice is, the criticism of religion is not solely negative. Through justice, the ὅσιον becomes elevated to εὖ ζῆν and the highest ἀγαθόν in private as well as in public dimension. Without justice, one is left with the neccessity to flee to the other world and embrace the ὁμοούσια with the god, as shown in the Theaetus. If that is the meaning of Socrates’ death, then the idea resembles Kant’s postulate of the immortality of the soul, for in both cases one is faced with the neverending task of realizing the highest good. The question is whether it is possible to realize the δικαιοσύνη in a political life. Plato considers the issue in his the Republic, Sophist, Statesman and Laws. In the Statesman, justice is the primary goal of any political life that can only be attained through cultivting the divine relationship of harmonious elements in the ὅσιον. It is here that Plato’s doctrine of the ὅσιον becomes completed.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2011, 2, 1; 57-78
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Il crocevia ontologico e i due volti della Doxa. Un’apologia della terza via in Parmenide
Ontological Crossroads and the Two Faces of Doxa. An Apology of the Third Way in Parmenides
Autorzy:
Pulpito, Massimo
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633583.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Opis:
P. Thanassas, Parmenides, Cosmos, and Being. A Philosophical Interpretation, Milwaukee 2007, pp. 109.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2015, 6, 1; 285-294
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Melisso e il problema del vuoto: apologia e/o fraintendimento del monismo parmenideo?
Melissus and the Problem of the Void: Apology and/or Misapprehension of the Parmenidean Monism?
Autorzy:
Volpe, Enrico
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938296.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Melissus
Parmenides
Leucippus
void
monism
Opis:
With respect to Parmenides’ thought Melissus was regarded as a dissident thinker already in antiquity. His polemical introduction of the concept of void and the relative idea of infinite Being seemed particularly controversial. The aim of the present paper is to examine the origins of the Melissian understanding of void in order to trace its philosophical genesis to the criticism of the Atomist Leucippus. According to the philosopher from Abdera, the Eleatic fundamental principles had to conform to the obviousness of bodies’ motion, which is why the Eleatic not-Being had to be understood as void. Melissus took issue with this view and criticized the idea of the void’s reality by means of a methodical argument. In the course of doing so, the philosopher from Samos distorted the original Parmenidean ontology, which is why his theories were often criticized severely as theoretically weak.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2017, 8, 1; 91-106
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies