Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "interpretacja przepisow" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
KATARZYNA ZALASIŃSKA, „OCHRONA ZABYTKÓW. ORZECZNICTWO Z KOMENTARZEM” LexisNexis, Warszawa 2010: recenzja
KATARZYNA ZALASIŃSKA, ”THE PROTECTION Of HISTORICAL MONUMENTS. ADJUDICATION WITH A COMMENTARY”, LexisNexis, Warszawa 2010
Autorzy:
Jagielska, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538822.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
KATARZYNA ZALASIŃSKA
OCHRONA ZABYTKÓW
problematyka prawna ochrony zabytków
interpretacja przepisów
wpis do rejestru zabytków
przykłady wyroków
Opis:
At the beginning of this year the LexisNexis publishers issued a book, which excellently fills the gap that emerged from the time of the binding Statute of 23 July 2003 on the protection of historical monuments. This is the first book of its sort to render available, analyse and subject to a constructive assessment the accomplishments of the judicature as regards the range of the protection of historical monuments and adjudication pronounced upon the basis of the statue in force. The author, who presents the young generation of lawyers, is one of the few researchers dealing with the legal aspects of the protection of historical monuments. The book offers a lucid presentation of the mechanics of the impact of law, and allows the reader to understand the nature of law and the ways in which it should be deployed so that undertakings associated with the protection of historical monuments would be effective. The adjudication of administrative courts discussed in the book depicts essential problems linked with an interpretation of regulations upon the stage of their application. The cited examples contain important directives, which the conservation organs should follow while interpreting the regulations of material law and choosing suitable administrative procedure. The titular publication will certainly prove useful for lawyers and employees of government and self-government administration. Presumably, it will also meet with great interest among conservators not attached to the administration as well as the owners of historical monuments.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 1; 101-102
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zakaz fotografowania w regulaminie muzeum – komentarz do Wyroku Sądu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów z dnia 5 maja 2010 roku
BAN ON PHOTOGRAPHING IN THE REGULATIONS OF THE MUSEUM - COMMENTS TO THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF COMPETITION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ON 5 MAY 2010
Autorzy:
Drela, Monika
Trzciński, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537051.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zakaz fotografowania w muzeach
wyrok sądu z 5 maja 2010 roku
interpretacja przepisów prawnych
klauzule niedozwolone
niedozwolone postanowienia regulaminu muzeum
regulamin muzeum
opłaty za wykonywanie zdjęć
Opis:
In the middle of 2009, the Regional Court in Warsaw (Court of Competition and Consumer Protection) received a petition to recognise provisions of the model agreement as prohibited. The plaintiff claimed that the provisions of [tar. 8 of the Regulations lor use of exhibited museum items used by the Września Children Regional Museum in Września, reading as follows: “Photographing and filming of exhibits and exhibition rooms is prohibited without the permission of the director of the museum. Photographing is possible after such permission is obtained and a fee is paid”, should be deemed prohibited. The Court recognised the provisions of the model agreement as prohibited and ruled that the provisions of the model agreement with the content quoted above must not be used by the Września Children Regional Museum in Września in transactions with consumers. The essential aim of the article is to determine legal consequences of the decision being discussed and the entering of the provisions concerned into the Register of Prohibited Clauses by the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection. The authors of the article give answers to frequently asked questions concerning the impact of the entry in the Register of Prohibited Clauses on the validity of similar provisions used in regulations of other museums. It is important here that, although the said decision was issued according to the procedure for abstractive control of provisions of the regulations of the museum and refers only to the regulation which is the object of proceedings before the regional court, its impact affects the interpretation of the provisions about abusive clauses carried out in other potential similar cases. In this context, it is important that if other museums make use of any provisions identical to the provisions of par. 8 of the Regulations of the Września Children Regional Museum in Września that were recognised as prohibited in the decision referred to above, such identical provisions cannot be automatically regarded as prohibited (abusive).
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 4; 83-89
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies