Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "ochrona krajobrazu" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
    Tytuł:
    Alienacja ochrony środowiska kulturowego : konieczność ochrony pozamiejskich nieruchomości zabytkowych
    ALIENATION OF THE PROTECTION OF THE CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT. THE NECESSARY PROTECTION OF NON-URBAN HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
    Autorzy:
    Wycichowska, Barbara
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538117.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2002
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    środowisko kulturowe
    ochrona środowiska kulturowego
    ochrona krajobrazu kulturowego
    ochrona zabytków
    ogólnospołeczna edukacja kulturowa
    regulacje prawne ochrony zabytków
    wspomaganie prywatnych inwestorów obiektów kulturowych.
    dofinansowanie działań rewitalizacyjnych
    adaptacja obiektów kulturowych
    ochrona nieruchomości kulturowych
    Opis:
    The neglect of the cultural environment by sciences dealing with the environment generates a low cultural level of society, a lack of interest in procultural activity and, as a consequence, an alienation of the protection of cultural environment. The cultural environment remains the object of the interest and activity pursued by only a small group of professionals and enthusiasts, who are isolated both socially and in the mass media, and act within their own associations or individually. Binding legal regulations do not create an atmosphere conducive for the active protection of historical monuments. Potential investors are deterred by lengthy lists of obligations and burdens imposed upon the owners of historical monuments as well as non-acceptance by the local community and even communal authorities. Only effective activity in the domains of legislation and education, and the assistance rendered to the protection of historical monuments by communal self-governments and the local community can enhance the effectiveness of salvaging historical monuments. In the perspective of joining the European Union, the protection of non-urban historical monuments assumes particular importance for rendering indelible examples of Polish national identity in the rural landscape, which will testify to the varied cultural accomplishments of the nations of a united Europe.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 3-4; 378-382
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Problemy pejzażu kulturowego wsi
    PROBLEMS OF THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE COUNTRYSIDE
    Autorzy:
    Kornecki, Marian
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537796.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1982
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    problemy pejzażu kulturowego wsi
    pejzaż kulturowy wsi
    bogactwo panoramy kulturowej
    ochrona panoramy kulturowej
    ochrona krajobrazu kulturowego
    zagrożenia dla przestrzeni kulturowych
    dewastacja wartości kulturowych
    kierunki ochrony zabytków wsi
    problemy rewaloryzacji wsi
    ochrona wartości kulturowych wsi
    ratowanie kultury duchowej
    Opis:
    The subject-matter of the article is the appraisal of the problem of cultural identity of the countryside in the process of historic conditionings as a synthesis of interdependencies of natural and man-made factors on a specific area. Considerations comprise a modern process of impendencies threatening the cultural panorama, a brief discussion on hitherto forms of protection and finally proposals concerning integrated protection covering all fields that make cultural values as well as some methodological comments. And here are the most important statements. A cultural picture of the countryside is the history recorded in a concrete landscape; its shape and identification have been affected by a number of factors both original nature-derived as well as secondary man-made ones. A similarity of factors and historical unity of vast areas decided of the formation of features that were common and determinant for each country and region, the sum of which represents the richness of the cultural panorama and human attainments. Next to its properties recorded on the scene of the outside world, the cultural panorama has also its non-material dimensions without which external forms could not get crystallized. The field of spiritual culture seems to drift us away from a traditional scope of activities dictated by professional limits; it must however be always kept in mind, as its contribution conditions the behaviour of the content inherent in the material substance and form. The cultural panorama is not invariable. It is subject to evolutions and transformations; it may be either enriched or reduced. Its behaviour during transformation is of essential importance, just as it represents roots of the social link, awareness and self-determination of regional communities and nations, capable of deciding of their lives and persistence in face of an inevitable passing away of individuals by the law of nature. In a historical process a picture of the countryside developed harmonously when works of men remained in a logical relation to a specific area, of whom they were an integral part. A menance to the cultural landscape appeared when the balance of the functioning of the ecosystem and component of both material and non-material nature specific for the function and identity of the rural body got disturbed. The present day brings with it transformations on an unprecedented scale and at a very rapid pace. Without going into the appraisal of the situation as a whole it can easily be seen that the present pace of urbanization results not only in devastation of the ecosystem but also in destruction of the entire cultural areas. This can be noticed in: — degradation of the natural environment due to an excessive depletion of its resources, — decline and disintegration of social links as well as disappearance of characteristics individualizing rural bodies as a result of an accelerated process of the integration of rural and town communities, — devastation of rural structures as a result of investments that did not fit into their historical space arrangements, — disappearance of traditional functions of rural bodies as a result of transformations that were against their nature. Devastation and disappearance of the traditional building is only one of a vast number of phenomena. They were sped up by a bad technical condition of resources and low utility standard. Still, the worst factor was a psychical pressure that regarded old or traditional buildings as an expression of backwardness. Apart from that, building, fire-protection and insurance regulations as well as the so-called orderly campaigns permitted further devastation of wooden constructions. A departure of the wooden village into the past became a real fact. Unfortunately, the old architecture has been replaced by the one that was far from being perfect and by unplanned chaotic location on undeveloped areas. The features of regional identity flowing from tradition, logics of function and place have disappeared. Should the countryside become an area of subculture or, at the best case, a smaller town? When watching the development of the protection of architectural monuments and material rural culture one can notice the evolution of doctrines and practice assosiated with broadly understood notion of “historic monuments”, which in turn leads to comprising both individual structures, their complexes and structural arrangements. Still, this development is not free from controversies, negligence (e.g. in the field of the so-called serial buildings or industrial plants), conflicts or “competence void”. One should also notice that open-air museums represent only a partial solution on an limited museological scale. Attempts have been made to set up “rural reserves” displaying clashes of the countryside with life problems. In this context, the need for a regular development of the countryside with a simultaneous preservance of cultural identity and continuity prompts us to consider the problem of the reinstatement of the countryside as the task, which would mean actions aimed at protecting the cultural landscape in the process of development. This is combined with the integration of the protection of all elements that make up the cultural identity, namely: — factual natural landscape, — settlement structure fixed in the hamlet plan, road network and field expanses, — resources of building substance, greenery and water arrangements, — certain non-material elements affecting characteristics of the cultural picture. Only the countryside seen in that way, in its entire territory, should become a field for the revival, which may be achieved by: — full recording of cultural resources, — their scientific analysis and estimation, — designation of protection zones, — drawing of guidelines for the protection, and — their introduction, as an obligatory element, into plans of spatial development. Hitherto experiences have revealed a need for cooperation between various scientific disciplines, specialists of which are represented in the cultural picture. Prospects for the cooperation of the scientific profession have been opened wide. A separate problem the discussion of which goes beyond the framework of the present report is the saving of spiritual culture, which, from the very beginning, was formed in the sphere of the principles of ideal nature specific for the Polish nation and manifested itself in numerous traits that combine spiritual wefts with a vision of the outside world. Its behaviour should take place not only in the form of popularizing superficial folk forms but also in the shaping of awareness in the educational process and social life.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 3-4; 143-155
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zagadnienia ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego krajobrazu
    THE PROTECTION OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE OF LANDSCAPES
    Autorzy:
    Świątkowski, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535533.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2002
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego krajobrazu
    wartości przyrodnicze i historyczne
    krajobraz kulturowy
    Ośrodek Ochrony Zabytkowego Krajobrazu
    krajobrazy przemysłowe
    krajobrazy pól bitewnych
    krajobrazy sakralne
    krajobrazy osadnicze
    krajobraz miast
    Opis:
    The national heritage of landscapes is one of the most valuable goods of the material legacy of national culture. Cultural landscape is of great social significance for the maintenance of the tradition of seeking national roots and identity. Over centuries, the landscape has been shaped in accordance with the characteristic traits of a given region, natural environment and national culture, and featured the diversity of ethnic cultures. Postwar years brought evolving landscape management inconsiderate and unattractive urban and rural development as well as economically unrelated forms of economic management. General confusion and a lack of identity of the site of the socalled little homeland call for a common awareness of the need for extending protection over entire areas of the cultural landscape in their conserved historic shape. Conservation practice, together with theoretical knowledge acquired during the protection of historic landscapes, paves the way to novel, world-wide trends in cultural heritage protection. It extends protection over not merely individual and collective complexes of historic property, but also moulded landscape areas, cementing the diversified conservation issues of the protection of all of its cultural ingredients in a coherent entity. Harmonious cultural and measured laid-out landscape, settlement landscape, industrial landscape and landscapes of linked natural and technological elements, battlefield landscapes and religious landscapes, with their individual, characteristic features, are a manifestation of national culture and tradition. To preserve the cultural heritage of landscapes it is necessary to devise mechanisms of sustainable development, in which the rank of culture, tradition and history of a region will equal its economic counterpart. Sustainable natural cultural and economic development increasingly resorts to the activation of tourism, involving the growing economic importance and dimension of historic landscapes and their promotion. A link between history and transformation may be seen in the cultural landscape, which plays an ever larger role in the cultural heritage protection strategy within the European Union.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 3-4; 383-390
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Kazimierz Dolny - uwagi o dziejach rozwoju przestrzennego, problemy ochrony krajobrazu kulturowego : część II
    KAZIMIERZ DOLNY — NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF LAND DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS OF THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPE
    Autorzy:
    Żurawski, Jerzy
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535811.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1982
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    Kazimierz Dolny
    dzieje rozwoju przestrzennego Kazimierza Dolnego
    ochrona krajobrazu kulturowego Kazimierza Dolnego
    Karol Siciński
    Plan zagospodarowania przestrzennego Kazimierza Dolnego
    postulaty konserwatorskie dotyczące zagospodarowania zabytkowego zespołu miejsko-krajobrazowego
    program konserwatorski dla Kazimierza Dolnego
    przenoszenie do Kazimierza zabytków drewnianego budownictwa ludowego
    Kazimierski Park Krajobrazowy
    Mięćmierz koło Kazimierza Dolnego
    Opis:
    P a rt II P a rt I of the present article published in ’’Ochrona Zabytków” no 1/1978 ended with a discussion of the period of the reconstruction of Kazimierz Dolny soon after World War II. P a rt II is devoted mainly to a land planning in Kazimierz afte r 1951 when Karol Siciński’s plan, worked out still in 1946—47, was approved officially. In the nearly th irty years th a t followed several versions of general and detailed plans of the town were drawn. A review of the plans displays changing views on the fu tu re shape of the town, its function, number of inhabitants and a very differentiated approach to the problem. A p a rticu la r attention paid by town-planners to this little town has always been based on the concern to preserve its unique historic and n a tu ra l values. However, during works on individual stages of the studies, specialists in modern programming, town-planning, sta n dardization and transport solutions have, as a rule, succeeded in forcing th e ir proposals. The state services of monuments protection participated in the planning of Kazimierz only to a small extent; the ir suggestions were either too general or not taken into account at all. In 1966 a general and detailed plan of Kazimierz was thrown open to competition. From the point of view of monuments protection it was not prepared well and did not come to expectations with regard to an optimum solution. On the basis of the results of the competition in 1967— 1970 general and detailed plans of the town were p repared and approved. Also this time conservation guidelines worked out by the Ministry of Culture and Arts were not formulated precisely and the participation of a voivodship conservator was limited to formal actions. As a result th e re appeared a plan with town-planning solutions, transport and servicing in particular, th a t endangered the scale and nature of the town. It envisaged a number of public investments, the harmful of which were: a modern throughfare between the Vistual and the centre of the town, construction of a new road inside the town, parallel to historic Senatorska and Nadrzeczna streets, a roundabout-type and a two-level cross- road in front of the Reformers cloister as well as large service and trad e projects in the place traditionally used for the building of detached houses in gardens, and finally the building of a large rest house on a picturesque hill. Despite that the plans were approved. Then, in 1971— 1972 the local population and manily associations of artists and publicists of the most highly esteemed cultural papers, rose some doubts about them. As a result of this criticism the Ministry of Culture and Arts entrusted in 1972 the Museum at Kazimierz Dolny with a task of conservation protection. This created conditions conducive to the formulation of new criterions of the protection of a historic urban, architectural and natural complex. They consisted in proving that all values of Kazimierz, including those of secondary importance such as old building lines, a scale of the building-up in individual streets, modest small-town houses, paved roads and squares, use of traditional materials, et.c., should be considered and covered by plans. Attention was drawn to the necessity to officially include in protection plans natural surroundings as an integral component of town’s cultural values. This conservation programme was approved by the authorities who decided of the need to bring a general and detailed plan of Kazimierz up-to-date on the basis of new more thorough and comprehensive studies. The Consultants Team was established; it gave opinions on subsequent stages of preparations. The Museum at Kazimierz Dolny brought to life an architectural group whose tasks were to make urban and architectural studies as conservation guidelines for individual elements of the town. A new general plan was drawn by the Voivodship Town-Planning Workshop in Lublin, headed by architect U. Frąk. A detailed plan was prepared by the Monuments Conservation Workshop in Lublin, under the direction of architect J. Jamiołkowska. The two plans were prepared at the same time, with a detailed one being in the foreground. The plans were approved in 1975. They paid a full respect to conservation guidelines expressed in 1972 and at the same time they determined the town’s function as a tourist centre and local administration, solved in-town communication within the existing network of streets with the principle of the access by perpends from the circuit passing by Kazimierz in through traffic. The plan paid also attention to a modern infrastructure in the town, a general character and scale of which remained unchanged. The maximum number of inhabitants within the boundaries of the historic town was agreed to be 3,000 people, just as it was in the period of the town’s flourishing at the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries. In 1979 on the basis of the said plans a renewal programme was worked out for the town centre, divided into several stages of its execution. From 1973 the works have been carried out on the protection, conservation and reconstruction of the most valuable monuments of architecture, to mention only granaries from the 17th century, the Celejówka stone-house, ruins of the castle. Basing on the plans, private detached houses are being built in the town, the character of which has been adapted to a historie complex of tenement houses and other buildings. Necessary municipal investments have been undertaken and are continued. Works have been initiated on the designing and execution of the most indispensable buildings for public use. A translocation of historic wooden buildings to Kazimierz and Męćmierz, a neighbouring small village, has been applied as well. The aim of this undertaking is to rescue the monuments that cannot be preserved in situ and to enlarge the number of wooden buildings in the town, according to its old historic nature.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1982, 1-2; 3-27
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Uwagi na temat programów ochrony konserwatorskiej zabytkowych zespołów miejskich
    SOME REMARKS CONCERNING THE PROGRAMMES OF PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL URBAN SETTINGS
    Autorzy:
    Przyłęcki, Mirosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535946.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1973
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    ochrona zabytkowych zespołów miejskich
    ocena wartości zabytkowych elementów
    zabytek urbanistyki
    ochrona zabytkowego układu przestrzennego
    komponowanie zabytkowego krajobrazu
    Opis:
    Th e a u th o r , ta k in g th e c o n s e rv a to r’s p o in t of view, de a ls w ith p ro b lem s of p ro te c tio n of h is to ric a l u rb a n se ttin g s w ith in th e processes of reb u ild in g , re c o n s tru c tio n , ex te n s io n an d ad a p ta tio n . All m e a su re s in th is re sp e c t re q u ire th a t b efore th e all a se t of c rite ria fo r a ss e ssm e n t a n d selection be p re p a re d wh ile both tow n -p la n n e r an d a rc h ite c t should b e a r in th e ir minds the fu n c tio n a n d th e role p lay ed by a h is to ric a l u rb a n s e ttin g w ith in th e e n tire u rb a n organism of a modern town. A p p ro p ria te step s should be ta k e n in each se p a r a te c ase a imed a t d e fin in g of th e h e ig h ts an d sizes a n d a lso of k in d s of b u ild in g th a t h a s to comp lemen t th e h is to ric a l b u ild in g s an d also be considered th e te ch n ic a l, te ch n o lo g ic a l an d o rg an iz a tio n a l aspects of m o d e rn iz a tio n s to b e in tro d u c ed in h isto ric a l settings. Th e a b o v e -lis te d p o in ts w e re a lre ad y sev e ra l time s d iscu ssed d u rin g th e m e e tin g s of ex p e rts. The damage s c au sed to h is to ric a l u rb a n s e ttin g s by m ilita ry ac tio n s d u rin g th e World War II h av e forced a ll th e concerned w ith th a t p ro b lem, i.e. a rc h ite c ts, tow n -p la n n e rs an d c o n se rv a to rs to look a fte r a p p ro p ria te so lu tio n s th a t could be ap p lied to re b u ild in g a n d re c o n s tru c tio n of towns. In th is connection n um e ro u s th e o re tic a l cons id e ra tio n s an d p ro p o sa ls of g en e ra l n a tu r e w e re fo rm u la te d b u t, fo r in s tan c e , th a t be in g a co n c ep t of a „ tow n -re s e rv a tio n ” fo r h is to ric a lly p a tte rn e d towns did n o t fin d su p p o rt by those co n cern ed in th is co u n try . Nowadays, w h ile p la n n in g th e re h a b ilita tio n it should, in th e f ir s t line, be b o rn e in min d th a t a ll tr a n s it, i.e. d ire c tly ru n n in g ma ss tr a ffic sh o u ld be removed from h is to ric a l u rb a n c en tre s, gre en b e lts be e s ta b lish ed an d th e a r c h ite c tu ra l d om in an ts c a re fu lly a ccen tu a te d . One of th e most d ifficu lt p ro b lem s is p e rm an e n tly e n co u n te re d in tow n s h av in g th e ir u rb a n tissu e s composed of b u ild in g s v a ry in g as to th e ir v a lu e and, in a d d itio n , th e selection of a p ro p e r concept of th e ir sp a tia l deve lo pm en t. U n til th e re c e n t tim e th e re w e re c re a te d th re e concepts of re h a b ilita tio n of a h isto ric a l u rb a n s e ttin g co n sistin g in: (1) a d a p ta tio n of new a rc h ite c tu re to a defin ed sty le of e x is tin g h isto ric a l b u ild in g w hich th e solution w h en con sid e red from an a e s th e tic a l v iew p o in t co n ta in s th e sm a lle st possible n um b e r of risk s a n d th u s has fo u n d n um e ro u s su p p o rte rs ; (2) rem o v a l of an c ie n t, in p rin c ip le , n o t h is to ric a l b u ild in g (though in p ra c tic e s ev e ra l in s tan c e s may be listed in w h ich also h is to ric a l b u ild in g s w e re removed) an d c re a tin g in its pla c e of m o d e rn a rc h ite c tu r e w ith its s ta n d a rd iz e d shapes (blocks of fla ts); in th is case, however, h is to ric a l b u ild in g s a re m a rk e d ly c o n tra s tin g w ith th o se mo d e rn an d th e towns a re d e p riv e d of th e ir original, h is to ric a l, c u ltu ra l an d a e s th e tic a l v a lu e s ; (3) designing of new b u ild in g in a ll th e se p la c e s w h e re losses a re to be fou n d in th e densely b u ilt q u a r te r s w ith a sim u ltan eo u s c a re fu l a d a p ta tio n of new b u ild in g s to th e ir h is to ric a l su rro u n d in g s. While emphasizing th e n e ed to c a re fu lly a p ro a c h to h is to ric a l u rb a n p a tte rn s th e a u th o r mak e s a n a p p e a l to d esig n ers th a t th e y sh o u ld rem em b e r a b o u t th e nec e ssity to lim it th e ag gressive fe a tu re s in a r c h ite c tu r a l fo rm s of th e ir b u ild in g s, to m o d e ra te ly use th e colours on th e ir fa ç ad e s an d d e ta ils and, fin a lly , to ap p ly th e p ro p e rly ad a p te d m a te ria ls. As a n o th e r im p o rta n t fe a tu re th a t may decisively in flu en c e th e c h a ra c te r of th e new b u ild in g s is m en tio n ed th e m o d e ra te use of p u b lic ity media in th e fo rm of illum in a te d a d v e rtisin g a n d e le c tric signs. All th e above re q u irem e n ts w e re sev e ra l time s p u t fo rw a rd d u rin g discussions on new designs of th e h is to ric a l u rb a n centres. Howeve r, u n til now th ey a re s till considered as p ro p o sa ls w ith o u t an y co n c re te ex am p le s th a t could be tr e a te d as some k in d of model solution. All th e above rem a rk s m ad e by a p ra c tic isin g a r c h ite c tc o n se rv a to r a re c le a rly enough ch a ra c te riz in g th e ra n g e of d ifficu ltie s w ith w h ich a re fa c ed th e d e sig n e rs in th e ir e v e ry -d a y w o rk devoted to a d a p ta tio n a n d r e h a b ilita tio n of h is to ric a l u rb a n settings.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 1973, 1; 29-39
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Stary ogród – pomiędzy ogrodem zabytkowym a pomnikiem przyrody
    Der alte Garten – zwischen Garten- und Naturdenkmal
    Autorzy:
    Schelter, Alfred
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535596.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
    Tematy:
    ogród zabytkowy
    konserwacja ogrodów
    pielęgnacja ogrodów zabytkowych
    restauracja ogrodów zabytkowych
    ogrody historyczne
    ochrona ogrodów zabytkowych
    konserwacja ogrodów w Bawarii
    Niemieckie Towarzystwo Sztuki Ogrodowej i Kultury Krajobrazu
    Gartendenkmal
    Konservierung von historischen Gärten
    Gartendenkmalpflege
    Gartenrestaurierung
    historische Gärten
    Gartendenkmalschutz
    Gartenkunst
    Gartendenkmalpflege in Bayern
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gartenkunst und Landschaftskultur
    Opis:
    Określenie „stary ogród” jest pojęciem relatywnym, odnoszącym się do wieku. Interpretacja łączącej się z nim problematyki powiązana jest z takimi definicjami jak „ogród zabytkowy” i „pomnik przyrody”. Do powstania form określanych mianem „stare ogrody” dochodzi w przypadku zaniechania systematycznej, ciągłej pielęgnacji. Istniejące regulacje prawne, akty międzynarodowe dotyczące ochrony zabytków, w szczególności Karta Florencka oraz wytyczne sformułowane przez organizacje zawodowe stworzyły liczne instrumenty służące definiowaniu wartości ogrodów, ich badaniom, restaurowaniu i pielęgnacji. Wynikające z nich przesłanki nie stanowią jednak jednoznacznych zasad postępowania. Ostateczna decyzja o kierunku postępowania konserwatorskiego jest zawsze kompromisem wynikającym z wielu uwarunkowań. Naczelnym przesłaniem musi być jednak pielęgnacja ogrodów w celu ich zachowania, a nie tworzenie „własnych zabytków” pod pozorem konserwacji.
    Die Bezeichnung „alter Garten“ ist ein realtiver Begriff, der sich auf das Alter bezieht. Die Interpretation der mit ihm verbundenen Problematik knüpft an solche Begriffe wie „Gartendenkmal“ oder „Naturdenkmal“ an. Solche Gebilde, die als „alte Gärten“ bezeichnet werden, entstehen infolge der Unterlassung von systematischer und stetiger Pflege. Die bestehenden rechtlichen Bestimmungen, internationalen Rechtsakte zur Denkmalpflege, insbesondere die Charta von Florenz, sowie die Bestimmungen von Berufsverbänden erschufen zahlreiche Instrumente, die der Wertschätzung von Gärten, ihrer Erforschung, Restaurierung und Pflege dienen. Die aus ihnen hervorgehenden Beschlüsse stellen aber keine eindeutigen Vorgehensweisen dar. Der endgültige Beschluss über die Art und Weise der konservatorischen Maßnahmen ist immer ein Kompromiss, der auf zahlreichen Variablen fusst. Die Hauptaufgabe sollte jedoch die Pflege der Gärten sein, mit dem Ziel ihrer Erhaltung. Es sollte keineswegs die Schaffung von „eigenen Denkmälern“ unter dem Vorwand der Denkmalpflege sein.
    Źródło:
    Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 1; 195-214
    0029-8247
    Pojawia się w:
    Ochrona Zabytków
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies