Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Dariusz, Mucha," wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Zgoda skazanego na orzeczenie kary ograniczenia wolności – fikcja czy prawda?
Consent of a convict to pass on them a custodial sentence – fiction or reality?
Autorzy:
Mucha, Dariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697530.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Opolski
Tematy:
defendant
convict
custodial sentence
consent of the convict
consent of the defendant
hearing the defendant
substitutive custodial sentence
personal background data
rights and obligations of a person on whom a custodial sentence was imposed
serving a custodial sentence
cumulative obligations and deductions in the case of a custodial sentence
Opis:
In the introductory part, the paper refers briefly to the historical interpretation of the provision of article 35 § 3 of the Polish Penal Code on the basis of further amendments to the Polish Penal Code of 1997 as well as contradictory ideas concerning its interpretation. Further on, the issue concerning the interpretation of the legal norm of article 35 of the Polish Penal Code is described on the basis of its current wording, taking into consideration the legal doubts connected with it that may come about when applying this regulation in practice. The paper also attempts to explain the role of the possible consent of a convict to pass on them a custodial sentence from the perspective of not only the court, but also and mainly the defendant themselves as well as their defence counsel. This issue is discussed taking into account the situation both before and after the custodial sentence has been imposed on a given perpetrator.
Źródło:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2016, 14, 1; 77-89
2658-1922
Pojawia się w:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Glosa do wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Opolu z dnia 2 lutego 2017 r. II SA/Op 577/16
Gloss to the decision of the Provincial Administrative Court of 2 February 2017, II SA/Op 577/16
Autorzy:
Mucha, Dariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697074.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Opolski
Tematy:
gloss
nature of the expulsion penalty
student
right to study
disciplinary committee
disciplinary offence
law on higher education
disciplinary responsibility
Opis:
In the judgment with commentaries, the Provincial Administrative Court in Opole made a statement concerning the penalty of expulsion from a higher education institution as a disciplinary penalty declared only by disciplinary committees. From the point of view of the judgment with commentaries, it is of importance to specify that this penalty is not of “life-long” nature, nor dśs it result in deprivation of the right to study in other institutions. The author approves of the position held by the judgment with commentaries and claims it to be an accurate and significant voice of the judiciary, which may prove substantial in eliminating legal ambiguities (and absurdities) arising as a result of applying the provisions of law in regard to responsibilities of higher education students, drawing attention to the incomplete and insufficient form of the provision of the relevant legal regulation.  
Źródło:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2018, 16, 2; 245-257
2658-1922
Pojawia się w:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies