Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Gryz, Ryszard" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Pacyfikacje społecznych inicjatyw w zakresie budownictwa sakralnego na przykładzie Szklar w archidiecezji krakowskiej
Pacification of Social Initiatives with Regard to Construction of Sacred Buildings as Illustrated by the Case of Szklary in Kraków Archdiocese
Autorzy:
Gryz, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477329.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:
budownictwo sakralne
stosunki państwo–Kościół
PRL
Karol Wojtyła
sacred buildings
Church–State relations
Polish People’s Republic
Opis:
The article is a case study on the origin, course and consequences of the actions on 12th August 1974, which pacified the resistance of the residents of Szklary, a village in the Kraków Archdiocese, who opposed the demolition of a room added to a catechetical building. The estate was owned by Fr Józef Pochopień, the vicar at the home parish of Racławice Olkuskie, who also commissioned the modification of the building. According to the wishes of the Catholic residents of Szklary, he planned to established an independent ministry in the village. The party and state leadership of the Olkusz Poviat and the Kraków Voivodeship recognised the construction as illegal. Before the administrative decision to block the construction came into force, representatives of the Party, officers competent for religious denominations and officers of the security apparatus had prepared a plan to demolish the unauthorised construction and decided to conduct the operation by force. The intervention involved security and police forces, who beat over thirty people, mainly women, who defended the estate on the behalf of their absent prefect. The course of the brutal action was documented in the operational materials of the Security Service. The incident proved discrimination of Catholics under the Polish People’s Republic when the construction permits concerning religious buildings were strictly regulated. The result of the conflict was positive for the residents of Szklary, who had a parish established in their village a few years later and built a church. This project became positive due to the personal effort and support by the Metropolitan Archbishop of Kraków, Cardinal Karol Wojtyła. A person strongly involved in provision of legal protection for the victims was Advocate Andrzej Rozmarynowicz. Despite the persecution, Fr Józef Pochopień, who was sentenced to suspended imprisonment, underwent financial persecution, was spied on and experienced attempted recruitment for cooperation with the Security Service, did not give up. The case of Szklary was used by the authorities of the Polish People’s Republic to create a model of combating social initiatives related to construction of sacred buildings.
Źródło:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2017, 30; 434-450
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Na masowe budownictwo sakralne nie pójdziemy”. Ekipa Gierka wobec budowy katolickich świątyń (1970–1980)
“We won’t agree to church building on a mass scale”. Gierek’s “team” on the building of Catholic places of worship (1970–1980)
Autorzy:
Gryz, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477947.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Opis:
When Edward Gierek took over as the First Secretary of the Central Committee of the United Polish Workers’ Party (PZPR) once again the hopes of the Polish people for easing the Polish People’s Republic’s (PRL) antireligious programme rose, this includes the possibility of building places of worship. Unfortunately the hegemonic party, as a matter of principle, aimed to introduce atheism while slogans of normalising relations with the Catholic Church were a mere propaganda ruse. The policy of narrowing the legal activities involved in building places of worship was created by the central party structures (the Administration Department of the United Polish Workers’ Party Central Committee – KC PZPR), administration (Office of Religious Beliefs) and police (Department IV of the Ministry of Internal Affairs) and their local government equivalents. In general all applications for building permits for religious and church buildings were turned down. Appeals from the bishops and believers came to no avail. In this situation people tried to push their long-lasting efforts to get churches to a conclusion themselves. People from many housing estates, with tens of thousands of inhabitants, but without their own church as well as villages lying even over a dozen kilometres from their parish church, pressurised the State authorities. They were strongly backed by some of the Church leaders (especially by the Bishop of Przemyśl Ignacy Tokarczuk). Alongside legal initiatives (such as letters with thousands of signatures, delegations to the high authorities) illegal activities began to spread. Existing accommodation was adapted for devotional practices or various buildings were built and then transformed. Spectacular scenes accompanied the building of these clandestine places of worship. The fight with the so-called wild church building activities strongly engaged the Security Forces. In the “building files” there is information about the close observation of local communities, the intimidation of the most active people, the destruction of the buildings, the brutal treatment of anyone who resisted. The determination of the Security Services and Citizen Militia officers in the ˚ywiec district (powiat) most probably led to the murder of a young man from Cisiec only because he was participating in the building of a church. Repressions were severe but of little effect. Till the end of the “Gierek decade” the policy was not changed. Over two hundred churches and a hundred chapels (especially in central and southern Poland) were, mostly illegally, built, which was a drop in the ocean in relation to the needs.
Źródło:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2005, 1(7); 123-153
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
  • odwiedzone
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies