Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "przeszłości" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11
Tytuł:
Projekty pieczęci Towarzystwa Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
DESIGNS OF THE SEAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
Autorzy:
Brykowski, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535681.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Towarzystwo Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
TOnZP
pieczęcie Inwentarza Zamku Królewskiego
odznaka TOnZP
Opis:
Among the partly preserved records o f the Society for Protection o f Historical Monuments there are to be found five designs of an Inventory Seal o f the art collection at the Royal Castle in Warsaw. The designs, dating from 1916, are the work of W. Żyliński, a rather unknown architect. The author of the report does not plunge into a detailed description o f the said projects, his attention being focussed on their symbolic meaning which reflected the then political situation o f the Polish nation, its mood and striving for the recovery o f independence. In four designs the date 1915 had been inserted. It was meant to memorize the moment of the Society — a Polish institution set up in the Russian sector o f parti tioned Poland, 1906, upon the initiative of the Society'— having taken over the care o f the Royal Castle in Warsaw after 85 years o f the country’s servitude. The key-note of two designs is the crown o f King Sigismund III, bearing the inscription: „The Royal Castle” to remind it was during his reign that the Warsaw Castle became the residence o f the King o f Poland. In one of the projects of the seal there is an image o f a white eagle — referring to that being Poland’s emblem in the times of King Stanisław August Poniatowski, in another one, a bi-partite shield with the white eagle of the Jagiellonian dynasty, and the arms of Lithuania — to remind the idea of the Commonwealth o f Two Nations which survived throughout the period o f partitions. The only design of the Society’s seal put into effect represents a stylized fourleaf clover inscribed into a circle and with the Society’s initials in its arms and centre. It was that seal that was used for stamping archival records o f the Society for Protection of Historical Monuments.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 1; 72-73
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O założeniu Towarzystwa Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
Autorzy:
Tatarkiewicz, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538552.pdf
Data publikacji:
1958
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
założenie Towarzystwa Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
Adam Krasiński
Zygmunt Gloger
Erazm Majewski
posiedzenia TOnZP
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1958, 3-4; 154-157
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dziesięciolecie Ustawy o Ochronie Dóbr Kultury i o Muzeach
THE TENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CULTURAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AND MUSEUMS LAW, 1962
Autorzy:
Malinowski, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537259.pdf
Data publikacji:
1973
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustawa o ochronie dóbr kultury i muzeach
Towarzystwo Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
powstanie służby konserwatorskiej
dobra kultury
Opis:
It is namely this tenth year elapsing from the date on which The Cultural Property Protection and Museums Law has been passed in the Polish Seym that gave the author rise to write his article where he reminds that the above Law may be regarded as a consequence of the progressively, from the 18th century onward, growing respect for antiquities. At the same time the author points to the fact that this Law contains a number of provisions that are extending both scope of notions and range of activities in conservation and in museums in this country. From among the newly adopted conceptions to be emphasized here deserves the term „cultural property” but at the same the fact of retaining of the term „historical monument” with the use of which the Law determines the objects of cultural property that are recorded in museum inventories or in those kept by the Voivodship Conservators. As especially important the author considers the first article of the Law reading as follows: „The protection of cultural property is an obligation for the State and the duty of its citizens”. This basic statement is followed by all further provisions. Under the term „cultural property” also the modern objects are meant provided, hovewer, that they can prove important from the point of view of the nation’s cultural heritage and development of its culture. According to the author’s further reasoning the Law extends its legal protection also to battlefields and to sites connected with the Nazi persecutive actions during the last war, to objects of material culture, to monuments of nature, etc. While providing the possibility to act in many different ways the Law at the same time requires that the all conservation tre a tments be based on scientific assumptions. As a fu rther consequence of obligations that by the force of the Law in question were put on all citizens the following can be considered: the calling into being of advisory bodies supporting the Minister of Culture and Arts and those acting at Voivodship Conservators Offices; the provisions determining the use to be made of historical monuments as well as those settling the manner in which they should be made accessible to the public; or, finally, those dealing with their popularization and social contributions for the sake of their protection. The due attention has been devoted to individual collectors who were granted with a number of special privileges. What concerns museums it must be considered as appreciable that in addition to the term „museum” has been introduced that of „collection of exhibits” who are otherwise called the „museum objects”. As fully adequate as to its ability to characterize the museums practice is to be regarded a review of functions that should be performed by a museum; of them, of course, as the most important are to be considered those scientific and educational. However, it must also be stated that the ten-year experience has shown not only the advantages resulting of the Law under discussion, but also pointed to some failures the sources of which, according to the author’s opinion, must mainly be sought in the executive regulations. So, for example, as the author suggests, the Voivodship Conservators should be supplied with decisive powers while collaborating with the local authorities responsible for spatial development and townplanning; an ex officio recording of the movable monuments of the past should be made also more extensive, and especially in cases where they are kept under unfavourable conditions; obligatory practices should be introduced for persons graduating in movable monument conservation divisions a t the high schools; and, finally, much more care should be devoted to decisions concerning the cancelling the historical buildings in a Register of Historical Monuments and their demolishions. There is no doubt that provided that the more thorough consideration be paid to these decisions it would become possible to safeguard a considerable number of objects without any more serious disadvantages or burdens to national economy. Toward those demanding th a t serious alterations or amandments be introduced to the Cultural Property Protection and Museums Law the author of the present assumed a critical or even negative attitude as it is his view th at a document of such fundamental nature as a Law should be one sound enough and, thus all its provisions represent an obvious standard or even a habit governing the attitudes of the society. It is then only that it will be possible to hope th a t our cultural heritage might survive without any further losses.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1973, 2; 85-88
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
KRONIKA. Kronika Wydziału Społecznej Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości Polskiego Towarzystwa Krajoznawczego
Autorzy:
Szymański, S.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537522.pdf
Data publikacji:
1951
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Towarzystwo Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
społeczna odpowiedzialność za zabytki
Społeczna Opieka nad Zabytkami
społeczny opiekun zabytków
współpraca z harcerzami
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1951, 3-4; 215-221
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Powołanie i działalność Towarzystwa Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości z perspektywy siedemdziesięciu lat
THE SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE MONUMENTS OF THE PAST. A RETROSPECTIVE VIEW OF ITS ACTIVITIES
Autorzy:
Kowalczyk, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538271.pdf
Data publikacji:
1978
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Towarzystwo Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
działalność TOnZP
interwencje konserwatorskie
państwowa służba konserwatorska
Marian Lalewicz
Jan Zachwatowicz
Muzeum Baryczkowskie
Opis:
Thé Society for Protection of the Monuments of the Past, formed in 1906, exercised an extremely important role in preservation of Polish historical monuments in the Russian sector of partitioned Poland (where there did not exist a state conservation service) and also after Poland’s liberation in 1918. The Society assisted effectively the then scarce number of conservators, its activities having been conducted in many different lines: surveys and photographing of historical monuments, scientific research, elaboration of the methods of conservation, issuing of opinions and carrying out of conservation work on a large scale •— with regard to both the monuments of architecture and movables o f historical value, organization of exhibitions and scientific sessions, issuing of extensive catalogues and other publications. The Society was divided into a few sections all of them headed by experienced specialists, architects, artists, historians o f art, connected mostly with the Department of Architecture of the Warsaw College of Science and Technology. The seat of the Society was Baryczka House in 32 Old Town Market Square, Warsaw, where there was to be found the Society’s collection o f iconographical materials, libry and museum. The Society was dissolved by the Nazi occupation authorities in 1939 but its collection of the works of a rt saved due to the selfless efforts o f its former members. The Society for Protection o f Historical Monuments, formed in 1973, and referring to the tradition of its predecessor, commemorated the seventieth anniversary of the formation o f the Society for Protection of the Monuments of the Past by having organized a formal session in Warsaw on October 21, 1977.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1978, 2; 99-103
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jan Matejko - znawca i opiekun zabytków historii i sztuki
Autorzy:
Remer, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535836.pdf
Data publikacji:
1954
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
działalność artystyczna Matejki
Matejko w Krakowie
kult przeszłości Krakowa
Ambroży Grabowski
badania nad średniowieczną sztuką polską
historyczne malarstwo Matejki
Władysław Łuszczkiewicz
„Ubiory w Polsce”
konserwatorska działalność Matejki
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1954, 1; 4-16
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Z dziejów ochrony drewnianej architektury kościelnej w Polsce. (Karty z działalności TOnZP w latach 1907-1914)*
STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF THE PROTECTION OF WOODEN MONUMENTS OF SACRAL ARCHITECTURE IN POLAND (PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE MONUMENTS OF THE PAST 1907—1914)
Autorzy:
Brykowski, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536276.pdf
Data publikacji:
1977
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Towarzystwo Opieki nad Zabytkami Przeszłości
architektura drewniana
ochrona architektury drewnianej
drewniana architektura sakralna
kościół drewniany w Białyninie
kościół w Brzeźnicy Starej
kościół w Olbierzowicach
kościół w Zborówku
Opis:
The Society for Protection o f the Monuments of the Past was formed in Warsaw, June 28, 1906. At that time when Poland was partitioned — and, thus, deprived of her statehood and its bodies — the Society exercised not only a social function but also that of a national and formal conservation service. At the early stage of its activities the Society managed already to cover with the latter the whole o f the Russian sector o f partitioned Poland. The proceedings involved were oriented on protection and conservation of the monuments o f wooden sacral architecture and laic building as well. A telling illustration of that trend was the exhibition of the monuments o f Polish architecture, mainly the wooden one, organized in 1915. The author deals with four old wooden churches, whose documentation is to be found in the Society’s archives. In 1907 energetic steps were taken up by the Society in order to prevent demolition of the three-aisled basilica at Białynin, dating from 1521. Those endeavours were not, however, crowned with success and that has remained of that historical monuments is but a portal o f sacristy — a rare instance of architectonic wooden relief. The second wooden church — at Brzeźnica Stara, early 16th century, burnt during the hostilities in 1939 but is known to us due the photographs taken, and the descriptions and drawings made, by the members o f the Society in 1908. A similar documentation pertains to the non-extant church at Olbierzowice (1468). Now what owes its survival to the Society is the parish church at Zborówek (1459), the oldest of the dated wooden churches in Poland. It was the Society’s members that effectively opposed, in 1913, the project o f its demolition. The author states in conclusion that irrespective o f the failure of some of the preventive measures taken up by the Society, its activities in the sphere of surveying and documentation have resulted in collection of an extremely valuable material which has saved many a historical monument from sinking into oblivion.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1977, 3-4; 117-128
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona zabytków w Norwegii
THE PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN NORWAY
Autorzy:
Majka, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535671.pdf
Data publikacji:
1972
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ochrona zabytków w Norwegii
Johann Christian Dahl
kościoły typu „stav”
„stavkirke"
kościół Heddal
Norsk Folkemuseum
ogólnonorweskie Muzeum Budownictwa Ludowego
Towarzystwo Opieki nad Norweskimi Zabytkami Przeszłości (Foreningentil Norske Fortidsminnesmerkers Bevaring)
Państwowy Urząd do Spraw Zabytków (Riksantikvaren)
Zagroda Rygnestad w dolinie Setesdal
Rosesmügrenden w Bergen
górnicze miasteczko Røros
Roros
Opis:
In order to trace the beginnings of interest for historical monuments in Norway we have to go back to the late XVIII century and to link it with subject matter of the romantic works of native artists, first of all painters, who „discovered” and popularized by means of their paintings the beauty of Norvegian nature, landscape and relics of national art and architecture. Special attention has been given to objects dating back to the early medieval period of Norvegian political and economic grandeur and wooden „stavechurches” recognized as best examples of Norvegian architecture, representing the most important features of the national art. The preservation of „stavechurches” has become the matter of greatest concern for art lovers and cultural monuments curators. Also comparatively early the variety of architectural and ornamental forms in the folk architecture of wooden peasants’ farms has been noticed, which has always had the prevailing place in the architecture of the whole country. The museum preservation of the most precious monumental objects was initiated by the Swedish-Norvegian King Oscar II who organized his so called „collection” of wooden buildings at the peninsula Bydgoy in Oslo in the eighties of XIX century. That „collection” started the later Norks Folkemuseum established in 1894 by Hans Aal. In the same year Anders Sandvig opened in Lillehammer the Museum of Folk Architecture of the Valley of Gudbrandsdalen. The legal basis for preservation of the national monuments in Norway is guaranteed under the Act of 29, June 1951 enclosing and extending all previous laws in that field which had been issued since 1897. The Association for Preservation of the Ancient Monuments of Norway (Foreningen til Norske Fortidsminnesmerkers Bevaring), founded in 1844, is the oldest existing body dealing with maintenance and popularization of the social care for relics of the past. In 1912 a special Office for the Monuments of Culture was established — Rikvantikvaren — having on behalf of the state under its protection ancient monuments of the country, supervising their maintenance, needs and preservation works carried out. The Conservator Offices (Fylkeskonservator) for 18 counties and two provincial capitals, which have been founded gradually since 1962, are aimed at providing local museums of all grades and types with every possible help and assistance. As regards the preservation of the cultural monuments the conservators play the part of district informers and consultants for the Riksantikvaren. It has been thanks to the first move of the Association for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments and Riksantikvaren that the works on the recording of ancient monuments were launched aimed at producing the catalogue and the detailed file of all the architectural objects existing beyond the limits of the open-air museums. The repair works and preservation of the monuments of culture are financed mainly from the state funds and from the donations of county and local authorities but to the remarkable extent from funds delivered for that purpose by private persons and private institutions. The monumental objects transfered to skansen museums are transmitted free of charge mostly and their equipment and furnishing is exclusively transfered by donations and grants. The preservation of the cultural monuments „in situ” is considered to be the best form of preservation and in that direction turn the efforts of curators and managers of local museums. Aside from the preservation of separate objects or groupings of rural dwellinghouses (exemplified by theXVI-th century farm Rygnestad in Setesdal valley or the hamlets of Havrotunet and Agatunet in Hordaland) there is no effort spared to preserve and protect „in situ” the objects and groupings of monumental town architecture when adjusted to new conditions and needs. The ideal solution seems to be to preserve these monumental complexes in the state of „living” town districts, opened to public and constantly inhabited; as for example district Rosesmligrenden in Bergen, Gamle Stavanger, or Bryggen — street of granaries at the landing-pier of Bergen which after restoration supply room for tourist agencies and commercial offices. Another example is provided by Frysja Center in Oslo, a group of XIX century covered markets and plants forseen after restoration to serve for studios and ateliers to young artists. In view of the quickly spreading reurbanization of small towns and hamlets the preservation of the most precious monumental objects in the open-air museums becomes a problem of great importance. Open-air museums, called in Norway Folk Museums (Folkmuseer) amount at present to the total of 120. They make up almost 70°/o of the total number of all museums associated in the Norvegian Association of Museums which follow the main division into the central, province, county, district and local museums. Norsk Folkemuseum in Oslo being the most important museum and scientific center acts as sort of central museum for all open-air museums in Norway. The dynamic development of local museums, which has been going on in our century, deserves special attention as it bears evidence of the constant increase of social awareness and interest for the preservation of the most precious relics of the cultural heritage.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1972, 2; 86-100
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-11 z 11

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies