Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "polityka ochrony" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Studium warunków i problemów środowiska w ośrodkach zabytkowych
THE STUDY OF CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS OF ENVIRONMENT IN HISTORICAL CENTRES
Autorzy:
Gazzola, Pietro
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535159.pdf
Data publikacji:
1976
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
problemy środowiska w ośrodkach zabytkowych
efekty postępu technicznego
planowanie urbanistyczne
zabytkowe ośrodki miejskie
ochrona miejsc zabytkowych
polityka ochrony zabytków
Opis:
The author assumes that historical towns and villages all oveir the [world suffer destruction as a result of economic development. This concerns especially the youngest nations where industrialization happens very rapidly. Factors that break balance between man and his life environment arose as early as in the 19th century. To these factors belongs an incipient idea of new aglomerations which have spread around cities. They lean to historical centres and thus gradually turn into obstacles on the roads that link old towns with the economic base. As early as in the 19th century old — town districts were abandoned and technological achievements bred, prejudice against monuments of the past. The present task of restorers is to reconcile nowaday necessities with the old ones and to evaluate old cities. There is a tendency to destroy these historical centres and the disinclination to lay out money for their restoration is prevalent. We must also pay attention to the fact that the new environment we create is a spiritless and unnatural machine in possession of forms which are strange to us and overpower us. This paradoxical situation is connected with the use of free time it becomes clear that it is insufficient to solve this problem by organizing recreation areas. As they want to overcome inflexibility of modern constructions, people aim at cooperation in creation of new environment in which they would draw a -clear border line between the residential area and the area under protection where there would be room for both nature and historical substance. The author calls for educational campaign which would inform society that monuments intuitively answer their specific needs. The efforts о-f conservators one centred upon revitalization of historical towns which, as it appears is possible. However, the criticism of initiatives in this field reduced to the problem of costs according to the -principle which says that construction is less expensive than reconstruction. But on the other hand, lif we take also into account the value of the regained -environment and qualities that enable to protect men effectively from the loss of spiritual values, work on that reconstruction is cheaper than construction. What is meant here is the reconstruction in which the original character of a -building remains in agreement with the necessities of modern life. Such a historical structure ought to be provided with the possibility to fulfill a fit function when the process of transmission of historical and aesthetic values to the building takes place. Thus reconstruction reguires an appropriate evaluation of the given structure. In the following part of the article the author accuses urbanists of elimination of those historical structures which -they consider unfit to the new -needs. It is a tendency which takes into consideration neither the picture of the whole human life environment nor humanistic culture. It is exactly this culture on which our civilization is based and that is why it is likely to become an essential progress factor. Humanism, however, cannot be understood as privilege of the same -group of people -— it is a -common phenomen which aims at increase of general living standard. Now it is the very moment ti introduce order in the magnificent scientific and technological progress. This progress should help us to overcome the present chaos and to achieve new reality — harmonious and humane.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 1; 3-8
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe w świetle ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego
Intangible cultural heritage in the light of protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions
Autorzy:
Ratajski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538459.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
UNESCO
niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego z 2003 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego z 2005 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego z 1972 roku
Program UNESCO Pamięć Świata
społeczność lokalna
tożsamość
dziedzictwo materialne
zrównoważony rozwój
kultura
dialog pokoju
dialog kultur
różnorodność wyrazu kulturowego
lista reprezentatywna niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego ludzkości
lista światowego dziedzictwa
polityka kulturalna
polityka rozwojowa
kultura narodowa
kultura lokalna
dobra kultury
przemysły kultury
Milenijne Cele Rozwoju ONZ
prawa człowieka
Opis:
The article refers to two UNESCO conventions adopted by Poland in recent years: The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003 and the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 2005. On one hand, comparing the content of these documents allows better understanding of the keynote of the concept of safeguarding intangible national heritage applied by UNESCO, and, on the other hand, this guiding principle shows the long distance covered while shaping the vision of cultural heritage over forty years from the establishment of the Convention on Safeguarding the Cultural and Natural Heritage in 1972. To complete the picture, UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” Programme of 1992, concerning safeguarding the documentary heritage, including the digital heritage, must be mentioned. These documents capture the diverse landscape of human cultural heritage, being complementary to each other. They are permeated by the principles of the protection and promotion of the heritage to varying degrees: equality, diversity, equivalency, share in the sustainable development, importance of an individual creator, and also an important role of the local community in this process. They indicate the evolution of the development conditions based on the cultural awareness, sense of identity, formed in the process of gradual identification of one’s own tangible and intangible heritage. They emphasize the possibility of a significant participation of culture in development. The Preamble to the Convention from 2005 contains provisions which formulate principles in a clear way, and also shed light on understanding other UNESCO conventions and programmes, especially on the particularly important Convention from 2003. The principle of non-evaluation, which applies to making new entries on the Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, so difficult to understand in the light of the experience related to the application of the criteria for making new entries on the World Heritage List, in accordance with the Convention on Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage from 1972, gains importance in the perspective of “cultural diversity forming a common heritage of humanity” and being “a mainspring for sustainable development for communities, peoples and nations”. The Convention emphasizes the importance of culture for social cohesion; developmental role of exchanges and interactions between cultures based on freedom of thought, expression and information, as well as diversity of media; the importance of linguistic diversity; the importance of vitality of cultures, including for persons who belong to minorities and indigenous people, as “manifested in their freedom to create, disseminate and distribute their traditional, cultural expressions and to have access thereto, so as to benefit them for their own development”. These statements give special meaning to the main thoughts of the Convention of 2003, which indicates the fundamental importance of the local community and individual carriers in ensuring vitality of the intangible heritage as a basic condition for its protection. Hence the differences in determination of goods added to the lists established on the basis of the Convention of 1972 and of 2003. In the first case, the dominating principle is the principle of selection of the most outstanding works in a given field, based on the methodology determined by specialists using the criteria of European historical and aesthetic tradition. In the case of the Convention of 2003, there was a clear evolution towards the recognition of the values of cultural phenomena rooted in the local context, proving, first of all, the diversity and authenticity of these phenomena, with their significance in creating the culture for the local community and as a manifestation of their identity, and, with the use of tools for the protection of these phenomena/ elements, may participate in the dialogue of cultures on the national and global scale. The process of the implementation of the Convention gives a huge chance to prepare a methodology consistent with the assumptions of the Convention of 2003, by means of activities that aim at creating the national register of the intangible heritage, and thus recognize, disseminate and maintain the richness of intangible culture in Poland which, as a result of a well conducted cultural policy consistent with the principles of the Convention of 2005, should be present in the developmental processes of our country in a creative manner.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 5-18
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polityka - konserwacja - prawo
ГНЕ POLICY — CONSERVATION — LAW
Autorzy:
Pruszyński, Jan Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535121.pdf
Data publikacji:
1982
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
stan prawny ochrony zabytków w Polsce
wpływ polityki na ochronę zabytków
wpływ przemian politycznych i społecznych po wojnie na ochronę zabytków
działanie polityki w stosunku do dóbr kultury
polityka państwa wobec dóbr kultury
ochrona zabytków w Polsce po II wojnie światowej
Opis:
The author starts by saying that some representatives of conservation in Poland have been able to notice changes in the nature of conservation work towards reconstruction, an operation which is very expensive but inconsistent with the rules of conservation art. One of the reasons for ill-success in conservation is the law (the 1962 Law on the Protection of Cultural Property and on Museums) which has been recognized as best, although non-respected and incomplete due to the lack of some executory regulations. The author puts forward the thesis that the policy and the law, next to conservation principles, decide of the ups and downs in this field. A present picture of the protection and conservation of monuments is the result of war destruction, territorial and national changes, political and social transformations. Unpublished circular letters of the Board of Museums and Monuments Protection of the Ministry of Culture and Arts could not be respected by field administration that was indifferent to them. They were respected by the conservation services who, however, were subjected to district authorities as a result of the administrative reform of the country (1975). Shortcomings of the Law were also the reason for the lack of respect for its regulations by other ministries and users of historic structures. The author presents fundamental tasks in the field of general state policy towards cultural property: recognition of the supreme principle that the cultural property is of utmost significance to the nation, introduction of necessary changes into the curriculum, restitution of the standing due to conservation services, better information in the means of mass communication and finally exaction of the duties of the users with regard to planning and repairing. It is also indispensable to update the Law. The organization of the protection of the cultural property calls for changes both at central and field administrative levels. With this in mind, the author suggests to establish the Council for the Protection of Cultural Property as a supervising, coordinating and opinion-giving body, to vest the Minister of Culture and Arts with the right to inspect qualifications of field conservation services, to provide financial means for the execution of the provisions of the Law No 179 of the Council of Ministers (financial aid given to future users who will undertake reconstruction and conservation work on monuments of architecture), to vest the Minister with the right to revise verdicts in actions closely associated with the protection of monuments, to restructure the field conservation bodies and to carefully select a candidate for the post of voivodship monuments conservator, and finally to statutorily separate the conservation office as department of the Voivodship Council.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 3-4; 176-181
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies